Preview

Advantages and Disadvantages of the Parliamentary System.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2122 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Parliamentary System.
aThe parliamentary system is one of three most widely used democratic forms of government. It is mainly used by European countries and Commonwealth nations. The former subscribe to the West German model while the latter uses the Westminster model. It is a system whereby the Executive branch is supported either directly or indirectly by the legislative. The head of government, who leads day to day affairs of government, is separate with the head of state that has a ceremonious function. Some parliamentary nations merge the role of the president and prime minister such as South Africa where the president is also a member of parliament. Like all forms of government, there are advantages and disadvantages which shall be discussed below.
As mentioned above, this system has many advantages. Firstly and most importantly, it is easier and faster to pass legislation compared to the presidential system which leads to a smoother governance. Usually a bill becomes law within a single session of parliament. In a presidential system specifically in the United States of America (US), the time taken to pass a bill can be anywhere from a few weeks to many years. Many bills though do not get pass. The ease in legislation is due to the structure of this system whereby the majority grouping in the lower house i.e. the direct representatives of the people forms the executive. Thus the executive have the majority support and votes to pass legislation. This is important as it usually prevents legislative gridlock especially in passing the government budget and provides quick response in national emergencies. For example due to opposing parties between houses of Congress, the US had not pass a budget in four years where as Japan’s Diet passed a reconstruction bill within a month after the 2011 tsunami.
Secondly, government policies are based more on consensus. Executive power is more spread out among Cabinet ministers unlike in the presidential system where power is focused in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    MacKinnon, Leslie. "Preston Manning: Renovate the Senate or tear it down." CBCnews. CBC/Radio Canada, 22 Jan. 2014. Web. 11 Mar. 2014. .…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Apush Chapter 6 Summary

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Chapter 12: The Presidency I. Presidents and prime ministers A. Characteristics of parliaments 1. Parliamentary system twice as common 2. Chief executive chosen by legislature 3. Cabinet ministers chosen from among members of parliament 4. Prime minister remains in power as long as his or her party or coalition maintains a majority in the legislature B. Differences 5. Presidents are often outsiders; prime ministers are always insiders, chosen by party members in parliament 6. Presidents choose their cabinet from outside Congress; prime ministers choose members of parliament 7. Presidents have no guaranteed majority in the legislature; prime ministers…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Similar to Canada, the American system is tripartite having the executive (President),the legislature made up of Senate and Congress, and the judiciary. As Lijphart hascommented, a major difference between the two systems is in the U.S., the executive is a one person executive made up of just the President. Ostensibly the U.S. has the equivalent in thathas a cabinet population by the various secretaries (health, education, defence, etc.), butconstitutionally they are not part of the executive. This yields a disadvantage especially inthe situations of having to make critical or tough…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civics Eoc Study Guide

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Parliamentary – a system of government in which both executive and legislative function reside in an elected assembly.…

    • 3272 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government in the UK is a representative body elected for and by the people. The UK uses the parliamentary system as its model of representation; this means the different areas of government which are the legislative, judiciary and executive branches work in and through each other as opposed to the Presidential model which separates the powers. Westminster Parliament is the acting microcosm for the UK society; it is a small group of 365 MPs who are chosen to represent their constituencies. Each MP is given power through trusteeship when voted in, this meaning that they will try to carry out what is best for their constituency. They are also once voted in known as a mandate, the authority granted by a constituency to an MP to act as its representative.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Governments play a large part in our lives. We are so used to their role, that much of their influence goes unnoticed. Governments differ from country to country, but their influence remains. Canada is a democracy with a parliamentary system of government. The United States of America is also a democracy but with a presidential system of government. Canada's parliament consists of the Queen, the Senate and the House of Commons. In the Canadian parliamentary system the Prime Minister is the Head of Government and is also a member of the House of Commons. The Prime Minister is the leader of the winning party in the federal election. This person is appointed by the Governor General as the Prime Minister. Even though they are appointed, they are elected first. The American system of government is established by the United States Constitution, which provides for three separate but equal branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Together, these branches govern the country. In the American presidential system the President is the head of government and chief executive officer. Both Canada and the United States are representative democracies with a federal structure. I prefer The Canadian parliamentary system of government over the American Presidential system of government. The leader of a political party in the American presidential system of government may only be reelected once. The leader of the political party in the American presidential system of government is not a member of Congress (legislative branch). As well, Voters must wait for regular elections to unseat an unsatisfactory president or member of Congress. In this essay the three branches of government, elections in the United States and Canada, the Head of State, similarities and differences to both systems of governments and the strengths and weaknesses to both systems of government will be examined and explained in depth for a better understanding of both the Canadian Parliamentary…

    • 1969 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Westminster model and parliamentary democracy are effective because society is free to show whether they disapprove of policies or elements of parliaments and they can protest against them. There is also a lot of political diversity and many different ways to get involved and engage in politics, for example, pressure groups use various forms of advocacy in order to influence public opinion and/or policy.…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “The Preamble to the Parliament Act 1911 envisaged reforming the composition of the House of Lords to create a fully-elected Chamber.” To date all attempts have been unsuccessful. Explain the difficulties entailed in reforming the composition of the Lords and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of an elected second chamber.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated in the text, what we have now in the United States is a "winner takes all" system. Switching to a Parliamentary system is highly unlikely since our founders chose a completely different path. With Congress only needing two-thirds of the vote to win, it allows elected officials the power to change or not change the law based on their interests and sometimes . In years where the majority of one party rules over another, in favor of certain agendas, it risks the important minority vote. Of course, the President has the power to veto.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Madison's Dilemma

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages

    There are many systems of governments that can be classified into different types. Some of them being common amongst countries and some of them not so much. The two main organizations and/or alternatives that are most familiar are the presidential systems and the parliamentary systems. Various distinctions between these two types of systems can be distinguished. In a presidential system, the president is set apart from the legislative branch where as in the parliamentary system the chief executive (prime minister) is part of the legislative branch (the parliament).…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare, critically, the organization of Government in Canada and the United States. The parliamentary system is constructed of the crown, executive and legislative branch. The constitution monarchy is that the the Crown which is the Queen is represented by the GG. The executive branch are the PM and the Cabinet, in the Parliamentary system, they are elected members of the parliament. The legislative branch is parliament includes the opposition. This shows that the government is very complex. In the parliamentary system we have separation of powers meaning each branch is separate. The US system is not as different as the Canadian system because check and balance. Example, president appoint judges. currently, congress refuse to confirm. 100 judges not confirm.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    ways when comparisons are drawn from two similarly strong western liberal democratic systems. They both enjoy the same fundamental principles of liberal democracy, with those living under this system enjoying the same rights and freedoms with comparable economic conditions. The real difference between these two systems lies in the division of power (). Parliamentarism has been defined as having the parliament as the only democratically legitimate institution is parliament, whereby the government’s authority is completely dependent upon parliamentary confidence. (). While argues that there are three conditions necessary to declare a system parliamentary: All major government decisions must be taken by people chosen in elections conducted along party lines. Policy must be decided within governing party (parties if coalition). The highest officials (ministers) must be selected within their parties and be responsible to the people through their parties. On the other hand, in presidential systems according to , an executive with considerable constitutional powers - generally including full control of the composition of the cabinet and administration - is directly for a fixed term. The president is also the symbolic Head of State.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since the United States runs on a bicameral legislature, there are glaring differences between each house.The Senate is an assembly or a council of citizens having the highest deliberative and legislative functions in a government. The House is a legislative or deliberative assembly that starts the political process. However, both houses are required to work together in order for government to work properly. This article will examine the many differences and similarities between two of the most important parts of American Government.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Political Science Paper

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A parliamentary system is a system of governing in which there is a close interrelationship between the Prime Minister and the parliament (Mintz, Close, Croci 325). A presidential system is a system of governing in which the president and congress each separately derive their authority from being elected by the people, and has a fixed term of office (Mintz, Close, Croci 349). When dealing with the strengths of a parliamentary system, we must first consider responsible government. Responsible government is when the political executive is accountable to parliament for its actions and mist retain the support of the elected members to remain in office (Mintz, Close, Croci 325). Of course, in the presidential system, there is no form of responsible government. This to me is a weakness of presidential systems. There are three…

    • 2048 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Germany the chancellor is an extension of the legislature whereas in the united states the president and legislature may be separate as voters vote for both in different elections. The system in the united states that purposefully gave both congress and the executive a lot of power in order to check each other…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays