Preview

The History and Significance of the Fourth Amendment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1361 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The History and Significance of the Fourth Amendment
THE HISTORY AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." -Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution (4) A search as described in the Constitution is defined as when an expectation of privacy that society considers reasonable is infringed by a governmental employee or by an agent of the government. A seizure refers to the interference with an individual’s possessory interest in property. To meet the criteria of an unreasonable seizure, the property’s owner must have had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the items seized. (2) The 4th Amendment to the United States Constitution was added as part of the Bill of Rights on December 15, 1791. It deals with protecting people from the searching of their homes and private property without properly executed search warrants. In 1604, Judge Sir Edward Coke first identified this right in England. In the case of Semayne (v. England) the judge ruled that, "The house of every one is to him as his castle and fortress, as well for his defense against injury and violence as for his repose." He determined that subjects of the kingdom had the right to protection even from the king's representatives in cases of illegal search and seizure. He also noted conversely, that lawfully conducted searches were perfectly acceptable. The precedence this case established has remained a part of English law up until today. (1) The most noteworthy English case dealing with the right to freedom from illegal search and seizure is Entick vs. Carrington, 1765. Royal representatives acting on the orders of Lord Halifax had broken into the home of a private citizen named John

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution requires that no search or seizure shall be carried out unless a warrant has been issued. The exceptions are: searches with consent, frisks, plain feel/plain view, incident to arrest, automobile exceptions, exigent circumstances and open fields, abandoned property and public place exceptions (Harr, Hess, 2006, p. 219).…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Search and Seize Paper

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The most famous search and seizure is Mapp v. Ohio. This case happens back in 1961, March 29 and end on June 19, 1961. Which were an unreasonable searches and seizures what relates on the fourth Amendment. When the police received a tip that Dollree Mapp and her daughter were harboring a suspected bombing fugitive, they immediately went to her house and demanded entrance. Mapp called her attorney and under his advice she refused to give them entry because they did not have a warrant. Later on that day more officers came to her door and demanded that they be allowed to enter her house. After Mapp refused, they opened a door to the house through forced entry. Knock down her door completely. Mapp confronted them and demanded to see the search warrant. The police waved a piece of paper in the air claiming it was the warrant and Mapp grabbed it and put it down her shirt. The police eventually got the "warrant" back from Mapp. Also when the cop took the paper back for the warrant for her Mapp was taking a deep thought on how was that was right for him to not let her see the information about the warrant. Next, Mapp was cuffed her feet and went on to search her entire house for the fugitive. When they reached her basement they found a trunk containing a small collection of pornographic books, pictures, and photographs. Mapp said the trunk was left in the basement by a previous tenant and was not aware of its contents. The officers arrested Mapp for violating an Ohio law which prohibited the possession of obscene material. On her arrest she knows the laws for Ohio but they didn’t even give her time to discuss or tell who use to live in their home before her. No fugitive or any evidence of one was ever found at the house. Nothing but pic what Mapp didn’t have a clue who they belong to. At her trial in the Court room, Mapp was charged based on the evidence that was presented by the police. Mapp's attorney questioned the police about the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4th Amendment Case Study

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain the two-fold requirement discussed in Katz v. United States, for analyzing when a search occurs under the 4th Amendment.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A search occurs when an expectation of privacy that society considers reasonable is infringed by a governmental employee or by an agent of the government. Private individuals who are not acting in either capacity are exempt from the Fourth Amendment prohibitions. A seizure refers to the interference with an individual 's possessory interest in property. To meet the definition of an unreasonable seizure, the property 's owner must have had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the items seized. A person is seized when law enforcement personnel use physical force to restrain the person if a reasonable person in the same or a similar situation would not feel free to leave the situation. The previous owner of abandoned property cannot allege an unreasonable seizure of that abandoned property. Abandoned property is property left behind by its owner in a manner in which the owner abandons the possessory interest in the property and no longer retains a reasonable expectation of privacy with regard to the search (Law School, 2013).…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Case Of Charles Katz

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages

    New Jersey v. TLO, 469 U.S. 325 (1985), student bag was search and the Fourth Amendment did not apply to her even though it was her personal bag and expectation of privacy was high but due to her being on public property she lost her right to privacy. She was prosecuted but he was able to get his evidence…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment in its drafted form, states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    American Search Case

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It was adopted as a response to the abuse of search warrants in the American Revolution. The debate of the definition of search has been challenged in many cases in the history of the United States and is brought up again in this case. The Supreme Court ruled that a search occurs only when a person expects privacy in the thing search and society beliefves that expectation is reasonable. This was decided in Katz v. United States in 1967. In Katz the Court ruled that a search had occurred when the government wiretapped a telephone booth. Now seizure is the other part of the 4th amendment. A Seizure of propert occurs when there is meaningful interference by the government with an individual's possessory interests. The exclusionary rule also falls under seizure. The exclusionary rule states that voluntary answers to questions given to officers are offered into evidence in a ciminal prosecution. The government may not detain and individual even momentarily without reasonable, objective grounds, with few exceptions. The refusal to listen or answers does not answer these grounds. The invasion on people's privacy is only minimal and is usually only in speical cases. Some of these…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    briana

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages

    judge would do this by writing general warrants, which allowed general search and seizure to happen. Massachusetts wrote a law in 1756 that banned these warrants, because tax collectors were abusing their powers by searching the colonists’ homes for illegal goods. These general warrants allowed any messenger or officer to search a suspected place without any evidence. It also allowed them to seize people without even saying what they did wrong or showing evidence of their wrongdoings. Virginia also banned the use of general warrants later due to other fears. Then on December 15,1791 the Fourth Amendment was added into the Bill of Rights…

    • 326 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are many cases of unreasonable search and seizures which exist. For example, if government officials were to go into a man’s house, whom they suspected of dealing Mariana, but didn’t have a good reason to believe so or a warrant, and had taken his illegal Mariana plants then that would be an example of unreasonable search and seizure. Another example of unreasonable search and seizure would be if police officers were to inspect a person’s car at a traffic stop and take belonging inside because they believe they were illegal possessions; this is unreasonable search and seizure because they did not have a good reason to search.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Constitution Amendment IV states, “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." “No person shall be disturbed in his private affairs, or his home invaded, without authority of law.” (Washington State Constitution, Article I, Section 7) The U.S. Constitution and the Washington State Constitution protect individual privacy by prohibiting unreasonable searches and seizures. The rights cover personal possessions and information individual store items on cell phones, computers, and…

    • 2085 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The history of the fourth amendment does not have a clear path. According to the history found in Search and Seizure and the Supreme Court, a study in constitutional interpretation,…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized” (Hudson, 2010, p.363). In this essay we will explore what is reasonableness under the Fourth Amendment. A discussion of consensual encounters vs. detentions concerning search and seizure, we will also discus important cases that shape the fundamentals procedures of search and seizure.…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States provides for a system of checks and balance among the legislative, judicial and executive branches of the government. There are 33 amendments to the United States Constitution that Congress proposed as ratification since the Constitution was in effect since 1789. The fourth amendment to the United States Constitution declares that people must be secure in their homes and their persons against unreasonable searches and seizures. Additionally, the fourth amendment is part of the Bill of Rights was adopted by Congress and became effective in 1791. The relationship the fourth amendment has to constitutional rights is having probable cause and any evidence obtained without a warrant, cannot be used in the justice system. The Fourth amendment was evident during a landmark case of Weeks vs. the United States in 1914.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment’s ultimate goal is the “provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions” (Legal Information). Therefore the Fourth Amendment gives everyone a right to their own privacy. Even though that it might seem like it would make it harder to gather information. The Fourth Amendment is "the right of the people to be secure in their persons.” In addition, the law enforcement only needs to be “supported by a probable cause” or an “arrest warrant,” to search a United States citizen. Although, the police officer could arrest a suspect to stop them from running away or to preserve evidence. Besides the Fourth Amendment is still beneficial for all United States…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays