Preview

Andrew Carnegie Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
495 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Carnegie Essay
Michael Murray
22 May 2014
The Gospel of Wealth: Andrew Carnegie Andrew Carnegie was an extremely successful businessman through the wealth he obtained with the railroad industry, but as a person felt that this fortune was better spent on socially beneficial projects, and his idea became known as “ The Gospel of Wealth." Carnegie's main concern was how the wealth was administered throughout the country, responding with the notion that the rich and poor should bind together and benefit as one. He noted that not only had the conditions of their lives changed, but also had actually revolutionized, creating a vast contrast between the social classes. However, he stated that this change could be beneficial for the human race as a whole. 

 The wealthy businessman believed that wealth should be shared among people and could be most readily shared through families leaving their money to their descendants, spent on public projects, or simply administered during the lives of the wealthy themselves. He felt that the rich had only made their money because of other people, and in the end should reimburse them and the public rather than squandering away their fortune. By using this method, in the end the wealth or property of one would become the wealth of many, and the sharing of this money would better society and perhaps civilization. The central thesis of the essay focused on the dangers of wealthy entrepreneurs simply passing on their fortune to their children, or other persons and organizations that were not qualified to handle it. Instead of wasting money on frivolous expenses and using it inefficiently, Carnegie argued that such money should be put towards the public good. Thus, even as capitalism could indeed hurt some while benefiting others, poverty could in fact be tackled and solved by the very wealthy businessmen that had contributed to the problem. The Gospel of Wealth was not an attack by Andrew Carnegie on the laissez-faire system of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carnegie argued against wasting of useful resources and capital in different forms of irresponsibility spending, extravagance other than promotion of the administration of said money. The case of building public institutions wills results to the improvement of the general conditions of the people in general. It is over the course of a particular person’s lifetime and also in connection with the cost of reducing the stratification that is between the poor and the rich.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 1302

    • 3994 Words
    • 16 Pages

    bigger, stronger, faster machines, fuel lamps (meaning people could work at night and make more money)…

    • 3994 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Carnegie has inspired women and men to use their funds to their communities. Although he advised other wealthy to use their money to benefit the communities and help in the preservation of the political system and America economy. I believe Mr. Carnegie’s argument is persuasive and is still relevant today. The wealthy, as well as small business owners, are the job creators in our society today. Their vision and leadership help to support the lower class in earning a decent living while allowing them to realize their own potential. The lower class today has more opportunities that were not available to them generations ago. While government is there to provide a safety net for those less fortunate, it is the wealthy and job creators that…

    • 128 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gospel of Wealth: Carnegie’s philosophy that the millionaire had a duty to distribute wealth while still alive.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was a proponent of shifting the economy from one of private capital to one of publicly-owned capital where the members of society would work in mutual cooperation with one another. Although there are problems with his system such as free-riding and lack of incentive to work optimally, he hoped that the morals of society would be able to evolve to a point where fulfilling one’s honor and duty to society would be enough of a motivation to maximize productivity. Unfortunately, this situation is still too idealistic for even contemporary times, as the top 5% of wealth holders possess more than half of the country’s wealth even today. There are individuals such as Bill Gates and Donald Trump that have been able to accumulate wealth by means of using innovative technologies and entrepreneurial abilities. The average standard of living has certainly increased, but it falls well short of Bellamy’s hopes of having a mutually cooperative and fully educated…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If I was poor at the time of the Industrialization and had to work long hours for a little amount of money, I would take Carnegie as an unethical man. However, times have changed, and it would be wrong to say that his point of view was unethical. Andrew was a clever man. The fact that he was a self-taught man, poor and immigrant makes his views credible because he has been on both sides. Just like the coal miner aspires for being better in his job, Carnegie once did the same. Ethically speaking, Carnegie, as far as history has provided for us, never did something that would harm others. First, his view on the survival of the fittest is not unethical, is just his point of view, and at a certain point, it is true. Only the smartest ones survive or persevere. If everyone had the best traits for survival, then there would be no competition. Additionally, the idea that the poor now enjoy what the rich never had at a time is not unethical. It promotes the idea of comfort yourself with what you have because at a time those things were not within anyone’s reach. However, now these luxuries are available, and the people should aspire to have more. Another point to restate is to help those who help themselves, this is also ethical. He talks about a social responsibility to improve society which is no way a harm to anyone. To sum up, Carnegie’s views can be considered…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rags to Riches may seem like a myth because only a very few people can say that they rose from the bottom to the top. During the Industrial Revolution, America became an urban and industrial world. The world was ran majority by machinery, factories, and mass production and less agriculture. Unfortunately, industrialization often caused the poor working class to have a rough employment and living conditions, but the higher, richer class benefitted with improved living conditions. Irregularity was happening within the social lives, the employment, and the finances of the people. Andrew Carnegie Wealth and Its Uses 1907 provides a more accurate view of industrialization and its effects because the world during the Industrial Revolution could not…

    • 368 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, if you have died rich, you have done nothing but hoard your wealth and chances are that most of society would not think kindly of you, therefore being disgraced. On the other hand, if you “spread the wealth” by building a public institution, that could better the community as a whole. In addition to helping the community, you would know that your wealth would have a lasting contribution to the betterment of society and you would gain a positive image in the eyes of others. Having a system like this wouldn’t be depriving the wealthy from their rights, however, since “The laws of accumulation will be left free, the laws of distribution free” (Foner 30), according to Carnegie. That means that the wealthy could gain as much money as they can and could spend it however they wish, but there would be pressure on them to do what is morally right. Think about it—how can we expect to advance as a society by allowing the wealthy to “hoard” their wealth? If a group of people have possession of a vast majority of the wealth available and choose to keep it, nothing would change or get any better for those not a part of that top percentage. In order to survive as a society, there has to be a constant flow of wealth between citizens and the community. If not, the problem of wealth and poverty would only…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout history competition has created bitter tension between social classes. Competition has occurred in every social structure that has existed to this day. Social structure has been the determining factor of competition: in essence the poorer classes have always tried to compete with the wealthier classes to seize their wealth and power; the greater the economical gap between the two opposing classes the fiercer the competition between them. Two highly esteemed and different people, Karl Marx and Andrew Carnegie, developed their own ideologies to resolve and ease class tension, that is, whether changes should be imposed on the structure and role of social classes. Another writer, Sam Keen illustrates the effect of competition in the extreme. Within their opposing and controversial views, there lies the more efficient social-economic resolution: a modified version of Carnegie's argument, despite the fact that it has some imperfections. The answer is determined by the acknowledgment by the powerful and the wealthy of certain responsibilities to the poorer classes. Each author feels that the competition within a capitalist society has definite effects on social structure but disagree as to what this effect is.…

    • 1802 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Essay 1 45

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages

    It also extends to the ends his strategies and schemes for dealing with the social problems he identified by redistributing wealth. He didn't like the rich, and he expanded the freeway system.. redistributing wealth…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prosperous people should try and interpret the views of the less fortunate and make an effort to help them, maybe not on a personal basis, but instead for the general public. Should the wealthy people’s morals include helping the poor? Andrew Carnegie wrote the essay “The Gospel of Wealth.” The introduction announces Carnegie’s main idea, “His proposal is that such men should give their wealth back to the community for its benefit in the form of institutions that would contribute to “the improvement of the race,” (p. 342). Many people agree with Carnegie’s idea.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Economic Justice, what is economic justice, and is it truly just? MacKinnon opens this chapter with a conversation between two people who have different views on the subject. One believes that wealthy citizens have a right to keep the wealth that they obtain; while the other believes that it is the responsibility of the wealthy to share their good fortune. This conversation raises the questions; what does society owe its citizens, and what do citizens owe society.…

    • 1879 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Class in America

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    He provided specific percentages in the middle rage of the economic spectrum. Also, he said the gap between rich and poor and between rich and the middle class is larger than it has ever been. Different class affects more than life-style and material well-being. Class standing has a significant impact on our chances for survival.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    (The Nature of Wealth: From Literature to Reality) If we took a closer look, the differences…

    • 5763 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    wawasan 2020

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Such was the noble vision back then, but what is the reality today, given the volatile global occurrences in this new millennium? Unbridled global capitalism has brought about economic crisis, and policies meant to boost people’s quality of life have inadvertently widened the gap between rich and poor.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays