Preview

Analysis Of The Social Contract Theory By Jean-Jacques Rousseau

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
537 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of The Social Contract Theory By Jean-Jacques Rousseau
The social contract theory Jean-Jacques Rousseau postulates a foundation of a governing goal in which is to protect equality and uphold individuality. It is to my readings Rousseau distinguished that, “All men where born free and but are put into chains by the societies in which they are born ( Bk 1; 1 ).” First law is to provide for his own preservation, first cares being those he owes to himself such as food, clothing and shelter. As soon as he can think for himself he now is the sole judge of the right way to take care of himself, making him a master of self (A.I Cohen). Family would be a primary model of political societies also the most ancient of all societies, being the only natural one is the tight nit group of the family (A.I Cohen). The father the head of the house and the children are his people. Being that were born free and equal we don’t give up our liberty without getting something in return. The state being the ruler doesn’t repay by love because its an institution therefore having no intentions or emotions but by the pleasure of solely being in charge (A.I. Cohen). As long as there are those who are being constrained to obey, it is …show more content…
Jean-Jacques Rousseau was under the impression that their was some sort of contract taking place amongst. The social contract is a political concept about agents exchanging their freedoms for protection from the ruling authority. Agents being born into this contract complying naturally by adhering to the rules set forth. A collective is created through this process, one that is necessarily created by and for the people that compose it. This state is legitimized because of the social contract on which it is based, equal because all have the same amount of equity in its success, useful due its only goal being that of the general will ( Bk 2; 4
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    American Government Study Guide: the Political Landscape
    • 4775 Words
    • 20 Pages

    American Government Study Guide: the Political Landscape

    The social contract theory is the belief that people are free and equal by natural right , and that this in turn requires that all people give their consent to be governed; espoused by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke and influential in the writing of the Declaration of Independence. Hobbes believed that a monarchial type of government was necessary to restrain humanity’s bestial tendencies because life without government was a “state of nature.” Stating that people will live like animals without rules. On the other hand, John Locke argued that the government’s major responsibility was the preservation of private property. He also denied the right that no king should govern but also that individuals were born with equal and natural rights.…

    • 4775 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The Declaration Of Rights Of Man And Citizen, By Jean Jacques Rousseau
    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing The Declaration Of Rights Of Man And Citizen, By Jean Jacques Rousseau

    By June 17, 1789, the king of France, Louis XVI, was out of money and the entire country was paying the price. The Estates General had convened, which signaled the failure of King Louis XVI to effectively manage the finances and estate system of his country. At this Estates General meeting, many representatives of the Third Estate disliked the system of voting by estates and broke off to form the National Assembly. The National Assembly of France then drafted the guiding document for the French Revolution, The “Declaration of Rights of Man and Citizen” on August 26, 1789. The ideals of natural rights and equality for men in this document came from the brilliant political philosophy of John Locke’s “The Second Treatise on Government.” This document was also influenced by Rousseau’s ideals of acting for the general will and popular sovereignty which he detailed in his book “The Social Contract.” “The Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen” is the most crucial element for the formation of a new government system in France because it used the ideals from John Locke and Rousseau to ensure equality, popular sovereignty, and freedom, which had so often been denied…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Ideas Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau Through The Lens Of Thomas Jefferson
    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Ideas Of Jean-Jacques Rousseau Through The Lens Of Thomas Jefferson

    In Jean-Jacques Rousseau 's “the Origin of Civil Society, Rousseau presents Ideas that, in his society, were considered very radical. He points out that a Society was in a natural state and that when we were that we were born free, and when we subject ourselves to a king, he must hold up certain rights and protect them, and in return they give him power, what Rosseau called the “Social Contract” . Thomas jefferson 's “Declaration of Independence” is Dirrived from Rousseau 's text about “rights” and “the Social Contract.” The ideas that Rousseau has written about are greatly applied to the ideas that Thomas…

    • 1565 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Madison And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis
    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madison And Rousseau: A Comparative Analysis

    Whereas Madison asserts that the State has no say over a person’s relationship with the Creator, Rousseau only rejects certain State religions on technical grounds and eventually concludes that society should demand a significant religious test. It is surprising that given Madison and Rousseau’s uniform goal, a stable society, they should come up with such widely varying methods for achieving it. One may be tempted to suggest that, unlike Rousseau, Madison considers individual rights to be more important than the proper functioning of society. Upon closer examination, however, it becomes clear that Madison and Rousseau's general disagreement on State power stems from a more fundamental dispute over how society works. According to Madison, society exists with a certain power and then instills this power in the government, while Rousseau argues that it is the creation of a government which makes society materialize. These disparate views on the directionality of government and society directly lead to Madison and Rousseau’s other…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosopher Thomas Rousseau Analysis
    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Philosopher Thomas Rousseau Analysis

    In the article that I read Philosopher Thomas Hobbes believed that people must surrender their freedom to a ruler. In the article, french philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau states that people should come together in societies and the solution was to form a social contract with general will or the common good.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Natural Rights, Social Contract, And Revolution
    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Natural Rights, Social Contract, And Revolution

    A social contract is a political philosophy which claims that the government and people are bound under a contract. The government is supposed to protect the people's rights and, in return, the people allow the government to rule. The theory had a huge impact on the ideals of the Founding Fathers, especially Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. This can be observed in the Declaration of Independence when it is written: “[T]hat to secure these rights, Government are are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent governed...” It is clearly a direct interpretation of Locke’s understanding of the social contract theory.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Hobbes And Rousseau Analysis
    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Hobbes And Rousseau Analysis

    In this paper, I will analyze both Hobbes’ and Rousseau’s view on the Nature of Man. Through my analysis of both, I will show contrast and comparison between both philosophical views. I will identify and explain the central aspect of the Nature of Man as identified by Hobbes and Rousseau and will make connections through a series of explanations and examples that were presented by Hobbes and Rousseau.…

    • 1774 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing Political Philosophies
    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing Political Philosophies

    The social contract or political contract is a theory or model, originating during the Age of Enlightenment, that typically addresses the questions of the origin of society and the legitimacy of the authority of the state over the individual. Social contract arguments typically posit that individuals have consented, either explicitly or tacitly, to surrender some of their freedoms and submit to the authority of the ruler or magistrate (or to the decision of a majority), in exchange for protection of their remaining rights. The question of the relation between natural and legal rights, therefore, is often an aspect of social contract theory.The most important contemporary political social contract theorist is John Rawls, who effectively resurrected social contract theory in the second half of the 20th century, along with David Gauthier, who is primarily a moral contractarian.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Comparing Machiavelli And Rousseau's The Origin Of Civil Society
    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparing Machiavelli And Rousseau's The Origin Of Civil Society

    When a father punishes his son for missing his curfew the son instinctively reacts with anger and disbelief. This instinctive behavior is what inspired government to begin with. Rousseau explains in his piece that government grew from family. Family was the first form of government on this planet. The children were bound to their father because they instinctively knew that they needed him for protection and growth. To some extent family is still a government even today. When a human being is born, he or she is incapable of thinking and doing things for themselves, so they are taken into the custody of their parents. The parents nurture them and teach them all they can until they are ready to face the world on their own. The child chooses to obey the parents while they are young because they know that everything is being done for their best…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Locke Vs Rousseau
    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Locke Vs Rousseau

    Rousseau and Locke both provide arguments for how they would protect their citizen’s liberty and equality. However, Rousseau’s society was more likely to protect their liberty and equality by establishing a political order, that was the Sovereign and the social contract. The Sovereign, looked over the general population and ensured that all the laws that were passed were for the general good, and the social contract would ensure that the Sovereign would not abuse their power for their own good. Locke, however, had the same idea except rather than having a social contract keeping checks on everyone, the legislative and executive branch would keep each other in check. Having people keep each other in check instead of relying on a social contract would be a more efficient way to ensure that one group could not abuse their power. Overall, however, Rousseau proposed a strategy that would protect the people’s liberty and…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Philosophers During The Enlightenment
    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Philosophers During The Enlightenment

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a French philosopher who wrote The Social Contract. He believed that men in the state of nature is blessed with an enviable total freedom. He believed in two types of freedom, freedom from need, and being physically free. He also believed that the government should work for a common good. In The Social Contract Rousseau wrote “Every man being having been born free and master of himself, no one else may under pretext whatever subject him without his consent. To assert that the son of a slave is born a slave is to assert that he is not born a…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Social Contract Theory
    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Social Contract Theory

    Todays media and entertainment have recently been flooded with movies and TV shows based on a post apocalyptic world where the world has fallen into disarray and it has become every man for themselves. While there have been many terrible crimes against humanity our world hasn’t submitted to dissolution and in large part we have remained united. The reason the world hasn’t fallen back into such a primitive state is because of the social contract theory; the social contract theory is a theory about creating rules for humanity. Due to the social contract theory people had to change the way they thought and made decisions and these personal decisions eventually had a ripple effect on the larger community. Unlike theories in physical science, social…

    • 1902 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Social Contract Law: Kant, Locke, And Rousseau
    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Social Contract Law: Kant, Locke, And Rousseau

    Similarly, in a Rousseauian fashion, Kant suggests that the state under a civil union cannot wrong its citizens since it only passes laws that its own citizens would give to themselves, hence “consent” to (MM, 6:314). But while these passages and the overall tone of Kant’s writings suggest he is a social contract thinker, a deeper investigation demonstrates a conflict with many of the other tenants of Kant’s thought. Not only do most of the important elements that make up Kant’s political philosophy appear to be established on things other than consent (Brandt, 1982; Mullholland, 1999); but even when considered in the aggregate, Kant’s political state seems to be missing any substantive aspect of the consent that remains so dear to the social contract theory.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Views of the Social Contract
    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Views of the Social Contract

    “Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains” (Rousseau). Is probably one of the most widely known quotes in the philosophical world. Rousseau explains in his Social Contract how all people are bound to some sort of convention in the entire span of their life. He starts out with his ideas of how some sort of contract has always been present, the natural contract of a parent and child. The parent cares for the child, and the child is dependent on the parent, giving up all its rights until it is of a more mature age, after a while it focuses solely on itself because that is human nature. This he relates to governments, how a ruler takes care of his subjects, and his subjects in turn give up everything for him, until they have a reason to not be loyal to him. Any loyalty or relations that are kept once people become independent is solely because it is voluntary, not necessary. It is a moral thing to do. Rousseau suggests, that in any social contract when people combine forces and still preserve their freedom for the state, such a state or a social contract has a distinct entity with a life and will of its own. Also in a social contract, a ruler is bound indirectly to the people, as in taking care of them or not harming them, because they are the ones who first allow the ruler to be there in the first place by subduing to him. He also talks about ownership of property. What is deemed legitimately…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Social Contract
    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Social Contract

    How was one to be able to be governed and still remain free men? The Social Contract was an agreement that was part moral and part political obligation that depended on the people to form society. The entire contract explains the aspects to answer this question (Rousseau, Jean Jacques. "The Social Contract."). The contract states that there is a way for a person to be part of a society, yet still be able to answer to themselves alone. Jean Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Hobbes, and John Locke all have different views on this contract.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics