Preview

Stand Your Ground Law

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
893 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stand Your Ground Law
I believe that all citizens should be allowed the “Stand Your Ground” law for self-defense from harmful threats around the U.S. Crime rates in the U.S. have been rising over the last couple of years. Many people do not know how to protect themselves from a threat. Many are too scared to as they could get in serious trouble if the threat is not posing a threat to them. State legislative bodies have been pushing to expand self-defense laws in the U.S. In recent years this law has only applied to citizens who were defending themselves against threats. Now, Legislators have been discussing the ‘Stand Your Ground’ law and it has now been put into the law books in almost half of the states, and have even been discussed in European nations. …show more content…
United States overturned the manslaughter charge on Mr. Babe Beard, after Mr. Beard had shot and killed Will Jones after a disagreement with Will and his two brothers on Mr. Beard's property. Before the shooting there has been threats from the Jones brothers on Mr. Beard, soon after the threats Jones walked onto Beard’s property with an angry manner with a concealed knife in his hand. Beard had warned Jones to stop coming closer and further onto his property but Jones had ignored him, thus led to Beard protecting himself by shooting Jones. In 1921 a well provided case on self-defense was introduced. In Brown v. United States a man was found guilty for a murder on his co-worker. The defendant was standing at a desk working as the co-worker approached him slowing holding a knife in their hand. The defendant had retreated to his desk for safety as the co-worker was still in pursuit. Knowing he had kept a gun in his desk for reasons other than something like this., the defendant grabbed his gun and in self-defense shot the attacker. The Supreme Court stated that the defendant did not have a safe place to retreat to. This is what the “Stand Your Ground” law is based off

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Unfortunately, the intent of the laws to allow a person to defend themselves has been used to defend the actions of people who are misrepresenting the purpose of the law. The law has been exploited by those invoking “stand your ground” to justify actions from animal abuse and misdemeanor drug possession. It brings into question the intent of the law as being used for self-defense when people invoke it to justify any criminal activity. The way the law is applied becomes a concern with the public when it is perceived that a person can be chased down and killed without repercussions. This is another reason the duty to retreat portion of Ohio’s concealed carry law doesn’t work. When a victim retreats, they can put themselves at more risk to be followed by the attacker and killed while trying to follow the law. The situation becomes problematic when attacker uses the law as a defense. Under the proposed changes, the evidence must support the claim of self-defense and be proven as justified with the majority of the evidence. (Lynch) Another critique of the law is that is racially biased. This perception could be based on the fact that the cases that involve different races tend to make the nightly news. However, the statistics show that there is no difference between the races in being charged or in conviction rates. “White defendants who invoked the law were charged and convicted at the same rate as black defendants.” (Hundley) Another claim is that “Stand your Ground” laws cause an increase in crime. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the national violent crime rate has decreased in 18 of the last 20 years. (Cox) In the states that have passed similar self-defense laws to Florida’s the murder rate dropped drastically between 2005 and 2009 as the laws were being passed throughout the country. Since Florida passed the law in 2005,…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Michael Brown, Darren Wilson the police officer shot and killed Michael Brown, Wilson did not get any charges for that case. Chaney notes” ironic how department of justice found discrimination against blacks but not a charge of murder for darren wilson who killed Michael brown. In the essay Race Matters, it states “ 70% of black people say they get treated different than whites when cops are involved” (10). Even in the Trayvon Martin case, George Zimmerman walked out free. George Zimmerman who fatally shot Martin because he felt threaten of a black teenager walking down the street with his hood up minding his own business. Zimmerman walked free because of the florida law, stand your ground law. The stand your ground law is if you feel threaten you can use force to protect others and yourself. Zimmerman felt threatened, simply because Trayvon Martin was a black male. Zimmerman was the one following Martin and did not listen to police dispatch. Zimmerman shot an innocent child because he felt threaten. If every time i felt threaten by people, especially around police officers, i would be in jail for multiple murder…

    • 1079 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Campbell Assignment 1

    • 895 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In our violent world today, the ability to protect ourselves is an important factor in our lives. Police cannot be everywhere at once and that is the reason almost all state legislatures have incorporated some kind of self-defense statute for their state. The ability to use deadly force for self-defense has saved many innocent lives over the past couple of years, but it has also taken several. This is the reason why there has been such a great controversy about the normal untrained public, which is our society, being able to make calls about using deadly force. Self- defense laws have changed over the years, but none of them have gotten as much attention as the "Stand Your Ground Statute." This law is a very controversial issue because it takes away the, "Duty to Retreat" prior to the use of deadly force for self-defense. This has raised concerns for the public who are not in favor of using deadly force in the first place. While many opponents want to abolish the "Stand Your Ground Statute", I believe that it is an essential law that should be kept in our society in order to protect the innocent people who have no other option than to exterminate the threat he/she, or the family have faced.…

    • 895 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In today’s world there are many disputes about the old and some new changes to the “Stand Your Ground” laws. Some believe that these laws are crazy and that a society like ours should not need them and that if you shot someone outside your home that it is a crime and need to be sentenced to prison some other form of punishment. And then there are those who believe that the changes have brought a better more positive side to the community and that the laws should be engorged.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law and Ground Laws

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The law of “Stand Your Ground” deals with a self-defense law which is for giving the individual rights for making use of deadly force which are for defending themselves without any kind of requirement of evading or retreating from any dangerous situation. Stand Your Ground is a law which places non obligation at all on the potential victims of any crime for retreating and calling the law enforcement personnel.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I Believe that people have a right to self defense. There is no way to entirely stop people that obtain a firearm legally from using it to murder another person. For instance if someone breaks into a stranger's house with a gun they instantly have the upper hand if the homeowner does not also own a gun. But if they possess a gun now there is an equal playing field. Take away Americans rights to own a gun then we take away their right to protect themselves and their families. Some people believe that protection is what we have the police for. If someone breaks into your house…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This self-defense law currently has 22 states that agree with what it stands for. States such as Washington, Montana, Pennsylvania and Kansas are among these that have adopted and inforce this law. Self-defense is critical to our survival in the world today. Many people have to defend themselves on a daily basis, depending on the area in which they live. I think this law is necessary for those who, on a daily basis, are threatened by violence. An example of this law in action is the Whipple vs Edwards case in North Charleston, South Carolina. In this case, Stand Your Ground was used for A’Kara Travil Kymberle Edwards who was “arrested in connection to the fatal stabbing of her boyfriend last summer has been granted immunity from prosecution” (Murder Suspect…). In this case,…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It’s Stand Your Ground. North Carolina used to follow the old Castle Doctrine, where there was a duty to retreat before you used deadly force. If it was reasonable for you to retreat or back away, you were legally required to do that. But in 2011, the General Assembly in North Carolina enacted a 'Stand Your Ground'-type statue where there is no duty to…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The stand your ground law allows a person to use deadly force on another person not just in or on their property, but where ever they may be as long as they have the right to be there. In this law you don’t have no duty to retreat or ask question. They have the right to stand their ground by deadly force it they feel it is necessary. If the person is not engaged in unlawful activities, and if the person is attacked they have the right to use deadly force. I ideal is to protect yourself at all any cost.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Because of this right, self-defense is an acceptable affirmative defense. In order for self-defense to be accepted, the defendant must prove that their life was in danger at the time of the crime. If the immediate threat ceases then the act of self-defense must also cease. For example if John is attacked by an intruder and has no other choice but to kill said intruder, the self-defense is valid. However, if that intruder sees John with a gun and runs out the window but John run after, shoots, and kills him the self-defense is no longer valid.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law-abiding citizens deserve the right to protect their families in their own homes, especially if the police are judged incapable of dealing with the threat of attack. Would-be rapists and armed burglars will think twice before attempting to break into any house where the owners may keep firearms for self-defence.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1791, when the 2nd amendment was written, there was an organization called the watch. It was “made up of six watchmen, one constable, and several volunteers who patrolled at night, walking the rounds” (national law enforcement museum). Their job was to investigate and punish the criminals. The modern police’s job is to prevent and investigate the crime, and to punish the criminals. Police prevent the crimes before it even happens. Some people might ask how do they prevent crime, answer lie in a person’s phone. In 21st century most of the people who are at a crime scene will rather call the police than trying to stop it themselves. This show how much people depend on law enforcement rather than getting involved themselves. If citizen are not going to use a gun in situations like this, then they should not keep…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is a Person’s Right to Defend Himself More Important than a Person’s Right to Privacy?…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    self defense

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. My first contention is that stand your ground law says that a person can use self-defense when there is a reasonable threat, without an option to retreat. What we must look at here is that reasonable is not clearly defined. Some people might think that a person with a plastic knife is reasonable. According to Thomas Hobbes, states are always right. How this applies to this is that the government will be able to define the word reasonable. So I believe that if a person should not be able to decide if it is reasonable enough.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    laws of self defence

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The strong debate on what you would call reasonable force to defend yourself with when you are being attacked and whether the law should be changed. Should you be allowed to kill someone if they are trying to kill you? Or should you do nothing and let the attacker get away?…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays