Preview

case 49

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
case 49
FIN3CSF Case Studies in Finance
Semester 2, 2014
Case Study 5: Valuing the Enterprise
Due date: 4.00 pm, Monday, October 20th, 2014

CASE 49: GEs Proposed Acquisition of Honeywell

On March 1, 2001, the antitrust regulatory authority of the European Commission (EC) announced that it had initiated a review of the proposed takeover of Honeywell International Inc. by General Electric Company (GE). You are required to look at this situation from the point of view of an arbitrageur Jessica Gallinelli, who already holds a long position in Honeywell and a short position in GE.

Case Study Questions
1. Jessica Gallinelli must make a decision. Should she hold or sell her positions in GE and Honeywell? Justify your answer by analysing the main considerations in her decision (3 marks)
2. Consider the information in Case 49, Exhibits 4 through 10. What is a reasonable share value range for Honeywell? Justify your choice by making reference to (1) recent market prices; (2) financial data for comparable firms; (3) financial data for comparable transactions: Aerospace Industry; (4) financial data for comparable transactions: “Jumbo” deals; (5) discounted cash flow; (6) multiples valuation (i.e. stand-alone valuation summary Honeywell international; and (7) with-synergies valuation summary Honeywell international. (6 marks)
3. What is the return on investment for Gallinelli’s arbitrage position to March 1, 2001, if she opened her position on October 20, 2000? Refer to the worksheet “Arb Returns and Spreads” in the workbook or spreadsheet “Case_49.xls” and the related procedure for calculating this in [B] Case 48, pp. 692-3. (4 marks)
4. How will the market react to the news from antitrust regulators? Justify your answer by making reference to (a) the probability that the takeover succeeds or (2) the takeover fails (do not answer as if the takeover had already concluded). Include as a justification for your answer the analysis in the “Case_49-probability for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    case 12

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Shakespeare Inc., a private publishing company issued its F/S on March 20, 2012. There were several accruals and events that the management of Shakespeare is considering to determine if they should be recognized or disclosed in Dec 31, 2011 F/S. In my opinion, the important things to focus on subsequent events are the period they effect and if their influence is material or not, so that in conclusion, the F/S are fairly presented.…

    • 1909 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6) Right now, John and Mark didn’t figure out a workable exit strategy. If they sell Mile High now, potential buyers might think there are some problems in this company and won’t give a high price.…

    • 659 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 54 Questions

    • 1477 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Are book value or market value weights better for calculating the firm’s weighted average cost of capital?…

    • 1477 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case 9

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1) According to the financial statement and financial-ratio analysis of Horniman Horticulture, the revenue of this company kept growing from 788.5 thousand (in 2002) to 1048.8 thousand dollars(in 2005). In addition, the growth rate of revenue generally rose from 2.9% to 15.5%, even though the benchmark was only -1.8%. Moreover, in general, the margin, NFA turnover, ROA and ROC rose toward and above the benchmark from 2002 to 2005. To conclude, the profitability of Horniman Horticulture was better than benchmark.(strength)…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    case 9

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The evaluation process is essential to organizations because it determines their accountability in the community as well as their performance standards to the funders. Sometimes the proper information is not gathered and this makes proving those very things very difficult. The study labeled Case 9 (Lewis, Packard, & Lewis, 2007) is about an organization being evaluated by their funder and realizing that they have not gathered some of the information they were seeking. The organization had gathered all the information that was required for the previous year and had not evaluated within their own organization the information that would show their accountability to the community they serve. In this paper I will discuss preventing such situations, evaluation design, challenges and issues for the staff and evaluators, roles of the employees in this situation, and most importantly how the organization could have prevented this situation from happening.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Study guide for Kohler

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    4. What is the maximum share price at which Herbert Kohler should be willing to settle with the dissenting shareholders in order to stop the trial on April 11, 2000? Assume that (i) if the trial proceeds it is expected to last less than a month and result in two possible outcomes in terms of the price per share established in court: the $273,000 claimed by the plaintiffs, or the $55,400 being defended by Herbert Kohler; (ii) Kohler estimates the probabilities of these outcomes at 30% and 70%, respectively.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 10

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An increase in cash operating expenses decrease NOPAT, which in turn makes ROC extremely sensitive when this ratio goes up; in general when total operating expenses go up NOPAT goes down, thus ROC goes down. In addition if the COGS increase this drastically drops ROC. The total assets has a big impact on ROC an increase of 1000m increased ROC by a full 1.5 percent. The ROC is also very sensitive to the Price to Earnings ratio turnover; yet the receivable-turnover figure has little impact. Inventory turnover is also a factor that affects ROC drastically, a small decrease in inventory turnover drops the ROC drastically as shown below. But most interesting was that sales growth did not have any effect on ROC.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case 8-22

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What’s more, the coordination among departments in the company was less united as each just focused on…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 10

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What are the primary competitive forces impacting U.S. steel producers in general and the producers like Nucor that make new steel products via recycling scrap steel in particular? Please do a five-forces analysis to support your answer. 2. What driving forces do you see at work in this industry? Are they likely to impact the industry’s competitive structure favorably or unfavorably? 3. How attractive are the prospects for future profitability of U.S. steelmakers? Should Nucor consider expanding in this type of industry environment? Why or why not? 4. What type of strategy has Nucor followed? Which of the five generic strategies discussed in Chapter 5 is Nucor employing? Is there any reason to believe that Nucor has achieved a sustainable competitive advantage over many of its steel industry rivals? If so, what type of competitive advantage does Nucor enjoy? 5. What are the specific policies and operating practices that Nucor has employed to implement and execute its chosen strategy? 6. What specific factors account for why Nucor has been so successful over the past several decades? Do these factors have more to do with great strategy, great strategy execution, or great leadership? 7. What does a SWOT analysis reveal about Nucor’s situation? Does Nucor have any core or distinctive competencies? 8. What is your assessment of Nucor’s financial performance the past several years? How strong is the company’s financial condition? 9. What issues does Nucor management need to address? 10. What recommendations would you make to Dan DiMicco?…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The firm is considering takeover offers assumingly because the competition is attempting to gain market share. There is no evidence in the case which…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 42

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Sierra Capital Partners were considering a deal in which they would purchase 60% equity interest in Arcadian for $40 million dollars. Arcadian had drawn up the details regarding the deal, and Sierra’s managing director Rodney Chu had to analyze the deal and conclude what terms would be the most profitable for Sierra. The money Arcadian received from Sierra would be used for further financing of the firm’s growth. Chu’s initial analysis involved financial forecasting of equity cash flows. His final steps would be to estimate the terminal value for the…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case #16

    • 812 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When you take a look at the ratios, the Reed Company is poor on the parameters. In the company their current and quick ratio seems to be less than what the industry is and their liquidity is poor. Reed used to use more assets than what the industry did where in the long run the efficiency with the assets became low. They seem to keep more inventory as well as they collect more cash slowly. This makes the payable turnovers low. This is because they pay over a longer time to their creditors. The profitability in the company is low with a low gross margin and net margin. Also what is less than the industry average is the return on equity.…

    • 812 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This led John F. “Jack” Welch Jr., GE’s chair and CEO, to call Michael Bonsignore, chair and CEO of Honeywell, to present a bid maintaining a 1:1 share for share exchange ratio. GE won the bid against UTC and agreed to a price of 1.055 GE shares for every share of Honeywell’s, plus assumed debt. The regulatory filings were submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and notified the European Commission of the merger because of the large amount of European sales between the two companies. On July 3, 2001, the merger was denied. Bancroft Capital Management owns a large stake in Honeywell.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ge Case

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Facing up all the uncertainties associated with the potential acquisition between GE and Honeywell, Jessica Gallinelli, managing director of Bancroft Capital Management, definitely needs to consider whether and how the future news form Europe would affect the value of her fund’s arbitrage position, what the probability was that booth the DOJ and the Ec would approve the merger, and of course eventually what is the most proper and profitable tactic to take at this certain time.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 8-47

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. What is the competitive environment faced by MB? Thecompetitive environment was that the company faced difficulty incontrolling costs, material purchasing, and a fast changing market.The needs of the customer were changing and MB was facingmonetary losses. With regards to the AAV market this was targeted ata segment that was expanding, the sports utility segment. Jeep, Fordand GM dominated this. 2. How has MB reacted to the changingworld market for luxury automobiles? MB has reacted by developingits own all activities vehicle that would compete in the fast growingsports utility segment. In addition, MB has moved its manufacturingfacilities closer to the market that is the USA. Most, importantly it hasbecome more customer oriented and has used customer opinions fordeveloping almost every part of the car. It worked extensively withcustomers, suppliers and its designers to develop a car that would notonly meet customer expectations but would also help MB make profits.3. Using Cooper's cost, quality, and functionality chart,2 discuss thefactors on which MB competes with other automobile producers suchas Jeep, Ford, and GM. MB competes with other automobileproducers by differentiating its chassis, transmission, air conditioner,electrical system and other systems. MB tries to develop its productalong these function groups by meeting the categories of safety,comfort, economy and styling. In other words, MB is using the'function groups' to meet the concerns of the customers. MB is tryingto differentiate its higher priced product by positioning itself as betterin terms of safety, comfort, economy and styling. 4. How does theAAV project link with MB strategy in terms of market coverage? MBstrategy in terms of market coverage is that it wishes to streamline itscore business the AAV project helps MB to streamline its corebusiness. MB strategy was that it should have additional market share,new segments, and new niches. MB started developing…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays