Preview

Case Summary: Burwel V. Hobby, Inc.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1266 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Summary: Burwel V. Hobby, Inc.
BURWELL V. HOBBY LOBBY, INC. 134 S. Ct 2751 (US 2014)
SUPREME COURT OF UNITED STATES

Facts: Hobby Lobby is a family owned arts and crafts store that runs on Christian principles. The companies statement of purpose is “honoring the Lord in all [they] do by operating the company in a manner consistent with Biblical principles.” The family does not believe in the use of contraception but under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), the company is required to offer a minimum coverage health care plan that includes forms of contraception. The plaintiffs filed suit to challenge the requirement to provide contraceptive method to their employees under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), the First Amendment (Free Exercise
…show more content…
Lee (1982), the Supreme Court ruled that an employer cannot deprive employees of a statutory right because of religious beliefs. It was later ruled that Lee does not apply because the challenge was not a significant burden. Under RFRA, a Government action that imposes a burden on religious exercise must serve a government interest. HHS must constitute the least restrictive means of serving that interest, and the mandate for the Hobby Lobby case fails that test. Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), companies with 50 or more full time employees are required to offer a health care plan that provides minimum health care coverage, including forms of contraception. It was ruled that there are other ways in which Congress, or even HHS, could equally ensure that women had cost-free access to contraceptives. The Supreme Court ruled that individuals should not have to surrender their religious independence in order to open a business. Therefore, religious family-owned corporations such as Hobby Lobby, cannot be forced to pay for employees’ contraception …show more content…
Corporations are now also to be treated like “people” and have the same rights as a single person would have. If the court had chosen an alternative rule, corporations would still be required to provide insurance coverage for contraception. I do not agree with the decision, I feel that although it may interfere with a corporation’s religious beliefs, a woman’s decision about her health and lifestyle is ultimately her decision and her rights should not be taken away because of the owner’s beliefs. Due to this ruling, I believe that companies will now use the excuse of religious beliefs as reasons to not provide full coverage to their employees and will use it as a way to avoid fines and providing the right

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The litigation was brought by investors of Osborne Computer Corp. a computer manufacturing company. The business was founded in 1980 by Adam Osborne. The Company grew rapidly, and by fall of 1982, sales reached $10 million per month, making the company one of the fastest growing enterprises in the history of American business. Late in 1982, Osborne planned an initial public stock offering. In the process, the company retained service of Arthur Young to prepare audit reports and financial statements. Arthur Young issued unqualified or "clean" audit opinions on the company's 1981 and 1982 financial statements. In order to obtain funds to finance the company until the public offering was consummated, Osborne issued warrants to certain venture capitalists in exchange for direct loans. The warrants entitled the holders to purchase stocks at favorable prices, which would result in large profits to the holders when, and if, the public offering took place. Shortly after the warrant transaction closed in April 1983, the company's financial performance faltered. Sales declined sharply because of manufacturing problems with the company’s new…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Grutter v. Bollinger was also a case in which race was still used as an admission factor. This case involved the admission process to The University of Michigan's law school. Just as the University of Texas they used the hard data and soft data process to admit different students into their program. Race was used as a plus factor under the soft data category and the law school was seeking critical mass by becoming more diverse within its student population. Yet, the question was how did the university know the race of the person? As they did not have a so called race check box. They asked different questions such as where the students are from or what language was spoken within their homes. The court again said this was ok, as they school was…

    • 164 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobby Lobby. This case centered around a portion of the Affordable Care Act that required employers to cover certain FDA-approved contraceptives. The owners of Hobby Lobby, the Greene family, are devout Christians and felt that they could not do this due to religious freedom. The court ruled that forcing them to cover contraceptives violated their beliefs, and they could not be forced to comply. Justice Alito claimed that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act applied to corporations, and forcing Hobby Lobby to comply was burdening them. Ginsburg replied to this with a 35-page dissent paper and forced it to be delivered to the press. The opening line to her set the tone for the entire paper “[i]n a decision of startling breadth, the Court holds that commercial enterprises, including corporations, along with partnerships and sole proprietorships, can opt out of any law (saving only tax laws) they judge incompatible with their sincerely held religious beliefs.” (Ginsburg…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I completely agree with the opinion that the Hobby Lobby case is justified. The new interpretation that religion can also pertain to private corporations due to the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. This allows for Hobby Lobby to deny birth control to employees. However, as many have stated before, the employees’ individual rights to birth control have to be respected as well. Just because the corporation itself does not believe in the birth control, this does not mean the corporation can ignore the workers’ rights to have birth control. Thus, I believe that Hobby Lobby is able to defer birth control payments to the federal government because employees that seek birth control are still able to receive it. However, in recitations,…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Supreme Court case, Zubik v. Burwll is aimed to answer multiple questions. The first question this case aims to answer is does the availability of a regulatory exemption for religious employers regarding the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate eliminate the substantial burden on those organizations’ exercise of their religious freedom? The second question this case will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines satisfy the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s demanding test for overriding religious objections? Last, the third question this court will answer is do the Department of Health and Human Services’ guidelines violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act when the government has not proven that the guidelines…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    She believes that the Hobby Lobby case and the decision will open up more corporations to “opt out of any law” (Ginsburg, 2014). That allows the people behind the corporation also known as the owners could potentially harm the workers. Ruth Ginsburg states that the key difference between for-profit and nonprofit corporations is that non-profit corporations can claim to be a unified community, while for-profit corporations will vary in views and needs from the owners and the employees. That the religious objections against certain protections could harm their employees by not giving them the healthcare protection they need that is protected under ACA. Things that could be taken away from workers that are very important for someone’s well being is blood transfusions, vaccines, and pills with gelatin coating; all of these things could offend the Jehovah’s Witness, Christian Scientists, Muslims, Jews, and Hindus (Oyez,…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobby Lobby Case

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    16 out of the total 20 contraceptives were available on the plan in which Hobby Lobby offered and they maintained a religious enterprise throughout; the court finding that Hobby Lobby did indeed have a history of sincere religious beliefs that conflicted with the statutes of the mandate in question. Moreover, Hobby Lobby was found to be burdened financially in either course of action. The government argued that it was in the compelling interest of the governed to discount the burdens placed on the religious to accommodate a very miniscule minority which would be effected. To sum up the case briefly, the court decided that the burden created of violating religious freedom outweighed any economic burden that would arise out of Hobby Lobby being exempt from providing 4 contraceptives out of 20 total that the ACA mandated. Furthermore, the court decided that accommodations for the religious frequently operate by lifting burdens and placing them…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stutzman Case Summary

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “This case is about crushing dissent. In a free America, people with differing beliefs must have room to coexist,” ADF’s senior counsel Kristen Waggoner said in a statement. “It’s wrong for the state to force any citizen to support a particular view about marriage or anything else against their will. Freedom of speech and religion aren’t subject to the whim of a majority; they are constitutional guarantees.”…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobby Lobby, 2014). There is a blurry, but definite line where our rights can be obscured by other Amendment's purposes to help us as well. With Hobby Lobby's founders, the Green family, beliefs in certain contraceptive methods that are “abortifacients”, like RU-486, and the priority of giving employees the right accommodations to their liking, there can be some disagreement. The Green family was faced with a complicated problem where they had to choose to either “violate the law or violate their faith”. As individuals, one should put themselves in other perspectives to understand how these disagreements cause conflict in keeping the free exercise of religion…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though many know of the court case, not all people know the history of it. The part that many know is that the people were gay, lesbian, and so on, and most people also know that they were fighting for the right to marry. What too many people do not know is that even though court Justices were against it, the majority did not care since it did not affect them. Justice Scalia said the following in his statement, “The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me.” Since in many states, previous to the law passing, barely anyone who was same-sex could marry their spouse.Though this privilege was granted to opposite-sex spouses, along with insured plans, medical plans, and many other privileges. When the law was passed, same-sex couples would have the same privileges. “Insured plans in every state will require to offer coverage to same-sex spouses to the extent such plans cover opposite-sex…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    As you said, Valentin states the restrictions on women forcing not to have control their own bodies and productive rights. One form of restriction she talks about is “conscience clause laws.” 13 states allow pharmacists and healthcare professionals to refuse to provide medication if it goes against their moral and ethical beliefs. With the law, many healthcare providers and pharmacists refuse to prescribe or provide birth control. Valentin points out the irony in it. If they are against premarital sex and if that is why they refuse to sell birth control, they should check marital status for men as well before they sell them condoms. In reality, nobody does that. Their moral and ethical beliefs are practiced on women…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    With the introduction of Birth Control to the public it had its fair share of legal consequences. The case of Griswold v. Connecticut is considered the foundational decision in recognizing the constitutional right of sexual privacy (Stein, 2010, p. 29). In the case of Griswold v. Connecticut it was stated that Estelle Griswold and C. Lee Buxton were arrested for giving “information, instruction, and medical advice to married persons as to the means of preventing conception” (Stein, 2010, p. 29). Griswold was the executive director of the States Planned Parenthood League and C. Lee Buxton was a licensed physician as well as a professor at Yale (Stein, 2010, p. 29). The Connecticut law was that anyone that encouraged or used birth…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    BUL6810 ACA Paper

    • 2536 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The ACA is a complicated piece of legislation made up of many different provisions and regulations. Within this paper I will be discussing five of these provisions and three of the regulations that are either pending or existing. I will also be looking into two federal cases related to the constitutionality of the ACA - National Federation of Business v. Sebelius and Burwell v. Hobby Lobby.…

    • 2536 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article titled " Hobby Lobby Ruling Much More than Abortion" discusses the supreme court ruling regarding abortion and birth control. The author expressed that family owned businesses have been ruled in court to opt out of the federal requirement to pay for birth control in health coverage for their workers. The family owned business did not feel it was fair to follow the recent mandate by President Obama regarding contraceptives. Hobby Lobby was targeted by social media for being unfair and not giving freedom a chance based on their religious beliefs. Several people backing Hobby Lobby's philosophies stated they do not force people to work there. If a person chooses to not abide by Hobby Lobby's belief's, they do not have to choose…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For those who believe that human personhood begins during the early stages of pregnancy, the Supreme Court's decision and the state law repeals that preceded it may seem horrific, cold, and barbaric. And it is very easy to find quotes from some pro-choicers who are completely…

    • 4507 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays