Preview

Pros And Cons Of Reviving Species By Carl Zimmer

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1083 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pros And Cons Of Reviving Species By Carl Zimmer
The possibility that mammoths, passenger pigeons, saber-toothed cats, and thylacine may roam the very earth our feet stand upon once again is a thrilling, yet apprehensive thought. Carl Zimmer proposes this very idea in his essay “Reviving Species” and gives feedback on the topic of de-extinction. According to Zimmer, de-extinction is defined as, “The notion of bringing vanished species back to life”, and he elaborates the pros and cons of actually completing this ordeal (31). Reading the differentiating views on the subject is very interesting, and caused me to think more and more as to if bringing back the extinct species is for the good or bad of our world. But as a firm believer in Christianity, I feel de-extinction is a sensitive subject and is “… playing God.”, especially if …show more content…
Just because something can be done doesn't mean it should be done. A little clone bucardo, named Celia, changed the world’s perspective on extinction in a matter of the ten struggling minutes. This trial that took place in 2003, where reproductive physiologists created a clone from the DNA of a now extinct animal, the bucardo, and implanted a number of eggs in 57 goats. Only one goat had a successful birth. Unfortunately, ten minutes after the bucardo clone was born, Celia, she had died because of a grown-in lobe on her lung. Since the cloning had occurred, scientist have been exploring and discovering new and improved ways to revive an extinct animal, and have found that it is, indeed, possible. Activists of de-extinction want to provide redemption to these creatures since we, as human beings, were the ones who destroyed their kind in the first place. Fernandez-Arias is one of the many researchers who is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I am writing in response to your request that I analyze Stewart Brand's “The Case for De-Extinction: Why We Should Bring Back the Woolly Mammoth” and make a recommendation for or against publication in The Shorthorn. I have considered the rhetorical appeals of Brand’s piece and determined that a large majority of students would find this to be unappealing due to the large amount of Christians, Catholics, Muslims, and other religious groups on campus, so therefore, it should not be published. This topic is very controversial and most likely will not persuade the UTA community in agreeing with Brand’'s viewpoints.…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Garner combines an examination of the politics and philosophy of the issues relating animals and the nature. The book includes major theoretical and empirical incidents such as the campaigns and public controversies over the export of live animals and the use of animals in research, the impact of genetic engineering on animals and the latest developments in the debate over…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Levine, Aaron D. (January 2009). "Animal cloning in the twenty-first century". Cloning. World Issues Today. Rosen Publishing Group. p. 77. ISBN 1435851684.…

    • 1944 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “The Letter to the Southern Baptist Minister” forced me to raise a number of questions. Rather often, we think of environmental issues as related to political ideology or connect them to personal religious identities, which confuses the matter. In his letter, E.O. Wilson asks this pastor to remove that confusion, and, while they hold different worldviews, to consider his position. Wilson further proposes that both Christian and non-religious individuals can hold a humanist belief of conservation. Whether an individual holds that creation is the offspring of a creator and should be preserved as a work of his genius, or that the world should be preserved because it is the only source of sustenance for the human race for the foreseeable future, they can mutually agree that conservation will have positive effects and that this masterpiece of biology should be preserved. As exemplified by the people of Easter Island, we should not allow ourselves to overuse natural resources, because of not only destruction caused to nature but also because of the negative effects which would be given to our ancestors.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When scientist clone a certain animal or thing they always do it for very different reasons and their ideals are different. “The advantage of therapeutic cloning in medical treatment is that it would allow doctors to grow replacements for missing and damaged parts for their patients.” (Positive And Negative Effects of Cloning” 7).…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Documentary Framework

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Ritchie, E. (2013). 'Extinction: just how bad is it and why should we care?', 2 May 2013, The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/extinction-just-how-bad-is-it- and-why-should-we-care-13751?…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Jurassic Park, a cult favorite, seems to be a scary work of fiction. What most do not realize is that there are efforts taking place right now to make the processes of reversing extinction a reality. This process, coined as ‘De-Extinction,’ is defined as using intact tissues of extinct animals to clone them and introduce them back into existing ecosystems. These efforts are taking place all over the world: the United States of America, Australia, Poland, and Russia. (Zimmer, 2013) This process includes taking fragmented DNA from preserved specimens, piecing the fragments together, placing the DNA in an emptied egg, and planting the egg in a female of similar lineage to the species being cloned. (Archer, 2013) The first attempt at this process was in 2003 when Spanish scientists attempted to clone the cells of the last Pyrenean ibex, Celia. The…

    • 1761 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    So who cares if a bird or two goes extinct? Or an elephant? Or a bug? To most people it doesn’t really matter. But species extinction is a great moral wrong. Every species has a role in its ecosystem and by intruding on the natural balance of things and thus causing the early extinction of species we are throwing the natural balance out of whack and reducing biodiversity. Biodiversity is key in surviving ecological hardship. When difficult situations arise, it is up to species to adapt and evolve to overcome. By intervening and accelerating the hardship of not just one species, but entire ecosystems, we are creating so much stress of the species present that they simply cannot adapt or evolve quick enough in such a short span of time. Thus, human actions are directly responsible for the extinction of many species, which directly correlates to a decrease in genetic and biodiversity. It is hard to deny that we rely on, and take for granted, all of the species and their roles in their ecosystem and how they keep things afloat. And by irreparably damaging these systems, we are directly relating to our ability to gather supplies such as food sources and lumber and agriculture in the future. Thus it falls upon humanity to act accordingly to try and prevent the damage we will cause if we continue “business as usual” in the…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    From Eighteenth century until toward the final decade of the century, people did not accept the idea that the species could be “utterly extinguished”(42). Deism was certainly the philosophy they believed to explain the extinction; They believed that God “immediately interposed his will in nature”(42) and “supernaturally intervened in mundane affairs”(42). However the first chapter, How the World became Natural, describes that the sense of divine intervention in Nature was being lost and instead the gradual and incessant action of natural forces were recognized in producing geological change. Likewise, catastrophism “persuaded man to accept both death and progressive change in the universe”(44). Instead of the conception that all the “major structural plans existed in the mind of God”(46), people started to observe the patterns of life, “the divine blueprints, persisted from one age to another”(48). “Life was a historic progression in which the past died totally”(49). Sir Charles Lyell says that the reason why it is inevitable for some species to suffer a reduction in numbers and to be replaced by others, and thus the life is a long course of geological change by natural forces is that “every living creature competed for living space and that every change of season, every shift of shore line, gave advantages to some forms of life and…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In an NBC news article, the author stated, “Scientists are one step closer to bringing a woolly mammoth back to life” (Ghose). Her statement proves that animal cloning is not a dream or idea anymore. It is now a reality and scientist from all around the world are utilizing animal cloning. Cloning in general has evolved its technology over the years and has become more advanced. In fact, author Jacqueline Langwith wrote an article on animal cloning, which started, “Animal cloning has entered the world of horse racing and other equestrian sports.” (Langwith). Many people are excited to clone their favorite or most successful horse. An example that Jacqueline cited was, “An Italian Haflinger foal named Prometea was the first cloned horse” (Langwith). However, cloning is a new type of science that is…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The purpose of this piece formal writing is to inform the scientists that are coming very close to making this happen, about how de-extinction can be good and bad for the future world. This piece of writing should be sent to scientists that are going to do this and it should also be put on science websites that have other pieces of writing like this.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Cloning

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For many years, scientists have been experimenting in the field of cloning. Cloning uses an egg cell and a somatic cell to make a duplicate copy of the organism. It is currently a highly controversial topic in the scientific world. Many people can benefit from cloning. From farmers to patients, not only does cloning help scientists discover more about genetics, it will also help a lot of people. However, there are also ethical issues with cloning, such as the use of embryonic stem cells and cross-species hybrids. For instance, at the Salk institute, a human-pig embryo was recently made and destroyed. The purpose of the experiment was to see if human organs could be grown inside a pig. The authors believe that we are still far off from accomplishing cloning of human organs in animals. I believe that cloning will help this world, but there needs to be restrictions on human cloning and cross-breeding.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Science Gone Wrong

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have scientific technology and developments gone too far? For a question like this, everyone would have a different opinion. New scientific achievements have been a great step forward for mankind. However, even though everyone is excited about cloning humans and being able to teleport, there would still be a risk that it may all go too far; all of these experiments can turn from a good idea for helping people into something that could change the world into a bad place if the technology got into the wrong hands. One of the main scientific breakthroughs over the last few years has been the ability to clone animals. Genetically-modified foods have made a big impact in the news lately. New scientific technologies like robots are starting to take over jobs that humans are capable of doing. Science can go too far because some experiments are morally wrong and go beyond many beliefs. So what is science’s next step, to replace the thinkers of the world?…

    • 936 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ecological restoration is the improvement of an ecosystem, restoring it back to its original state. It is the essential part of human relationship with nature. Restoration is the main point to bring back what was lost in nature, and as Light said, it was more than just that in ecological restoration and it could be seen as a helpful way of reforming a relationship to nature (Rose, 2016). Value, the culture of nature is human relation with the natural world, in other words, restoration. Throughout this paper, I will be discussing the key arguments against ecological restoration in relation to other philosophers, Light’s main arguments in support of ecological restoration and restoring environment philosophy.…

    • 114 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning notes

    • 764 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Aside from the pros of cloning, there are still risks. We only hear of the success of cloning, what about the many, many experiments that failed? Animals can teach us about the risks of cloning.…

    • 764 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays