Preview

Arthur Miller's 'New Covenant Of Grace'

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
208 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arthur Miller's 'New Covenant Of Grace'
Arthur Miller, a prominent playwright in the 1900s, wrote an article in 1992 on executions and the manner in which they should be carried out. Miller writes that executions should be done in the manner of the Greeks and Romans, a public spectacle. The proposition is to set up an execution in a stadium, and have people pay to watch, with the money going to various organizations and the government.
From Miller’s humanistic view of the article, it makes plenty of sense, but the Christian perspective says otherwise. Under the new covenant of grace, the punishments listed in the old testament law are no longer necessary to maintain peace with God. Jesus paid the ultimate price for everyones’ sins, including capital crimes. Life is sacred and murder

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “ Chronicle Of An American Execution”, written by Dan Barry, is a very powerful and descriptive writing which illustrates an cruel execution by electrocution that took place in the state of Tennessee in 2007. Third person narrative, imagery and word choice are the three techniques Dan skillfully uses throughout his essay as a result to create strong and unforgettable impressions and pictures in the reader’s minds; These rhetorical devices not only lively portray physical characteristics, but also directly present the concrete ruthless details of the execution and effectively contribute dominant impression upon the readers. Dan uniquely starts off his essay with a brief description talking about…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The readings over Bonhoeffer and the Confessing Church challenged my understanding of grace and murder. I was shocked that as steadfast Christians and instructors of the word Bonhoeffer and his co-conspirators were fine with the consequences of killing Adolf Hitler, even if that meant spending an eternity in hell, to save the millions being killed in the Nazi concentration camps. In the church I’ve learned the ten commandments and here at Abilene Christian University I’ve studied over Jesus’ Sermon on the Mount. Because of my studies, I know God says, “You shall not murder” (Exodus 20:13, ESV) and Jesus says, “‘But I say to you that everyone who is angry with his brother will be liable to judgment; whoever insults his brother will be liable…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Summary

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to the author the modern executioner's job has changed, likewise, the death penalty has also changed. Jeffrey Toobin suggests killing prisoners who are on death row is necessitated but harm should not be caused. The author believes that the death penalty is uncivilized in our civilized society. Toobin also affirms the fact that the death penalty has become unpalatable and gruesome because of the great length's states have gone to come up with other ways of execution. For…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Before the official separation of Church and State, religious leaders in America held most of the power. Therefore, religion-bound ideas bled into the natural flow of human thinking, and the two were intertwined. Exploring classic literature can help illustrate the two-strand rope of human thought, especially by studying and interpreting Puritan-era works like The Scarlet Letter by Nathaniel Hawthorne, “The Crucible” by Arthur Miller, and “Sinners in the Hands of An Angry God” by Jonathan Edwards. Although theological ethics are significant motivators towards personal choice in these three works, so are humanistic ethics, leading to conflict between the two ideas.…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Revered Post says that as Christians, the people of Holcomb should not use capital punishment, especially not against Smith and Hickock, who he says deserve time to repent. The Christian values that are preached are not followed though because crimes against the Clutters committed by Smith and Hickock are so despicable that even the devout Christians of Holcomb are willing to go against their religious beliefs to punish Smith and…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay shows us what we would uncover if we saw where the government was being completely transparent. In “Executions Should be Televised” the question of how some people are executed comes up. In “The Death Penalty,” Bruck answers that question when he writes about a man named Joseph Carl Shaw, a former military policeman who helped murder two teenagers while suffering from a mental illness and being high off of PCP (Bruck 490). Shaw was executed by the electric chair, a contraption that was built over 100 years ago (Bruck 490). With today’s medical advancements and technologies however, there are plenty of ways to perform an execution that does not cause severe pain. By executing a man in such a barbaric way, Bruck shows the reader how their constitutional right defined by the 8th amendment, that “cruel and unusual punishments [should not be] inflicted,” is being ignored (“Bill of Rights of the United States of…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genesis 9:6: "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man." They believe that capital punishment was created by God and man didn't have the right to oppose. However, the bible also talks about an eye for an eye. This proverb means one cannot get even with one who harmed them. The government supports killing a murderer as a punishment for him committing murder. It is a double standard and ineffective. (Vollum, S., Longmire, D. R., & Buffington-Vollum, J)…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Ultimate Punishment, Van Den Haag talks about the death penalty in the United States and takes the stance that it is morally justifiable and sometimes needs to be a punishment that is used to gain retribution. He states, “It ends the existence of those punished, instead of temporarily imprisoning them.” A murderer has taken away the lives of other people, as well as punishing the family members indirectly causing them pain. Therefore not only is this retribution to the person who was killed, but also to the people that the victim was survived by.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The fact that colonial Americans held public executions to employ moral lessons to public intrigued me. Until now, I assumed that public executions during the colonial period were held only to entertain people. It is still disturbing to me, however, that colonial Americans tried to promote an execution to their own use. Such discriminations seemed to be common at that period of time.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Half Way Covenant

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Halfway Covenant was a form of partial church membership created by New England Puritans in 1662. It was promoted in particular by the Reverend Solomon Stoddard, who felt that the people of the English colonies were drifting away from their original religious purpose. First-generation settlers were beginning to die out, while their children and grandchildren often expressed less religious piety, and more desire for material wealth.…

    • 395 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The history of the death penalty can be traced back in time all the way to the fifth century B.C. through Roman’s Law of the Twelve Tablets, where people would be put to death through crucifixion, drowning, and even by being burnt alive.. From there it can be found in seventh B.C.’s Draconian Code, and even in eighteenth century B.C. through the Code of King Hammurabi of Babylon, in which twenty-five various crimes would lead to the death penalty (Part I, 2015). Though the crimes punishable under the death penalty and the methods of which the death penalty have changed over time, the ideology behind the method still stands the same: An eye for an eye. The argument for the death penalty stands that those who commit a crime such as capital murder should be punished the same way that they punished their victim: by death. However, while this ethical principle may sound clear and cut on paper, the stance-both for and against-and methodology behind the death penalty is much more complicated than that.…

    • 2028 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Goals Of Sentencing

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Once meted, its effect is final and not reversible. It should be preserved as a sanction against offenders who commit heinous crimes, were there is a loss of life. This perspective is supported by the Bible, in Genesis 9:6, which states, “Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed.” The bible also states in Exodus 21:16, “And he that stealeth a man, he shall surely be put to death.” However, certain verses in the bible can also be interpreted as support for the abolishment of capital punishment. These include Romans 13:9 which states “…Thou shalt not kill…” and John 8:3-11, in which, Jesus, rejects Moses law of adultery, for which the punishment is stoning to death. This is consistent with the view that capital punishment is murder, cruel, and…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Death Penalty In Canada

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages

    As this form of justice existed prior to the Old Covenant, the argument that the New Covenant supersedes the death penalty is invalid. As well, the New Testament confirms the prescription of the death penalty. Paul states in Acts 25:11, when before Festus, “If... I am guilty of doing anything deserving death, I do not refuse to die.” Paul acknowledges the validity of capital punishment, even post Old Covenant. Opponents of the death penalty also use the actions of Jesus in regard to the adulteress in John 8. However, we must realize two facts about this case. One, the Pharisees were clearly trying to trap Jesus between Roman and Jewish law. If Jesus had given his consent to the execution, he would have broken Roman law. Had he denied the validity of capital punishment, he would have broken Jewish law. Secondly, and more importantly, Jesus knew that the case had not followed proper prescribed practices. If, as the Pharisees claimed, “this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act” (John 8:4), there must have been a man involved. Jesus sees through the hypocrisy of the Pharisees and artfully removes himself from the horns of a dilemma that he had been placed on. This scenario is by no means a valid argument against the death penalty.…

    • 1420 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    leave it up to God to deal with their punishments later. Also the ten commandents list if murder…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    get it right

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages

    P/A3.) I think that Miller’s main purpose in the essay is to persuade his readers. If privatize executions was viewable by the public it could change people…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays