Preview

African Culture

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
500 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
African Culture
Nearly two hundred and fifty years ago the United States Constitution was ratified by nine of the original thirteen states. The ratification of this document would lay the framework for the land of liberty that is currently the United States of America. I wish I could have been present in Philadelphia to watch the proceedings of this defining moment in history. As with all great things, controversy has followed the Constitution. Many theories have been presented that outline a group of powerful and wealthy leaders pushing the passage of what they would call, a safe investment. The theory, and that is all it is, that the driving force behind the United State's Constitution was to protect economic interest is utterly absurd and invalid. The framers of the Constitution were extremely intelligent men that drafted a guide to government for an incredibly young country. The document they created has stood strong as the fundamental backbone of our great nation. The men that convened in Philadelphia in 1787 were there for one purpose; to stabilize a central government and, in turn, allow the development of a great nation. After living unsuccessfully under the Articles of Confederation, most federalist sought a sturdy central government that would reign supreme over state governments fueled by ulterior motives. The framers of the Constitution drafted the document with the well-being and future of our country at the front of their mind. Not the idea of economic potential and return. These men had lived under the tyrannical rule of Great Britain. They had witnessed the devastating effects wealth, power, and greed could have on the leaders of society. The framers saw the Constitutional Convention has a chance to set things straight, once and for all. In the years that have followed since the ratification of the Constitution, the powers expressed to both the national and state governments have been implored to benefit the common market created by the central government.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Constitutional Convention was inspired because the economic turmoil and with domestic tranquility had going crazy so congress passe3d a official resolution. This was the purpose of “the sole and expressing of revising the Articles of Confederation.…

    • 406 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    When fifty-five delegates from eleven of the thirteen states met in Philadelphia in May of 1787 (four years after the Revolutionary War) for a Constitutional Convention, one of their biggest concerns was to establish a government that did not create any kind of tyranny. Tyranny is the abuse of power by one supreme ruler, like a dictator or king. Tyranny can also happen if a few people (such as several generals or religious leaders) seize control of something or if the majority denies a minority’s rights. The abuse of power can lead to the destruction of a whole country. For this reason, the Framers of the Constitution decided to create a new constitution to replace the existing Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles, there was no court system, no chief executive, and not even a way for the government to force a state to pay taxes, which made the government weak. The new constitution needed to be strong so that it could hold our nation together, and yet limit the authority of individual groups to prevent tyranny from happening. The framers decided to use the Constitution to guard against tyranny with four methods. These methods were giving states a more equal representation in Congress, Federalism, separation of powers, and checks and balances.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rebecca Kvamso Total views: 10 (Your views: 3) Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST Edited Date Sunday, March 3, 2013 8:16:22 PM CST The Articles of the Confederation was the first written constitution it was drafted by congress in 1777 and ratified four years later. There was just one house of congress. Each state was given one vote regardless of size, population, or wealth. Declaring war, foreign affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the affairs and making treaties with other governments was the only specified powers of the new government. The Articles was not so much a guideline for government but more like a peace treaty and unity pact among the states. The states wanted to be seen and respected as a nation but able to conduct themselves within that nation as independent, separate entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent. entities. There were no tax laws or regulations on import/ export taxes. No formula to pay national debt. States were supposed to just contribute as they seen fit. This seems to be a recipe for chaos. To amend the Articles took unanimous consent Without regulation or a way to enforce it, the economy was going downhill fast. Many believed anarchy would soon result without a stronger unified government. Andrew Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and Hamilton insisted a genuine liberty required “a proper degree of authority to make and exercise the laws.” In 1787 the decision was made to not to amend the Articles of Confederation, but instead to draft a new constitution Only 4000 words The Constitution of the United States outlines two basic principles division of powers and a system of checks and balances. The constitution is the outline for a three…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ ratify

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787 yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Some members of congress believed that the Articles of confederation needed to be changed meanwhile others disagreed. After the revolutionary war the people needed a sense of power which they received when the new government was centered on the state. The new United States needed a strong central government but many feared of a central government with too much power. This called for a new constitution which caused great conflict between the Federalists and Anti-Federalist.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Before the state convention, there is a great issue about liberty. One proponents of the Constitution are federalists who favor to establish a stronger national government; one opponents of the Constitution are anti-federalists who favor to establish a weaker national government. Federalists think only a stronger national government have an ability to keep the states in control. Anti-federalists think the states should have more power than the national government. Even though the conflict between federalist and anti-federalist doesn't stop, whether it is a federalists or anti-federalists, they have the same dream to united the states to become a strong country. The perfect decision is to use the best way to administrate the country and stabilize the society. In my opinion, a stronger national government will keep the country developing.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    U.S Constitution DBQ

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The writing of the U.S Constitution generated many concerns over the amount of power to be allowed in the Federal Government. Political parties of Federalists and Antifederalists formed, sparking debate over the issue. As Federalists supported the proposed U.S Constitution, Antifederalists supported the government formed under the Articles of Confederation. Federalists felt that a strong central government would give protection to public and private credit. Many large landowners, judges, lawyers, leading clergymen, political figures, and merchants were in favor of ratifying the U.S Constitution. James Madison writes in Federalist Papers #10, “Complaints are everywhere heard from our most considerate and virtuous citizens, equally the friends of public and private faith and public of personal liberty, that our governments are too unstable” (Doc. A). Congressmen such as Madison strongly supported a stronger Federal Government. The existing government under the Articles of Confederation needed to be altered to ensure more control over the states. Federalists believed that if change wasn’t made the nation would fail. “Either the…

    • 1101 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Framers of the Constitution represented the ideas for America’s government, not for the people themselves. The Founding Fathers had goals for America, and had visions of what they wanted for the government and citizens. Some of these objectives included: establishing justice, form a more perfect union, provide for the common defense, and making a more perfect society. All of these ideas represented the ideas for the government, but not necessarily America’s people…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Also, After much argument, the Constitution was written to create, "a perfect union" between the states. Generally Speaking, these remarkable circumstances lead about the constitutional convention was something important that people at the time recognized; this was that most governments were the result of either chance or war. They knew that they were calmly disputing the laws of what would lay the foundation of the United States and try to create a capable government. They realized that this Governing body would be a unique moment in world history based on the ideas of Philosophers and Scholars such as John Locke. Also, prior documents such as the Magna Carta brought the foundation of the constitution. However, the Framers knew if they were unsuccessful at what they were doing this would be the general misfortune of all humankind unless they proved that you could create a government with rational…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Revolutionary War was over and the Americans had won their independence, the revolutionists and republicans leading the new country were quite convinced that their government should differ from that of Britain and have a limited amount of power. Clearly, these men took these ideals more seriously than they should have. They created a constitution for the 13 states known as the Articles of Confederation, which put the majority of power in the hands of these individual states. They were adopted in 1777 after the war and enacted in 1781. The Articles of Confederation were quite a success pertaining to western lands, but proved unbeneficial for the economy of our new country.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the heels of the revolutionary war and the failed attempt of a national government (The Articles of Confederation), the leaders of the United States set to make a stronger, centralized government, with dual sovereignty between the national government and the states. The rules of this governing body would be laid out in a document called the Constitution. Although most leaders supported the constitution they did not agree on many aspects of it. Out of the disagreement two groups emerged, the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. The Federalist supported all aspects of the constitution and a larger national government, while the Anti-Federalist opposed ratifying the constitution and supported a smaller national government and more sovereignty to the states. This disagreement led to a fierce debate between the two groups that still resonates today. This essay will examine the primary…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Founding Fathers of the United States had one goal in mind- American Liberty. This could be achieved in many different ways, hence the reason that many of the Founding Fathers disputed over how the U.S. government should be run. One of the most influential disputed that there were occurred during the Constitutional Convention. It was unknown how much power to give to the Federal government.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why did our Founding Fathers create the Constitution and how is it relevant to our country today? To begin, prior to the creation of the Constitution, the Articles of Confederation was the main document that the people of the United States abided by. The Articles of Confederation was not a well-liked document and therefore, it is not well-known today. This document posed many ongoing issues and challenges for the growing United States. First of all, it granted the states an overarching amount of freedom and power. The government held almost no power and could not collect taxes, enforce laws, build an army, enforce treaties, or have a national court system. Therefore, our Founding Fathers went through the process to implement a United States…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Then also The Articles of Confederation was used as the United State’s first constitution, and four years later it was in use on March 1, 1781. And it was made so the states could remain in power and independent, With the Congress serving as a last resort to appeal disputes. Also the Congress was given the power to make treaties and alliances with other groups/people, And to continue maintaining the armed forces and coin money. However In 1787, The Constitutional Convention was created for the creation of new federal laws, The most likely cause of the Constitutional Convention to be made was because of the ability to levy taxes and regulate trade. Later…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    But one thing was certain, something had to be changed. THe Articles of Confederation had a lot of weaknesses that introduced a great deal of interstate conflict, something that delegates, through the drafting of the Constitution, tried their best to solve. However, under the Articles, when the Founding Fathers signed the Constitution in 1787, it needed the ratification from nine states before it could go into effect. This was not easy. And the push for ratification brought on a seemingly endless barrage of documents, articles, and pamphlets both supporting and opposing it. There were two sides to the Great Debate: the Federalists and the Anti Federalists. The Federalists wanted to ratify the Constitution, the Anti-Federalists did not. One of the major issues these two parties debated concerned the inclusion of the Bill of Rights. The Federalists felt that this addition wasn't necessary, because they believed that the Constitution as it stood only limited the government not the people. The Anti- Federalists claimed the Constitution gave the central government too much power, and without a Bill of Rights the people would be at risk of…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, yet there was a struggle for its ratification that went on until 1790. Members of Congress believed that the Articles of Confederation, the first government of the United States, needed to be altered while others did not want change. After the Revolutionary War, there was a need for strong state centered governments, rather than a strong central government based on their experience as a colony. However, an investigation of the historical record reveals that the Articles of Confederation were not meeting the needs of Americans, and the need for a new Constitution was desired. This desired Constitution created a huge dispute and argument between the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays