Preview

Analyzing Louis XIV's reign

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
750 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Louis XIV's reign
Louis XIV was the epitome of an absolute monarch. Through his endless wars, extreme extravagance, and absolute control over taxes and the economy, he set the example for other European powers. His absolute rule brought about both positives and negatives. By building a large army to defend and expand his borders, he alienated other empires and created enemies. Placing political power and faith in the nobility helped him rule a vast kingdom but displaced him from the common man. His obsession with being a great conqueror expanded France to its largest in history, but nearly bankrupted the country and resulted in losing more territory than he gained. Although Louis XIV brought many improvements to France, as well as western society, his insatiable lust for war and extravagance caused more harm than good to the French Empire. Louis XIV believed that being a conqueror was the greatest title a leader could obtain. Because of this, he would use his empire's extreme wealth to wage constant wars with his neighbors. During his reign, he created a professional army with standardized weapons and uniforms. He also created a rational system of training and promotion. His army model was copied throughout Europe. Realizing that he wanted to fight on multiple fronts, he greatly increased the size of his army. This, in turn, caused other European powers to expand their armies, as well as form coalitions against the Sun King. This coalition allied against Louis resulted in multiple defeats and loss of land. At first, Louis' wars were quite beneficial. He was able to take over a few cities and began expanding his kingdom to what he considered its natural boundaries. More importantly, he was able to accomplish this without adding taxes to the people. But by 1684, the expansion ceased and the troubles began. He yielded territory to England, Spain, and Sweden. The wars of the next two decades did not provide any additional territories to France and strained the French resources. The

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    An absolute monarch has both positive and negative affects as a system or government. One positive attribute is organization. In document eight, Louis the 14th describes the necessity of organization when ruling a country. Without organization, a kingdom is vulnerable and its fall is imamate. With one absolute ruler, nothing is discussed nor fought over. As Louis 14th described, “The interest of the state…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Is Louis Xiv Effective

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He lost four wages, on four wars. Because of that, France went into bankruptcy. France was at war for 30 years under the rule of Louis XIV. Louis XIV toughest war was the Spanish succession. His grandson inherited Spain, along with all of its possessions. He wanted to unite with him, which would give him other countries, islands and colonies to own. One of the main reasons why Louis XIV lost the wars he did was because of the balance of power. He was much more powerful than the countries he was about to go to war with, smartly, the European countries allied up with each other; balancing out the power between them and France. With the European powers allying to prevent Louis from uniting Spain and France together, they overpowered France. Louis agreed to the Peace of Utrecht; Spain and France crowns could never unite, giving the allied Europeans what they wanted. If Louis had won, he would have control of Spain’s Territories; of other small countries and American colonies. Putting in a great amount of money and losing the wars was not something Louis had intended, because of this, France was greatly in…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although he developed the strongest standing army in Europe, France antagonized all other strong forces in Europe during more than fifty years of his ruling, and eventually bankrupted the French Government. “It produced poverty, misery, and depopulation….Recurring famines and tax increases provoked peasant uprisings” (Palmer 189). From the War of Devolution until the Treaty of Utrecht, Louis gained a slight portion of land in Europe, but he drained the wealth of France and aggravated the burden on French peasants. Endless wars eliminated the chances of creating a prosperous economy system in France and weakened his absolutism with huge debt.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After he took power, Louis XIV made the nobility tax exempt, so the heavy burden of the taxes lied on the peasants, which made their already hard lives even tougher. In document 3, it explains how Louis XIV keeps his courtier in line so that they stay diligent in pleasing him. The documents also depicts his oppressiveness, stating that Louis XIV had many spies that tattled on anyone of any class which ruined the person’s life since the king was a prejudice who did not bother to ask for explanations. Other cruel changes he made during his rule was revoking the Edict of Nantes, which tolerated the Huguenots in France and gave them religious rights. In place of the Edict of Fontainebleau, which allowed the destruction of all Protestant churches and schools throughout France. During the War of the Spanish Succession, Louis XIV prioritized his personal interests above his country’s because he wanted to insure his grandson's, Philip V, right to inherit the Spanish Empire. The war weakened France and situated the country in a huge financial debt, which was blamed on Louis XIV. This shows his views on how to be a proper role of an absolute monarch; apparently, you can do whatever you want since you hold the power and as long as you keep those who have the ability to rebel under control. It also implies that his views are that…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    William Jefferson Clinton was one of the greatest presidents to govern the United States as opposed to the Bush's. Clinton proved to the world our preeminence by way of control, economic growth, and policies ranging from Israel to social security. The Bush's proved to the world that they won the election. Louis XIV and the Stuart Kings also compare in similar ways. Louis XIV was a sound leader whose foresight and character led to the greatness of France, along with delegating authority to great economic and military leaders. The Stuart Kings possessed no foresight or character, many thought of them as stupid and stubborn, and the way they governed their country was reckless. Louis XIV prospered through absolute control, economic growth, and military reform. Where as, the Stuart Kings failure was due to no real control, economic turmoil, and civil war. The most important factor in the success of Louis XIV and the failure of the Stuart Kings was control.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who Is Louis Xiv Selfish

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages

    KING LOUIS XIV Magnificent in bearing and manner, he is every inch a king. Though not tall at 5'7", he carries himself with great majesty. He is susceptible to flattery and believes all that the flatterers say of him. He is at all times a gentleman, just, moderate, and predisposed to kindness towards others. He is a consummate lady's man and has never passed a woman, no matter her rank, without tipping his hat.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV famously declared, “I am the state,” and there is no question that he identified himself as the sole ruler of France. During the so-called Sun King’s absolute monarchy, the nobility had little or no role in or control over the French government. Instead, King Louis built the glamorous palace at Versailles and invited members of the nobility to live on the palace grounds. Most didn’t pay taxes and led an indulgent lifestyle but with no political influence. Most of King Louis’s reign was spent fighting foreign wars that also kept the nobles occupied as soldiers. The French nobility retained their status in high society under King Louis XIV but were never given the powerful political titles that were reserved for men of great intelligence.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rise Of New Monarchs

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Hundred Years War, was the rise of the Valois family in France. France defeated the duchy of Burgundy, and there was no threat of a new state. Louis XI assumed power for the Valois family and contributed to the rise of France as a new monarch. The…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Even with the accomplishments of previous kings like William the Conqueror and Henry II, England’s later kings like Poor John could not live up to the strength of his predecessors. On the other hand, France was the complete opposite, their kings only became stronger as the lineage went on. All of England’s and France’s shared methods gained each kingdom more power and so did the different methods. But there was one category which France took advantage of that England did not even consider. This category was gaining the support of the people. Tactics like ending serfdom, and creating a standing army forced France’s people to love the king and sustained their absolute monarchy, but power-hungry English kings mostly focused on themselves which resulted in the increase in power for themselves but the resentment of the people. The final straw was the weakness of John, England’s people took advantage of their own king’s weakness and completely shifted the way that their government had worked by creating Parliament, which resulted in England’s limited monarchy. In the end, it didn’t come down to which king used more different methods to gain power or used similar methods more effectively, it came down to who was better at keeping their people happy and France…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Louis was a conqueror- France was at war for thirty-three of the fifty-four years of his…

    • 2252 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis the XIV

    • 990 Words
    • 29 Pages

    Louis the XIV was king of France from 1693 to 1715. He was an example of how to rule for many of the political leaders of the 18th century. An absolute ruler is defined by seven traits. Pacify and subjugate nobles, and centralize power around oneself. Another is to make both money and war. Dominate culture, make religion and finally build something worthy of your glory. Two Enlightened despots that took after Louis were Joseph II of Austria and Peter the Great, Czar of Russia. Both rulers had enlightened and despotic characteristics. Yet Joseph was more Enlightened and Peter more despotic. Both characteristics were important to have a strong nation, but as Peter exemplifies having more despotic characteristics helps a ruler maintain power and strengthen the nation, more so then enlightened ones. Joseph II takes full power in 1780 after his mother Maria Theresa dies, instantly he begins to institute many enlightened ideas. Joseph is radical and makes many changes to long withstanding traditions in Austrian society and government. First, he grants religious freedom and cuts off communication between his state clergy and Rome. Though Austria had always been staunchly Catholic, now a person of any religion could practice it freely. This is a very enlightened idea much before its time. Also, it was one of his only major changes which were kept after his reign ended. This was how Joseph II fits under the trait of making religion work for you; he actually tried to make it work for everyone. Another enlightened reform he implemented was a universal law code in which all Austrians have to follow the same rules and suffer the same punishments. He eliminates noble privileges, in matters like taxation, and crimes. This reform angered the nobility and almost put the nation in crisis. But it was one last reform which set off a spark of rebellion. Joseph II outlawed serfdom, he freed millions of peasants. They were free to go wherever, and choose…

    • 990 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Everyone admired louis XIV for many reasons and it was a honor if he even chose you to watch his morning rituals people did anything to come close to him. louis was a great ruler from 1643- 1715,the reason louis had absolute power by having complete absolutism,money,and his army.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nationalist perspective of King Louis XIV is that the head of the country is the nation and for society to prosper the people have to be willing to serve and follow the leader’s will. The source’s perspective can be shown throughout history by the beliefs and values he had during his reign in France. The source believed in the uses of a social hierarchy and the absolute monarch. The social hierarchy benefited the people who were part of the Roman Catholic Clergy or nobility. These people received privileges and were not required to pay taxes. The rest of the population had a difficult and challenging way of living. They were required to serve the king by paying taxes which lead to poor living conditions, in which some died from starvation. The absolute monarch allowed all the power in France to be consolidated in the hands of the king. This allowed for King Louis XIV to be the main voice in France and gave the power to decide how the country will operate. These ideals were the main contributions to start of the French Revolution, many people felt that they deserved better rights which lead the nation members to revolt and seek a better constitution. The source would disagree with J.D Vance’s idea to bridge the gap between the rich and poor. King Louis XIV would believe that he should not have to…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XVI was one of the most incompetent and frankly idiotic rulers in the history of France. He would have absolutely nothing to do with his official duties as king, and his horribly decadent lifestyle contributed greatly to the economic plight France was in. The fact that he was married to Marie Antoinette, a native of Austria, France's sworn enemy, was very detrimental as well. Louis XVI inherited debt from previous rulers, but he made no move of any kind toward paying it off. In fact, he borrowed vast sums of money in order to give aid to the Americans in their revolution, which only worsened France's already outstanding deficit. In 1786, bankers refused to lend the government any more money, and Louis XVI was in serious trouble. Of course, all of this put Louis in a highly unfavorable position with the people of France, who absolutely despised him and his wife. Marie Antoinette was a major problem for Louis as well. She gave him poor advice on governing matters, spent large amounts of money on her own vanity, and was generally hated by the people the moment she set foot…

    • 1094 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays