Preview

Edward Bellamy Looking Backward Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
782 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Edward Bellamy Looking Backward Summary
Dissatisfied with the socioeconomic conditions of the nineteenth century, Edward Bellamy wrote Looking Backward to address the flaws and offer solutions for a better society. The author lived during the peak of the Industrial Revolution, which increased the efficiency of the economy, but also widened the gap between social classes. Innovative machinery was able to produce more output per capita and also raise the average standard of living, but the majority of the wealth was possessed by a direct minority of the population. Bellamy, observing the social injustices of having an aristocratic class believing that they were superior to the masses, blamed this result on the infrastructure of urbanization, industrialization, and capitalism. Using …show more content…
In an industrialized economy, private capital gain and the weeding out of inefficient industries characterized the infrastructure of the society. Dr. Leete says, “Their misery came, with all your other miseries, from that incapacity for cooperation which followed from the individualism on which your social system was founded, and from your inability to perceive that you could make times more profit out of your fellow men by uniting with them…” (page 58) By emphasizing the role of competition upon the economy, the more efficient industries and employees survived while inefficient productions facilities were extinguished and less skilled workers were forced to suffer from unemployment. However, Bellamy saw this occurrence as being a waste to society, as many resources were being pulled toward industries that were eventually eliminated and there was a supply of human labor that was not being utilized optimally. The author’s main concern was that the machinery of the industrial economy was an easy means of accumulating wealth for only a select few of the population and that the resources were not being efficiently distributed to the entire population. For that reason, he wrote Looking Backward to have these issues be recognized through radical ideas by those that were causing …show more content…
He was a proponent of shifting the economy from one of private capital to one of publicly-owned capital where the members of society would work in mutual cooperation with one another. Although there are problems with his system such as free-riding and lack of incentive to work optimally, he hoped that the morals of society would be able to evolve to a point where fulfilling one’s honor and duty to society would be enough of a motivation to maximize productivity. Unfortunately, this situation is still too idealistic for even contemporary times, as the top 5% of wealth holders possess more than half of the country’s wealth even today. There are individuals such as Bill Gates and Donald Trump that have been able to accumulate wealth by means of using innovative technologies and entrepreneurial abilities. The average standard of living has certainly increased, but it falls well short of Bellamy’s hopes of having a mutually cooperative and fully educated

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In the late 19th century, the wealth was not well spread around the country. The poor were extremely poor, and the rich were extremely rich. Three men in particular held a large portion of the wealth, and many had different ideas on what to do with all that money. There was a wide range of viewpoints towards wealth in the late 19th century, and the viewpoints between Andrew Carnegie, Edward Bellamy, and John D. Rockefeller had substantial comparisons and contrasts that are crucial to our knowledge of today’s wealth in the economy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Post Civil War

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prosperous businessmen had immense influence and control over the post-Civil War economy and business in the United States. Even though large corporations led to the decrease in food, fuel, and lighting prices as illustrated in Document A, there were many small businesses and laborers who were left without jobs due to the dishonesty and domination from these large business owners. Document C describes how the manufacturing system has taken away the individualism and uniqueness of the workers craftsmanship. The worker is stuck doing one particular task until it is exhausted and that is the only trade skill they are left with. The system offers the hard worker no freedom or opportunity for advancement keeping them stagnant and stuck in the same place. The new manufacturing system brought about homogeneity and essentially destroyed uniqueness. For example, Henry Ford, the automobile tycoon, used the assembly line technique effectively in order to produce more cars at a cheaper price, which made them more cost effective. But in retrospect, the assembly line destroyed the pride men took in their work. The hours were growing longer, and the workers were bored and worn out. The people resented the long hard hours for little pay. This is what brought about the formation of labor unions. The workers way of fighting back and trying to change the rights of the people was the creation of a new political party and labor unions.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In order to discuss the key impact that the Industrial Revolution of the 18th and 19th century that began in the United Kingdom and spread throughout western Europe; I believe that we must first realize that through the history of human existence we seem to somehow fix what we break, innovation as the result of chaos…creation for destruction; and I believe that history shows that humans occasionally takes huge leaps in logical evolution of reasoning and intelligence whether it is nature’s course or self-imposed by an invading circumstance of need. And it is under this premise that I believe that the Industrial Revolution was an inevitable occurrence that was ignited by the overpopulation; just as the inevitable revolution of technology changes that had occurred in Rome at the beginning of the Roman Empire Era in 49 BC which was also because of over population. Advancements in technology were needed in order to meet the demands of the population.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Smith's theory coincided with a long-developing American tradition of individualism and opposition to government interference. America, not Britain, would be the great testing ground of Adam Smith's ideas (Miller and Masur). The industrial revolution was characterized by a technological revolution and a commercial revolution fueled by economic individualism and unrestricted competition. The lower class was transitioning from farm lands to a more secure job in a factory. Despite the terrifying wages and labor conditions, America would gradually improve. Adam Smith in “Theory of Moral Sentiments,” argues humans are social creatures and that poverty causes unfavorable regard. This industrial boom allowed the poverty-stricken to find a job and reestablish that love/belonging stage in their life. It could be argued this led to the beginning of the creation of the middle class, reshaping the haves and have-nots. Private investments and loans enabled inventors and scientists to develop these new technological advancements at expediting rates. Without capital from wealthy investors, many inventions would have not occurred due to insufficient funding, which was required to create their vision. Along with the importance of the creation of these inventions, the jobs that followed producing these goods were just as important, this best exemplifies Smith’s invisible…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All men are created equal – that is, unless you subscribe to Andrew Carnegies ideas put forth in the 1889 essay “The Gospel of Wealth.” Carnegie (2010) wrote that some people are “unworthy” while others are “the highest type of man, the best and most valuable of all that humanity has yet accomplished” (p. 395). Carnegie’s (2010) belief in social Darwinism and “survival of the fittest” (p. 393) seemed to convince him that because he had achieved wealth, he was the most fit or qualified to determine the best distribution for it. However, Carnegie’s ideas on wealth distribution do not address many societal problems, especially poverty. Poverty was better addressed by John Galbraith (2010), Harvard economics professor and John F. Kennedy advisor, who had differing views on wealth distribution (pp. 405-415). Because Galbraith had a more compassionate view toward all people, he would likely criticize Carnegie’s ideas on distribution of wealth and modify Carnegie’s investments in the public sector. Galbraith’s overall view was also more true to the gospel than Carnegie’s views as expressed in “The Gospel of Wealth.”…

    • 1928 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robert Owen was a successful Welsh businessman during the Industrial Revolution in Britain, but he left his mark on history as one of the leading social reformers of his time. He observed the changes in economic and social life caused by the rapid growth of machinery as he worked in the textile industry. He challenged the social view and believed that poverty was the consequence of the sins of the working class. He thought that in order to improve the man, you need to improve his social environment first, and set 8 statements of what he called the “true principles” based on them. The proving ground for Owen’s social theories was New Lanark Mills in Scotland, the management in which Owen commenced in 1800. At there, he restricted the labor of…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie, born in Scotland, came to the United States in 1848. Here he started with nothing and turned himself into a self-made man. He was in fact, one of the richest men if this era. In 1889 he wrote “The Gospel of Wealth”. In this essay he discusses philanthropy and explains that with money also comes responsibility. He stated that obedience [to the Gospel of Wealth] will one day solve the problem of the rich and poor, and will bring “Peace on earth, among men good will.” I agree with this statement because the “Gospel of Wealth” claims that everyone is free to make as much money as they can, however, they should not leave it to their heirs and should use it to help mankind.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The railroads were a large reason for economic change. Before them, foods and goods were generally sold on a local market (Lecture, January 13). With railroads, products could more easily be moved around the United States, or even shipped overseas. This was a problem for many of the skilled workers who used to determine how much of a good they wanted to produce and how much they wanted to sell that good for; they were now opened up to competition. Also, they were replaced by unskilled laborers who worked in factories. This change made the skilled artisans equal to the unskilled workers, and they could not compete with the output of the factories. They were therefore put out of jobs and were forced to work elsewhere, such as one skilled iron molder who could not even afford to pay his rent and would not be paid for at least a month even if he took another job (Interpretations, 55).…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Carnegie was a firm believer in idea of individualism. That everyman must work and rise on his own ambition alone, that each man for themselves. In other word, he did not believe in the communist thought of working for the wealth of your brotherhood. Carnegie describes it as evolution of the human class. That it is beyond human control to determine the distribution of wealth. It is good for a nation to have, one end the wealthy, while on the other side, the poor. In this, our nation has grown to know a higher grade of living than what our forefathers experienced. Carnegie goes on to say,…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Industrial Revolution Dbq

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the late 1700’s, the Industrial Revolution began in England creating both positive and negative effects on both the economic and social life of the people in England. The results of these effects have been taken in by numerous perspectives such as people who worked in factories, the factory owners themselves, the government and others who have witnessed the conditions in the cities at the time of the Industrial Revolution.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The end of the War of 1812 brought an end to conflict in America and opened the door for change in the country. Citizens took full advantage of new technology and advances in manufacturing, communication and transportation which made it more profitable to produce agricultural and manufactured goods that could be sold and transported to markets that were previously out of reach. This boosted the economy beyond what had previously been seen in America and profoundly changed the lives of its citizens. Referred to by historians as the “Market Revolution” it injected capitalism into the lives of Americans. Manufacturers replaced skilled workers in favor of the newest machine and farmers turned to commercial agriculture for great profit. However, capitalism did not benefit all. The smaller subsistence farmers who couldn’t compete with the commercial farmers suddenly risked the loss of their farms. Many men found themselves working menial labor jobs that promised no future. While some were getting rich, others were sinking lower. “As a result, competing pulls of relative…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Engels vs. Crystal Palace

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    And so it seems as though those who saw the industrial revolution in a bright and shiny light believed that the lives of the poor could only get better and perhaps even reach equality with the rich through continued innovation. “The poor are not so rude, the rich not so arrogant as they were. The Exhibition will mingle them still more; dwellings of a common, but improved kind, will tend to the same end, and all will be raised and equalized” (Editorial on Crystal Palace).…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Industrial Revolution greatly affected our society in both good and bad ways. It was a movement where machines changed many people’s way of life as well as the methods in which we manufactured it. In the beginning of this boom of productivity, there were many ways where the negative effects far outweighed the positive.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Smith worries that machines will not keep capitalism in tact, unlike Karl Marx, who wants to abolish capitalism. Marx believes that a capitalist approach to industrialization was effectively a form of exploitation, with factory owners taking advantage of the working class for their own gains. Effectively, society’s increase in consumerism leads to a higher demand of goods, ultimately causing an increase in slave labour. Marx theorized that this ever-increasing demand of products would enable holders of capital to attain greater wealth, due to a more productive economic system, at the expense of the poor. In contrast to Smith, who thought that a division of labour would provide equality and efficiency in the workplace, Marx believed the capitalist system was a barrier to this idea. Marx wrote that the obligation of capital holders to meet product demand would cause them to disregard proper working conditions. He thought the terrible working conditions of the poor, would bring division and inequality into the workplace, causing the poor to eventually overthrow the capitalist society. Whereas, Smith thought that the division of labour under capitalist influence would bring order and equality to the workplace, having a basic social structure. In addition, Marx predicted that wealth would be held in factories and manufacturers, giving the poor who…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Advocates of industrial policy in an attempt to be afforded special privileges let their desires lead them to accept a belief by constructing an apparently rational set of reasons for supposing that belief to be true. The reasons are mere rationalizations of notions held on irrational grounds. At the very least we must constantly pay attention to arguments ignoring that what is true of one or more parts of a whole, taken separately or distributive, is not necessarily true of the whole; and conversely, what is true of the whole is not necessarily true of the parts taken separately. The fallacy arising from neglect of such rules is well illustrated in this passage, “Modern technology is able to create continually greater wealth with the employment…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays