Banking Concept Of Education Analysis
WHAT IS EDUCATION?
Paula Friere and Mark Edmondson try to explain the concept of education in two different perspectives. According to the banking concept of education, Friere brings out education as the mere act of depositing. In this regard, education involves the teacher depositing knowledge to the students while the students’ role is restricted to just absorbing, storing it and memorising whenever required to do so. According to his ideology, education is all about having the two extreme parties who at one end are ignorant while the other end is perceived as absolutely knowledgeable. The ignorant group is always presenting itself to the most knowledgeable group for the main aim of gaining something from them. This then justifies the existence …show more content…
According to him, the best teacher is the only one that has the key to the transformation of any student as he/she goes through the education system. He insists that the current education does not give the students a chance to redefine whom they are rather focusing much on delivery. He calls it the consumer mentality type of education. Institutions are in the rush of providing the massive experience by looking for the best teachers and tutors while the parents and students run into various institutions in the belief that they will gain the best from them. In today’s world, Edmundson ideology is quite evident. We have witnessed many colleges and schools rushing for the best experience and the best teachers in the world. With this they believe, will act as bait to get many students who only run to such institutions with the hope that they will get the best out of them. They do not take the time to sit down and ask themselves about what they want and what they want they want to be. No wonder it was termed as a consumer mentality type of education where both parties are just in the rush to …show more content…
The knowledge from the two ideologies is given by the so-called teachers who deposit and the role of the students are to memorise and produce it at any given time. It is, therefore, easy to note that both perspectives put teachers at the centre stage of education. Teachers are the ones considered to play a critical role in the education system than any other person in the system. Students only come into play by making sure that gain from the knowledge given by teachers to them. In that case, we can conclude that the monopoly of education has been overtaken by teachers who are now seen as the controllers of the whole concept of education and their say is final. They are also the determiners of the students’ fate as according to Friere; they have the whole impact of filling the heads of the most ignorant group, thus the students. Edmundson, on the other hand, comes up with the same idea but his, in this case, emphasizes the need to get the best teachers to mould best students. All the ideas give the teachers a very key role in determining the future lives of their
Paula Friere and Mark Edmondson try to explain the concept of education in two different perspectives. According to the banking concept of education, Friere brings out education as the mere act of depositing. In this regard, education involves the teacher depositing knowledge to the students while the students’ role is restricted to just absorbing, storing it and memorising whenever required to do so. According to his ideology, education is all about having the two extreme parties who at one end are ignorant while the other end is perceived as absolutely knowledgeable. The ignorant group is always presenting itself to the most knowledgeable group for the main aim of gaining something from them. This then justifies the existence …show more content…
According to him, the best teacher is the only one that has the key to the transformation of any student as he/she goes through the education system. He insists that the current education does not give the students a chance to redefine whom they are rather focusing much on delivery. He calls it the consumer mentality type of education. Institutions are in the rush of providing the massive experience by looking for the best teachers and tutors while the parents and students run into various institutions in the belief that they will gain the best from them. In today’s world, Edmundson ideology is quite evident. We have witnessed many colleges and schools rushing for the best experience and the best teachers in the world. With this they believe, will act as bait to get many students who only run to such institutions with the hope that they will get the best out of them. They do not take the time to sit down and ask themselves about what they want and what they want they want to be. No wonder it was termed as a consumer mentality type of education where both parties are just in the rush to …show more content…
The knowledge from the two ideologies is given by the so-called teachers who deposit and the role of the students are to memorise and produce it at any given time. It is, therefore, easy to note that both perspectives put teachers at the centre stage of education. Teachers are the ones considered to play a critical role in the education system than any other person in the system. Students only come into play by making sure that gain from the knowledge given by teachers to them. In that case, we can conclude that the monopoly of education has been overtaken by teachers who are now seen as the controllers of the whole concept of education and their say is final. They are also the determiners of the students’ fate as according to Friere; they have the whole impact of filling the heads of the most ignorant group, thus the students. Edmundson, on the other hand, comes up with the same idea but his, in this case, emphasizes the need to get the best teachers to mould best students. All the ideas give the teachers a very key role in determining the future lives of their