Preview

Appeal and Appellate Court Decision

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
974 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Appeal and Appellate Court Decision
Capstone Case Briefs

U. S. v. Thomas
Citation: United States v. Thomas, 34 F.3d 44 (2nd Cir. 1994)
Summary of Facts: Wallie Howard was a Syracuse police officer who was shot and killed during a cocaine bust. Luther Gregory was Wallie Howard’s confidential informant. Davidson was the head supplier of the cocaine conspiracy. Parke was the chief lieutenant of Wallie Howard also the deliveryman for Davidson. Parke and Morales (Davidson’s deliverymen) frequently delivered cocaine to customers. Lawrence was a cocaine seller in one of the conspiracy drug apartments and was the muscles in the operation. Stewart had dealt cocaine in the past and he owed the group some money and needed to pay off his debt.
Case History: On October 18th and 22nd of the year 1990, a Syracuse police officer was working undercover for the DEA and confidential informant Luther Gregory made purchases of cocaine from Morales. While the transaction was going down, Parke was outside the facility conducting surveillance. On October 30, 1990, Wallie Howard (the Syracuse police officer) was shot and killed during a cocaine “buy-bust.” Morales, Stewart, and Lawrence are tried and found guilty in a court of law. They attempted to appeal the conviction based on the defense of self-defense. They were denied but still able to be acquitted.
Legal Issue(s) on appeal:
The legal issue in question (on appeal) is whether the defendants can claim the self-defense defense. The defendants wish to claim this defense because Agent Wallie Howard had opened fire on them during the third cocaine “buy-bust” deal.
Appellate Court Decision: The Appellate Court’s decision was that the defendant(s) were not entitled to use the self-defense defense.
Appellate Court’s Decision Rationale: The reason that Appellate Court made this decision on this case is because the defendant(s) were the first aggressors in the situation. Even though Officer Howard drew and fired his weapon first, the



References:

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    FACTS: Plaintiff sues DC Shooting range, where he is a regular, for its failure to prevent X, a high-ranking member of the gun-owner’s association affiliated with DC Shooting, from entering the range with a gun despite under the influence of alcohol, causing him to carelessly handle his weapon and accidentally shooting Plaintiff’s arm. Plaintiff built his prima facie case by alleging that on the day of the incident, defendant’s reception staff did not prevent X’s entry into the range. Plaintiff also presented witnesses who testified that prior to the shooting, X was stumbling out of the men’s restroom flushed and struggling to keep on his feet. Defendant countered by presenting…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Bridgeport, Connecticut around 2:15 a.m in the morning, Sergeant Connolly received a tip from an informant that a suspect who was sitting in a vehicle early in the morning at a high crime area carrying narcotics and a gun at his waist. After calling for backup, Sergeant Connolly approached to the vehicle and tapped on the widow and asked Robert Williams (the suspect) to open the door. Instead of opening the door, Robert Williams rolled down the window. At this time, Sergeant Connolly reached in and removed a fully loaded gun from the Robert Williams’s waist. Also, the gun was not visible from outside the car, but it exactly where the informant said it was. After arresting Robert Williams for illegal possession of a handgun, heroin and a…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Minnesota vs. Timothy Dickerson, two police officers parked in an unmarked car, outside of an apartment building known for trafficking contraband substances, did willfully and knowingly stop and frisk respondent due to suspicious and evasive behavior, exiting the twelve-unit apartment building. The officers felt that upon his exit and approach towards patrol car, and eye contact with one of the officers, he turned and proceeded into a side alley. Officers then pursued respondent feeling his suspicious and evasive behavior was probable of being criminal in nature. They pulled their car into the alley and immediately stopped and searched the defendants outer clothing finding no weapons. During the cursory search one officer testified that he had felt a cellophane bag containing crack cocaine later when weighed a total of 1/5th of a gram was found. The officers claimed it within their scope to search and seize what the officer suspected to be drugs inside the defendants clothing.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McHugh J put forward that the fatal wound could not be determined as to whether it was caused in the first instance or the second instance, and that the wording used by O’Bryan J was reflective of whether or not the jury found the Appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first or second instances and that if that the jury had in fact found that the appellant had inflicted the fatal blow in the first instance that provocation could not be a defence in the second instance.…

    • 1100 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Decision: The Court of Appeals took action and reversed the conviction on the basis that the commerce power of the Congress did not reach out as far as to make that conviction. The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Appeals which stated that Congress’s Commerce power was limited and could not regulate the carrying of firearms or to categorize it as commerce, and that there was no evidence that…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Case Brief

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The issue in this case is to determine whether the defendant 's action in this case constitute a "substantial step" toward the commission of second degree murder under the new statue. The "substantial step" issue has not yet been…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of State v. Rounds, the defense challenges the conduct of Officer Oliver Towns and the evidence his conduct yielded. The defense wages their action on three major cases, all of which apply, but none in the way cited: Riley V. California, 573 U.S. ____ (2014), Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, (1963) and Carroll v United States, 267 U.S. 132 (1925).…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Farmer V Pilot

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    From the Pilot’s perspective, the potential applicable defense privileges that the courts provide to the Defense such that they are not held responsible for their act, are in the form of i) consent, ii) self defense, iii) defense of others (good samaritan) or iv) necessity. Though there are additional defense privileges available under the rule of law, the facts of this case lean towards exploring the said defenses.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    LAPD Rampart Scandal

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Rampart Scandal is about a widespread corruption in the community resources against street hoodlums or better known as “CRASH” anti-gain unit of the LAPD Rampart division in the late 1990's. More than 70 police officers in the CRASH unit were implicated in misconduct, making it one of the worst cases of documented police misconduct in US history. The convicted offenses include unprovoked shootings, unprovoked beatings, planting of evidence, framing of suspects, steeling and dealing narcotics, bank robbery, perjury, and covering up evidence of these activities.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Terry Stop Case Study

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Though the trial court rejected the prosecution theory that the guns had been seized during a search incident to a lawful arrest, the court denied the motion to suppress and admitted the weapons into evidence on the ground that the officer had cause to believe that Terry and Chilton were acting suspiciously, that their interrogation was warranted, and that the officer, for his own protection, had the right to pat down their outer clothing having reasonable cause to believe that they might be armed. The court distinguished between an investigatory "stop" and an arrest, and between a "frisk" of the outer clothing for weapons and a full-blown search for evidence of crime. Terry and Chilton were found guilty, an intermediate appellate court affirmed, and the State Supreme Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that "no substantial constitutional question" was…

    • 2397 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neither the dash cam nor the police reports showed that Ferrell was calling for help when he saw the police officers and since he was running towards them the officers had the right to defend themselves. Officer Kerrick should not of pulled out his firearm and the fact that he thought that Ferrell was trying to get his gun away from him still did not warrant the officer to shoot Ferrell. Especially since the other two officers testified that they never saw reason to pull out their own guns. In the best case scenario, Kerrick should of brought out his own stun gun and used that to shoot Ferrell instead. Also I feel like the women who called 911 was wrong as well. She called the police in fear of a strange man, who she thought was trying to break down her door, but she never bothered to listen to Ferrell as he was probably calling out for help repeatedly. Whether or not the police departments actions were correct or not is up to speculation. In my mind the actions of the police department handling the case and the officer who used their stun gun was correct, but the actions of Randall Kerrick was completely wrong.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stand Your Ground Law

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    United States overturned the manslaughter charge on Mr. Babe Beard, after Mr. Beard had shot and killed Will Jones after a disagreement with Will and his two brothers on Mr. Beard's property. Before the shooting there has been threats from the Jones brothers on Mr. Beard, soon after the threats Jones walked onto Beard’s property with an angry manner with a concealed knife in his hand. Beard had warned Jones to stop coming closer and further onto his property but Jones had ignored him, thus led to Beard protecting himself by shooting Jones. In 1921 a well provided case on self-defense was introduced. In Brown v. United States a man was found guilty for a murder on his co-worker. The defendant was standing at a desk working as the co-worker approached him slowing holding a knife in their hand. The defendant had retreated to his desk for safety as the co-worker was still in pursuit. Knowing he had kept a gun in his desk for reasons other than something like this., the defendant grabbed his gun and in self-defense shot the attacker. The Supreme Court stated that the defendant did not have a safe place to retreat to. This is what the “Stand Your Ground” law is based off…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Appeals Process

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What is an appeal? An appeal is a “proceeding in which a case is brought before a higher court for a review of a lower court’s judgment” (pg. 465). This basically means a process which takes place because the defendant and their attorney feel that the verdict that was given was inaccurate which was due to something that may have happened during trial or the arrest. Appeals are done to make sure that the person has had a fair trial and none of their rights were violated. An appellate court as the text states can help an area decided on how to address certain issues. This is good because the appellate court judges can make a decision without having to worry about what society will think and if they will get reelected. An appellate court goes through cases and tries to understand what has taken place during the arrest and see if the law was upheld. An appeals process starts right after the trial, the defense must submit an appeal to the court. The person appealing should file all documents with the appellate court. The will then file briefs and the court will later hear each sides argument and decide/ once the decision is made the courts will announce their findings and why. An appellate court is based on the law not on any facts so a defense attorney cannot argue the facts presented during the case or that you were found guilty and you believe you are innocent. Your appeal should consist of the fairness for example if you had the right to a speedy trial or a defense attorney etc.…

    • 699 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and renowned essayist is a libertarian who is commended by other officials for his “common sense” decisions. Giving the dissent in this case, the Chief Justice waged that there was no constitutional violation and the Ninth Circuit Court did not agree with the allegation of excessive force, therefore reversing the finding of the lower district court to reflect in favor of the officers who were granted qualified immunity. In the Chief Justice’s opinion and despite her condition, Ms. Brooks was given ample warnings and time to get out of the vehicle on her own accord. However Ms. Brooks refused to cooperate with the extremities of this traffic stop. She displayed nothing but defiance and disrespect towards the state law and the law enforcement. According to Chief Justice Kozinski, the officers could have chosen any number of forceful restraints such as physical choke holds, dangerous gases, pepper sprays or even police dogs, when it came to getting her out of the vehicle and bringing the situation under control. Chief Justice Kozinski was also concerned with the possibilities of what could have happened by the car keys laying on the floor in front of her, possibly making her a flight risk and a threat to all if she chose to flee the scene. So considering the circumstances from every angle and in lieu of what extremities could have resulted from the other…

    • 2285 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Burden of Proof

    • 3641 Words
    • 15 Pages

    The jury was directed by the judge to acquit the defendant if there was reasonable doubt in their mine and they were directed to convict if they had no doubt if the defendant had killed intentionally. The judge directed the jury correctly but however, the jury was unable to agree on it.…

    • 3641 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays