Preview

Breaking The Right To Privacy Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Breaking The Right To Privacy Essay
Is searching people's phones for crime or broken laws invading people's privacy, and is it right? Some argue it is the right and first thing to do when it comes to this. Officials should not be able to unreasonably search people's phones for it is breaking the Fourth Amendment. This violates any person's right to privacy when officials take unreasonable searches on ones phone. For example, if one person has evidence on social media about their personal actions, officials should not be allowed to use it against them for it is invading their privacy. “Schools do not have the right to monitor what students do online outside of school” says Akasha Bagaria. I think that this is true because I personally would not want people looking through my things and using it against me. In addition, if officers are looking through people's devices, they could be looking through the wrong person's personal belongings. “People snooping violates the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures” says Gregory Diaz. I think people snooping around people's phones not only breaks the Fourth Amendment but also gets into people's business and privacy. …show more content…
“Many people believe schools have the right to punish students if their internet activity leads to bullying or class disruptions.” However, it is more on the parents side to take care of their students actions. “Others think that punishing students for what they do on the web is the responsibility of parents, not schools.” “Kids should not be misbehaving on social networking sites in the first place.” Officials should not be able to unreasonably search people's phones for it is breaking the Fourth Amendment. Searching people’s cell phones for crime is abusing the rights to freedom of speech. I want officials and schools to stop worrying about other people’s lives and snooping in their phones. It is extremely rude and is invading

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (The Free Dictionary 2013)…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People charged with violations of the Patriot Act that involve internet users have had their Fourth Amendment rights violated by secret searches which is the government’s ability to search private property without notice to the owner and by trap and trace searches which collects addressing information about the origin and destination of communications not just the content. By the government using the secret searches they are able to find information that is not always available on the internet or outside of your computer or your home.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Riley v. California

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the case Riley v California the court made the decision that the police must have a warrant in order to search cell phones, even in a case of arrest. If any data that is not in the warrant is obtained an officer must get rid of it. To obtain a warrant there must need to be an emergency or demanding circumstance. The court emphasized that the fact that cellphones now allows an individual to carry so much information in their hands does not makes it less valuable and still needs protection. This decision is now added to the fourth amendment and covers cellphone rights.…

    • 561 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According the Fourth Amendment, “protection applies only to situations where an individual has a subjective expectation of private that society willingly recognizes as reasonable” (Maras, 2015, p. 84). Thanks to the decision in the Katz v. United States case, the “reasonable expectation of privacy” test is used to established when law enforcement are allowed to conduct a search that does not violate one’s privacy (Maras, 2015). Information that is meant to be private and is contained in technology devices can be protected under the Fourth Amendment because the person’s intentions are to keep the information from the public (Maras, 2015). For example, in the Katz case there was a phone conversation that was admitted as evidence, but later found…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    government tracking

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Do you know who is tracking your movements when your turn on your cell phone, or what is being done with that information? These are questions that I recently had to ask myself after reading two insightful articles. The first was by Ronald Bailey called “Your Cellphone is Spying on You” and the other was by Terry J. Allen entitled “Reach Out and Track Someone”. In Ronald Bailey’s article, he explores the use of cellular phone tracking technology by law enforcement and their recent attempts to expand the surveillance laws to include more use of cell phones to track users’ movements without their knowledge. In addition he gives us some perspective on the idea of a big brother watching over us by examining what a future built on limited privacy expectations might look like. Allen gives us his personal perspective on tracking technology and explores abuses that might arise if we continue down the current path. Both of these articles have given me insight into the use of tracking technology and make me question both the moral and legal ramifications of sharing information related to personal movement. There is in fact a moral and legal balance that satisfies the need to protect the privacy of law abiding citizens, prosecute criminals, and protect family and friends through the use of cell phone tracking all at the same time, and the name we give to that solution is the constitution.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The 4th Amendment is extremely important to our country. This amendment in the United States Constitution provides the right for people to be secure in their own person, paper, and home, protects against unreasonable search and seizures, and states that no warrant will be issued without probable cause. 4th Amendment laws are more strict than any other amendment, and leaves absolutely no wiggle room to allow changes. Despite these strict laws being in place the government is at war with Apple because Apple encrypts everything to make a very good security, and they say allowing the government into people's phones would be against the 4th Amendment. 4th Amendment laws are very important, and should be followed closely. The 4th Amendment helps…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    NSA Pros And Cons

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    However the U. S. Constitution contains no actual right to privacy. The constitution only protects certain aspects of the individual.In the constitution certain amendments state only some things to be private not all. Some examples being, officials not being able to search your home without probable cause and no government involvement in making personal decisions. There is no actual right to overall privacy so the NSA has a right to go through different forms of communications in order to keep the people…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment provides the people of the United States, the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. Against unreasonable searches, and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons and things to be seized” (U.S Constitutional Amendments, 1972). The design of this Amendment is to create a type of barrier in order to protect individual rights to privacy, also preventing illegal search, and seizure of personal property. These search warrants are in…

    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The NSA is not listening to Americans' phone calls or monitoring their emails” (Does the Government). As the government states they are permitted to collect any Americans communications The Fourth Amendment protects your privacy, for instance the police cannot search personal properties. Due to the definition of "the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers,” it makes people feel secure (Legal Information). In addition, it prevents all irrelevant searches that are not useful. On the other hand the Fourth Amendment makes it challenging for law enforcement to gather information. The Fourth Amendment is beneficial to citizens: it protects privacy, makes people feel secure, and deters searches, although it makes amassing evidence more arduous for the law-enforcement community.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." -Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution (4)…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Navigating the Fourth Amendment and the law of warrantless searches and seizures largely involves case law rather than statutes, and today’s principles are the results of more than 200 years of judicial evolution. The constitution has been the back bone of the United States legal system since it was first written and signed by our founding fathers. This document has been the topic of many debates and has gone through many changes and clarifications throughout the years. The Fourth Amendment of the constitution is one of the most debated amendments.…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Search and Seizure

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the law before search and seizure was added, the Fourth Amendment protected privacy of citizens completely and securely. The Fourth Amendment blocked out law enforcement completely. So, to have access to suspicions persons the government added Search and Seizure to the law. The problem with this is that some people get their privacy violated, and then later it is found out that they were not responsible for anything. Even though there are many risks, the amount of arrest of criminals far out way the risks of mistakes.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Before federal agents take surveillance and seize phone calls or records from a person they must first have a good reason or evidence to do so. This follows the idea of probable cause listed above. Next, before agents can seize anything they must issue a warrant and have it approved. This way they can’t just see anybody’s information that they want to. Here is a quote from a heritage.org writer on the Patriot Act’s constitutionality. “ No single provision of the Patriot Act has ever been found unconstitutional. This is a testament to the act’s limited applicability, procedural safeguards, and extensive oversight…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social Media Speech

    • 1134 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social networking websites can be utilised as a beneficial tool to keep in touch with friends and to communicate and interact with people across the globe. Thus, it has become very popular particularly amongst teenagers to interact and connect with others online. However, it must be mandatory in schools to educate students on the correct and safe access of social media. It must be compulsory for children to learn about the consequences of social media, as it is a potentially damaging and destructive environment, which can lead to a variety of issues including mental illness, addiction and cyberbullying.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays