Preview

Argumentative Essay: Should We Bring Back Species Wiped Out?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
689 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Argumentative Essay: Should We Bring Back Species Wiped Out?
There are many questions that humans have been asking for years, one of them being, should scientists bring back species humanity has wiped out? Everyone has their own opinion on this subject, just as they do in every other situation. Some exclaim “Yes! Is that even a question?” while others wholeheartedly disagree. What’s my opinion? Should we bring back species humanity has wiped out, if so which one? I have no answer for this question, directly. I can say, with certainty, that we should not bring any single species back. If we bring back one species, the earth could be thrown off balance due to the fact that it has adapted to life without them. Other species could be wiped out if that one we brought back was carnivorous, if it was a herbivore, plant species could be wiped out. There would be nothing to regulate the new animals population and it could completely take over.
On the other hand we could bring back all of the species humanity has wiped out. This though could be nearly impossible. First we would have to find way to create the species that humans have drove to extinction. Then we would have to release them in their natural
…show more content…
There are a great number of benefits to biodiversity, therefore I’ll only explain to you a few. First of all each species helps keep the ecosystem balanced. It’s like an assembly line. Everyone has their part to play and if we all do it well the end product will work smoothly. But, if one person, in this case entire species, fails to do their part, the product or ecosystem will not run properly. Each species has their part and biodiversity allows those parts to be played. Without it only there would be no assembly line and no end product.When the ecosystem is running smoothly the better chances of the earth population growing. The more species there are the easier it is for the different species to live. If there are more species the bigger the variety of food for

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Humans are the reason for the sixth extinction. Species are dropping at an incredibly fast rate. This is mostly because of climate change and ocean acidification affecting the planets biodiversity. As the climate changes animals are unable to adapt. For an example as the earth begins to warm, ice begins to melt, which will cause major harm for animals, including us. With the ice melting it will cause polar bears to have reduce access to food which will cause harm to their bodies and there cubs. These events are happening all over the world and humans are the only ones who can stop…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The possibility that mammoths, passenger pigeons, saber-toothed cats, and thylacine may roam the very earth our feet stand upon once again is a thrilling, yet apprehensive thought. Carl Zimmer proposes this very idea in his essay “Reviving Species” and gives feedback on the topic of de-extinction. According to Zimmer, de-extinction is defined as, “The notion of bringing vanished species back to life”, and he elaborates the pros and cons of actually completing this ordeal (31). Reading the differentiating views on the subject is very interesting, and caused me to think more and more as to if bringing back the extinct species is for the good or bad of our world. But as a firm believer in Christianity, I feel de-extinction is a sensitive subject and is “… playing God.”, especially if…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stuart Pimm offers a degree in Conservation Ecology from Duke University. His Argument focuses largely on humans are not ready for De-Extinction in that since humans were the ones that pushed them to disappear, they are not going to want those species back. He gives the example that “hunters at [the Pyrenean ibex] to extinction. Reintroduce a resurrected ibex to the area where it belongs and it will become the most expensive cabrito every eaten.” He notes that the problem is whether we can resurrect these species or not, but more along the lines of whether the rest of the population will accept the animals back in their original homes. He also believes that De-Extinction “seduces” those granting research money and support into thinking they are doing well when it simply gives “unscrupulous developers a veil to hide their rapaciousness, with promises to fix things later.”…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To go through with this, it would cost an arm and a leg, just to try and resurrect something, and it may not even work. As it said in Back From the Dead, even if it did work, they could become invasive and harm other living species. In Sarah Zielinski’s article, De-extinction probably isn’t worth it, she said it could harm up to 14 currently living species. In an article by Breanna Draxler, she told us that some of the extinct species could bring back retro diseases. Would you risk up to 14 species dying, just for one more species to be…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    So who cares if a bird or two goes extinct? Or an elephant? Or a bug? To most people it doesn’t really matter. But species extinction is a great moral wrong. Every species has a role in its ecosystem and by intruding on the natural balance of things and thus causing the early extinction of species we are throwing the natural balance out of whack and reducing biodiversity. Biodiversity is key in surviving ecological hardship. When difficult situations arise, it is up to species to adapt and evolve to overcome. By intervening and accelerating the hardship of not just one species, but entire ecosystems, we are creating so much stress of the species present that they simply cannot adapt or evolve quick enough in such a short span of time. Thus, human actions are directly responsible for the extinction of many species, which directly correlates to a decrease in genetic and biodiversity. It is hard to deny that we rely on, and take for granted, all of the species and their roles in their ecosystem and how they keep things afloat. And by irreparably damaging these systems, we are directly relating to our ability to gather supplies such as food sources and lumber and agriculture in the future. Thus it falls upon humanity to act accordingly to try and prevent the damage we will cause if we continue “business as usual” in the…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    passenger pigeon, and the great herds of bison that once roamed the prairie. The land was…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    All species, in some way shape or form, rely on other species, “everything is connected”. If one species is taken from this world, there will be a chain of events that follows, similar the the butterfly effect. If an organism such as the honeybee is removed, multiple species humans live off of like plants and animals will also die…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donlan et al, 2005, emphasizes that humans owe an ethical responsibility to redress the loss of megafauna during the Pleistocene era and to prevent further extinctions of extant megafauna. Humans…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The issue should never be about the extinction of any animal, it should always be about the cruelty and exploitation which will lead to their extinction,” unknown. Each and every animal on earth has as much right to be here as you, me, and of all humanity. Scientists have found a way to clone extinct species. The thought of that sounds amazing and really exciting, but think about it another way. If we bring back no longer existing animals, us humans will do what we do best, which is changing nature and destroying it, basically killing them for money or being greedy for food. According to text “no,” there are already many living things becoming extinct many times faster than normal. Why would we worry about animals who are already long gone when there are many other things that are important to the environment that we need to care about? Another reason why we should not bring them back is because our Earth has changed significantly since they were alive. Having them back would change many things. Lastly, education costs lots of money.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No to De Extinction

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The process of de-extinction or resurrection biology is in simple words, “the process of resurrecting species that have died out, or gone extinct” (Encyclopedia Britannica). While it may sound like a simple idea, it is anything but that. Stewart Brand, a professional environmentalist and futurist who is leading one of the biggest de-extinction projects, explains that there are three semi-successful techniques to…

    • 2107 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The answer to many diseases or symptoms, could be right in front of our faces. While other people are out for blood on this matter, most people don’t think that that is a good idea. Ridding the Earth of another species is like getting rid of a single important component in a machine. The world is affected by it and loses one of its many species causing whatever good that that species did to fall on the back of another, setting off many chain…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. I think we need to protect most, if not all, of the species, including some unattractive ones like snail darters. As mentioned in the book, we are now mostly focused on protecting “flagship” species, the species that look attractive to us as human beings. When we are amazed at the aesthetic value of those megafaunas like tigers and pandas, we are constantly forgetting the values of small animals like snail darters and many other pants. However, there are several reasons that we should protect those “unattractive species “too. The author of our book taught us that it is almost impossible to restore an extinct specie. When a specie of plants or animals actually disappear, with current technology, we have no way to bring them back. Also, those…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    De-extinction is a big step forward in science, de-extinction could provide us with knowledge of evolution and animals that we have never seen. It could also have a lot of environmental benefits such as some damaged ecosystems could be repaired by some extinct species of plants and animals. We can also redeem ourselves for what we have done to this planet we can bring back some animals and plants that are extinct because we made them go extinct. It can also be used to save the animals that are going extinct now so they won't die…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reanimate False Species

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The controversial issue that Please Reanimate and Do Not Reanimate address is that we can revive species that could possibly help our ecosystems and save modern day species of animals from going extinct; but on the other hand, reviving “extinct species poses a risk of selling the public on a false promise that technology alone can solve our ongoing environmental woes.” Reviving certain species could give ecosystems that depend on “keystone species” that have lost the species diversity they once had because some species no longer fit. And as environmental change occurs, ancient diversity may be needed again. The ability to reanimate extinct species would be perfect for this situation. But with the public rationalizing that researchers can…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When I started writing this forum reply I was focused only on the extinction rates of animals. While looking for resources I found articles talking about extinction rates of insects and plants throughout the world and how that will affect us as well. “We are confronting an episode of species extinction greater than anything the world has experienced for the past 65 million years. Of all the global problems that confront us, this is the one that is moving the most rapidly and the one that will have the most serious consequences. And, unlike other global ecological problems, it is completely irreversible” (Raven, as cited, McCarthy, 1997). It wasn’t that I wasn’t aware…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays