Preview

Analysis Of Gun Violence By Ed Cohen

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
179 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Gun Violence By Ed Cohen
Seeing the mass shootings and gun violence issues at large gatherings that could have been prevented. Ed Cohan explores multiple different reasons about why gun laws should be made more strict. Ed Cohen utilizes examples to portray why America’s gun laws should be more strict. Cohen also explains how mass gun shootings could have been prevented if the gun laws were more strict. As the article goes on, Cohen debunks typical arguments for loose gun laws with examples of why these arguments are false. One common argument that Cohen has proved could be false was that guns are used for self defense. Cohen states that if no one had guns than their would be no point for a gun for self defense. Cohen also debunks another common argument, Guns deter

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Franklin E. Zimring’s article “Firearms, Violence and Public Policy” (published in Scientific American, Nov 1991), Zimring states that the public disagrees with laws over ownership of handguns. If the rate of handguns continues to increase, the national program will have to start limiting the availability of handguns. This would cost the U.S. billions of dollars which would show up early in the program. For the reason that reductions would decrease, the access of handguns would increase over time. With that being said, within 50 years, the number of handguns could exceed from 35 million to 50 million, if not greater.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    why the laws on firearms should be stricter, such as not allowing as powerful firearms on the…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun violence in America is not at all as bad as it is in Sierra Leone and other countries with war and little law enforcement as we read about in the book a long way gone. In the book the main character Ishmael discovers that America is not at all like he heard through rap songs. When he moves to America and tells his story of being a soldier and killing people the people he talks to about it think that it is cool and Ishmael states in the book “violence in America is romanticized. I do agree with this statement that we do make war look easy and fun through movies and video games. We do not understand what it is like to be in a war and witness killing and bloodshed every day.…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    New York Times best selling author, radio host, and Fox News contributor, Tammy Bruce, wrote an article called “Why Gun Control Won’t End Mass Murders.” Bruce’s purpose is to inform readers that gun control laws are not going to stop murders from occurring. She adopts a grim tone in order to get her readers to think about why the gun laws are the way they are. For years the government has been trying to enforce gun laws and yet murders rates are not decreasing. Some points Bruce addresses include mass shootings, liberals, and the Mayo Clinc’s statistics towards drugs. Tammy Bruce was not successful in getting her point across.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun control advocates focus on the serious negative effects on gun availability on safety, while gun ownership advocates emphasize the lawful use of guns and their place in our history and culture. While our history and culture is important we need to address the current national problem in order to live in a safe enough society. In an effort to stabilize and decrease firearm related injuries and deaths in the U.S. a strong federal law to control guns is needed. In the bigger picture, we people will see the United States, as a Nation, as a better safer place to live in and not to die…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun violence in Canada and America are often compared, both countries allow citizens to own guns to a certain extent. Michael Moore who stars in “Bowling for Columbine” talks about how the two countries are so similar but gun violence isn't a problem in Canada. Within the movie, Michael goes house to house in a canadian city called toronto unlocking people's front doors, after hearing multiple responses he discovered that most Canadians aren't worried about intruders. The news and media do not betray violence as a main topic, resulting in people feeling safe and being able to trust their Government. In Canada there is no legal right saying citizens are allowed to carry guns or own automatic weapons, handguns. Hunting and target practice are the main reasons someone would buy a gun in Canada, a recent survey shows ninety five percent of citizens own long guns and only twelve percent own handguns. Transportation of guns is also very limited in Canada, certain permits showing where and why you're carrying the weapon have to be on hand at all times. All guns must be registered with proper documents to ensure safety.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Gun Violence Case Study

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For many, mental health and gun violence seem to go hand in hand. While it seems logical that individuals that perpetrate mass shootings must have some mental illness such as in the case of Adam Lanza who in December 2012 carried out one of the most tragic mass shootings at the Sandy Hook elementary school in Newtown Connecticut. In that shooting Lanza, who was 20 years old at the time, killed his mother then went on to slaughter 6 adults and 20 children between the ages of 6 and 7 and finally taking his own life. (Connecticut Shootings Fast Facts - CNN.com) Lanza had in fact had been diagnosed with having Autism Spectrum Disorder which is characterized by “persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction across multiple…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Until today, Americans have not reached consensus on gun-control laws. People who disagree with stricter laws have been saying that "more guns help protect citizens" because with guns they can defend themselves. However, people who support more restrictive regulations claim that loose gun-control leads to an insecure society ("Gun Control"). Because both sides have persuasive reasons for or against gun-control laws, we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gun Control Debacles

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    The reason why gun control is one of today’s most provocative topics and a huge social problem for society is because gun violence and senseless shootings…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time I look around someone is dying. Its so crazy how close this topic is to me. I chose this topic on a Tuesday and on the very next day (Wednesday) a close friend of mine was shot and killed. So as I write his Essay I can't help but to think about him, his name was Alex Bland 21yr old. From the years of 2002-2006, 687 Chicago youth were killed by guns, and firearms are used in 10 out of 14 murder-suicide in Illinois. In 2005 71% (435) of the homicides and 36% (164) of suicides were committed with firearm from close by Counties.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Abolish Mass Shootings

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Despite the evidence found that gun control in fact could decline crime, some individuals refuse to believe so. One of those individuals is, Kit Daniels, a Texas journalist. Daniels in his article “10 reasons why gun control will not work” argues that putting a restriction on gun laws will not stop mass killings or gun related deaths nationwide, because individuals who are set out kill will find a way around these restrictions. Daniels then proceeds to argue that a limit on obtaining guns is a violation to the second amendment (Daniels). The argument that Daniels argues which is that gun control will not abolish mass shootings is accurate to an extend. As Daniels argues individuals who want are set out to kill others will proceed to do so.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Russ Thurman’s article, “Guns up. Crime down. Anti-gun mum.” he discusses how anti-gun advocates have had nothing to say about facts revealing that with more people owning guns, crime rates have gotten lower. (“During the past six months, studies have shown that while gun ownership is at an all-time high, violent crime is at a 30 year low…”) The article is clearly structured and easy to read. Although wanting to prove a point to anti-gun and pro-gun control advocates, Mr. Thurman avoids the use of slang, jargon, angry words or vagueness. Nor does he appear to “lash out” at the other side. He simply states straight to the point facts with clear and valid evidence. He denounces anti-gun and pro-gun control advocates theme-“guns equal crime”-with supportive evidence. Drawing statistics from The National Academy of Sciences, the Centers for Disease Control and the U.S. Department of Justice, Mr. Thurman proves wrong, a high belief of pro-gun control advocates, that government restrictions on firearms reduces gun violence. He found that studies done by the Centers of Disease Control show that there is no meaningful proof that gun control efforts have any affect on crime control. In addition, he goes on to prove that those restrictions also do not reduce gun crime, gun violence or gun accidents.…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    ”Nearly three weeks after the latest mass shooting claimed the lives of nine people, 52% of Americans now oppose stricter gun control laws, 6 percentage points more than the 46% of Americans who support such laws.”(diamond,2015).In the past year, there has been many shootings. If the guns are taken away, some of these could have been solved but that’s only solving one problem. Taking them isn’t helping the helpless people that can’t defend themselves without them.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stricter Gun Laws

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anything could be used as a weapon to hurt or kill someone. Criminals could create weapons from things found in local stores such as Home Depot, Lowes, or any other hardware store. By making weapons instead of purchasing, no one knows if he or she is creating a weapon or just using the tools for its intended purpose. People also buy chemicals off the internet to create bombs that can kill numerous amounts of people. Even by making guns illegal for citizens, this law won’t change a thing for criminals that make weapons to kill people. By taking away our rights to bear arms citizens are left with less protection. Guns aren’t the reason people are killed, it’s the criminals that use them. “You can’t blame the gun any more than you blame the car after a fatal accident… you punish the individuals.”(Sepcoski 2).…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most debatable topics in the United States is the availability of guns. The debate on the topic of gun laws focuses on those who believe that owning guns is a Constitutional right while others believe that owning guns is a leading cause of much of the violence within the United States. However, there is a balance between the two debates that will lead to a better conclusion to the topic. Making guns illegal will only lead to criminals possessing illegal firearms while the law abiding citizens will be faced with the threat of criminals with firearms while they have no source of protection. At the same time, the current laws do not require every state to follow laws that would allow for the government to ensure that the firearms do not legally fall into the hands of criminals or those not responsible to own firearms.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays