Preview

Balanced Score for the Balanced Scorecard: a Benchmarking Tool

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
10394 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Balanced Score for the Balanced Scorecard: a Benchmarking Tool
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1463-5771.htm

BIJ 15,4

Balanced score for the balanced scorecard: a benchmarking tool
M. Punniyamoorthy
Faculty of Production and Operations and Finance, Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India, and

420

R. Murali
Faculty of Human Resources and Finance, Department of Management Studies, National Institute of Technology, Tiruchirappalli, India
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to create a model called “Balanced score for the balanced score card” and to provide an objective benchmarking indicator for evaluating the achievement of the strategic goals of the company. Design/methodology/approach – The paper uses the concepts of “Balanced scorecard” proposed by Robert. S. Kaplan and David P. Norton. This paper also adopts the model given by Brown P.A. and Gibson D.F. and the extension to the model provided by P.V. Raghavan and M. Punniyamoorthy. Preference theory is used to calculate the relative weightage for each factor, using the process of pair wise comparison. The balanced score for balanced scorecard provides a single value by taking into account all the essential objective and subjective factors – be it financial or non-financial. It also provides a suitable weightages for those parameters. The target performance and the actual performance are compared and the analysis is made. Findings – Information from a leading organization was obtained and the balanced score for a balance scorecard was calculated for that organization. The variations were analyzed through this model. The depth and objectivity in the analysis is highlighted. Research limitations/implications – This provides a single bench marking measure to evaluate how far the firm had been successful in achieving the strategies. The paper has adopted the preference theory which limits the weightage to be accorded to the factors concerned.



References: Analyst (2001), “Accounting for intangibles Skandia reporting model”, Analyst, October. Best Practices LLC (1999), Best Practices Bench Marking Report, Developing the Balanced Scorecard, Best Practices LLC, Chapel Hill, NC. Brown, P.A. and Gibson, D.F. (1972), “A quantified model for facility site selection application to the multi product location problem”, AIIE Transactions, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 1-10. Corrigan, T.D. (n.d.), “Capital budgeting in the context of the balanced score card”, available at: www.iaes.org/conferences/past/philadelphia Dye, R.W. (2003), “Keeping score”, CMA Management, 18-23 December/January. Evans, M.H. (n.d.), “The balanced scorecard”, available at: www.exinfm.com/training Hope, J. and Fraser, R. (n.d.), “Beyond budgeting”, BBRT, CAM-I, Europe White paper. Jhonson, G. and Scholes, K. (2001), Exploring Corporate Strategy, Text & Cases, 4th ed., Prentice-Hall, India, pp. 1-38. Kaplan, R.S. (1996), Mobil USM & R (a): Linking the Balanced Scorecard, Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, 9-197-025 – 6.l. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992a), “The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January/February, pp. 71-9. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1992b), The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (n.d.), The Strategy Focused Organizations, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, pp. 1-30, 369-80. Lingle, J.H. and Schiemann, W.A. (1996), “From balanced scorecards to strategic gages: is measurement worth it?”, Management Review, March, pp. 56-62. Miller, A. (1998), Strategic Management, 3rd ed., Irwin Mc-Graw Hill International Edition, New York, NY, pp. 313-45. Porter, M.E. (1985), Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, Free Press, New York, NY. Porter, M.E. (1996), “What is strategy”, Harvard Business Review, November/December, p. 62. Ragavan, P.V. and Punniyamoorthy, M. (2003), “Strategic decision model for the justification of technology selection”, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol. 21, pp. 72-8. Skandia Reporting Model (2001), Skandia Reporting Model: Accounting for Intangibles – Edited Excerpts from the Supplement to Annual Report 1994, Skandia – Analyst, October. Stewart, A.C. and Hubin, J.C. (2001), “The balanced scorecard: beyond reports and rankings”, Planning for Higher Education, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 37-42. Stewart, T. (1999), “The status of communication today”, Journal of Strategic Communication Management, FebruaryMarch, pp. 22-5. About the authors M. Punniyamoorthy is a Graduate in Mathematics, with a BTech in Production Technology from Madras Institute of Technology, Chennai, and MTech in Industrial Engineering and Operations Research from Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. He possesses ICWAI (inter) qualification and did his Doctorate in Management from Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirapalli. He is presently working as an Assistant Professor in the National Institute of Technology. One of his papers “A strategic decision model for the justification of technology selection” published in the International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, UK (Vol. 21, 2003, pp. 72-8) has been selected by the American Society for Mechanical Engineers as one of the best ten papers in the area of technology selection. M. Punniyamoorthy is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: punniya@nitt.edu R. Murali is a Post Graduate in Mathematics and has a Management Degree from Indhira Ghandhi National Open University. He is also a cost accountant and is presently a Fellow in the Institute of Cost and Works Accountants of India, which is the apex body of cost accountants in India. He has worked in one of the biggest Nationalized Banks of India having a large network of branches in India and abroad for more than 26 years and has also served for more than ten years in the staff training college of the bank handling in the areas of credit and human resources. He is presently working as a Lecturer in the National Institute of Technology in cost and management accounting, financial management, economics, strategic management and human resources related topics. Balanced score for the balanced scorecard 443 To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In order to align its management processes, and ensure the organization as a whole is focused on the implementation of a long term strategy, the organization must ensure that they have a balanced scorecard (Kaplan & Norton, 2007). A framework is provide by the balanced scorecard to ensure the successful implementation of the company’s strategy, while simultaneously allowing the strategy to evolve in order to respond to any changes in the company’s technological, market, and competitive environments (Kaplan & Norton, 2007).…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan, R. & Norton, D. (2007, July-August). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from the ABI/INFORM database.…

    • 4099 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Authors: Neena Nanda Assistant Professor ITM Business School Plot No.25/26, Institutional Area, Sector 4, Kharghar East Navi Mumbai-410210 (M) +919820926977 neenan@itm.edu neena.nanda@gmail.com Ms Prachi Gupta Assistant Professor ITM Business School Plot No.25/26, Institutional Area, Sector 4, Kharghar East Navi Mumbai-410210 (M) +917738281009 prachigupta@itm.edu prachi70@indiatimes.com…

    • 5246 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Balanced Score Card

    • 747 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This paper is a manner of having a balanced score card so that all angles of the company will be maintained and one does not become more important than the other does. When the scorecard is balanced then it is almost impossible for one part of the company to lack the attention that it needs. When the scorecard is properly balanced it is possible that a proper strategic plan is in place.…

    • 747 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P., Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, Harvard Business Review, January-February 1996, 75-85. Available from: http://scholar.google.co.uk [Accessed 23 February 2013]…

    • 3030 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many companies adopted early balanced-scorecard concepts to improve their performance measurement systems. They achieved tangible but narrow results. Adopting those concepts provided clarification, consensus, and focus on the desired improvements in performance. More recently, we have seen companies expand their use of the balanced scorecard, employing it as the foundation of an integrated and iterative strategic management system. Companies are using the scorecard to: clarify and update strategy, communicate strategy…

    • 1453 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Balanced Scorecard is a comprehensive framework to achieve the company’s vision and strategy. In addition to measuring the financial side, the work surface also is added to make up for traditional performance evaluation, which emphasizing on financial data. Therefore, the Balanced Scorecard can be said a new system of strategic management with the company strategy, vision and performance evaluation, and not just a performance evaluation system. The Balanced Scorecard is divided into four important perspectives, including financial perspective, customer perspective, internal perspective and innovation and learning perspective. Organizations design performance indices basis on the perspectives to measure the performance, the entire sector information and the organization 's strategy and vision, which are matched together to achieve goals. It is to balance the implementation of organizational performance, seeking short-term and long-term goals, financial and non-financial measurable, and the balance between the performance of the external and internal perspectives (Kaplan and Norton, 1996).…

    • 2503 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    * Assistant Professor, Department of Business Management, Post Graduate Centre, Lal Bahadur College, S.P Road, Warangal – 506007. India. E – Mail: - vermasricherala@gmail.com…

    • 2877 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    One of the biggest challenges in organisational management is measuring performance comprehensively, as well as implementing and executing organisational strategy effectively. The inception of Balanced Scorecard (BSC) dramatically contributes to address these issues, as it provides a useful performance measurement approach, and most importantly, a strategic management and control system. Therefore the BSC was widely adopted in practice and treated as one of the most valuable innovations in 20th century (Bible et al, 2006). The purpose of this report is to explore the aims of BSC set out to achieve, then evaluating the extent to which BSC has achieved its goals. In additional, this report focuses on investigating the reason why BSC has widely adopted through out the world and achieved such a high degree of acclaim.…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This assignment will discuss on how balanced scorecard is used to evaluate the performance of a company in particular a business unit. Prior to evaluate the company’s performance, I will first explain the term balanced scorecard and also the rationale of the objectives chosen for each perspective so as to ensure that the assessment of the company’s performance is quantifiable as well as reliable and comparable to other companies in the same industry.…

    • 1449 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Balanced Scorecard approach forces organizations to design key performance indicators for their various strategic objectives. This ensures that companies are measuring what actually matters. Research supports this as companies with a Balanced Scorecard approach tend to report higher quality of their management information as well as increasing benefits form the way this information is used to guide management insights and strategic decision making.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Balance Scorecard Overview

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Douglas Scherer June 17, 2002 Introduction Without metrics, management can be a nebulous if not impossible exercise. How can we tell if we have met our goals if we don 't know what our goals are? How do we know if our business strategies are effective if they have not been well defined? The balanced scorecard as documented by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton in the Harvard Business Review article The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance1 describes a methodology used for measuring success and setting goals from financial and operational viewpoints. With those measures, leaders can manage their strategic vision and adjust it for change. This paper will provide a brief overview of the balanced scorecard. Balanced Scorecard Mechanics The balanced scorecard (which saw its initial development during the years of 1987 - 19922) links performance measures by looking at a business 's strategic vision from four different perspectives: financial, customer, innovation and learning, and internal business processes. These four perspectives do not eliminate, but instead support the goals of various management techniques (such as Strategic Planning, Total Quality Management, and Core Competence) employed during the several decades surroundings the balanced scorecard 's appearance. Each of the four perspectives is considered by four parameters. Those parameters are: • Goals: What do we need to achieve to become successful • Measures: What parameters will we use to know if we are successful • Targets: What quantitative value will we use to determine success of the measure • Initiatives: What will we do to meet our goals In the original paper of 1992, Goals and Measures are the only two parameters shown on the scorecard. Since then, it is often seen with the additional two parameters, Targets and Initiatives.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Kaplan, R.S. and Norton D.P. (1992), “The balanced scorecard – measures that drive performance”, Harvard Business Review, January – February, pp.71-9.…

    • 2711 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since the Balanced Scorecard was developed in the 1990’s by Robert Kaplan and David Norton (1992), it has gained in popularity amongst academics and practitioners. In 1990, Kaplan and Norton led a research study of a lot of companies with the purpose of exploring the new methods of performance management. The importance of the study was an increasing belief that the financial measures of performance management were not as effective as before with the development of modern business enterprise. Representatives involved in the study companies, including the researchers Kaplan and Norton, were persuaded that the reliance on financial measures of performance had an effect on their ability to create value. After deep discussions the group brainstormed on several alternatives but finally settled on the balanced scorecard, which featured performance measures, customer issues, internal business processes, employee activities, and shareholder concerns. Kaplan and Norton introduced the new tool as the Balanced Scorecard and summarized the concepts of the study in the first of three Harvard Business Review articles, “The Balanced Scorecard-Measures That Drive Performance”.…

    • 6491 Words
    • 26 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miyake, D. (2002), Implementing Strategy with the Balanced Scorecard: An Introduction to the Strategy-Focused Organization, DM Review.…

    • 18329 Words
    • 74 Pages
    Powerful Essays