The term separation of powers refers to the separation of powers between executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. The American system of government has three separate but equal branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Together, these branches govern the country. The legislative branch of the federal government consists of the Congress. The Congress is divided into two chambers: the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each member of Congress is elected by the people of his or her state. Membership in the Senate is based on regional representation. That is two members from each state have 100 seats. Membership in the House of Representatives is based on representation by population. That is membership is based on state population and has 435 seats. The president is head of the executive branch. The president is also the Commander in Chief of the Armed forces. The president serves a four year term and may only be reelected once. The president lives and works in the White House. The president appoints the Cabinet and oversees the various agencies and departments of the federal government. The judicial branch interprets the law and consists of the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts. Appointees to the federal bench serve for life or until they voluntarily resign or retire.
In the Canadian Parliamentary system the Prime Minister and the Cabinet represent the executive branch and are responsible to the House of Commons. Almost all the members of the Cabinet must be Members of the House of Commons. By custom, if possible, every province must have at least one Cabinet Minister. The speaker of the House of Commons is appointed by the Governor General on the recommendation of the Prime Minister and must be a member of the House of Commons. Senators are appointed by the Governor General on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, to represent the provinces. Parliament is the legislative branch of the federal government in Canada. Parliament is made up of the Senate which is appointed on the Prime Minister's recommendation and the House of Commons which is elected by voters and consists of government members and opposition members. The judicial branch consists of The Supreme Court of Canada. The Supreme Court of Canada is the highest court in the land; they interpret the laws but they do not make them.
Elections in the United States are held every four years. The President may only be reelected once. A candidate for president must run in four elections, and campaigning for the presidency starts about two years before the actual election year. Primaries are considered the first step to an election or first election. Primaries choose delegates to attend the national convention of either the Democratic or Republican Party. Not all fifty states have primaries and in that case some states hold caucuses or state party meetings to choose delegates. Delegates are committed to support a specific candidate for the party's nomination. The general election or third election is held on the first Tuesday in November. This popular vote indirectly chooses a President. The voters elect electors. Electors are appointed by the two parties' to vote for their party's candidate in the fourth and final election. A state has many electors or electoral votes as it has members of Congress. On the third Monday of December, the electors which are members of the Electoral College meet in their states to choose the president. If the majority of people in a state voted Democratic, then all the states electoral votes go to the Democratic candidate and the same goes if the majority of people in a state voted Republican, then all the states electoral votes go to the Republican candidate. In early January the electoral votes are counted, and the successful presidential candidate will take office.
Elections in Canada are held once every five years. Prime Ministers have the power to call an election sooner and they usually do so when they sense electoral victory. Canada is divided into 301 electoral districts commonly called constituencies and this reflects the democratic principle of representation by population. In each constituency, members of the various political parties meet to choose a candidate to represent them in the election. Canadians tend to vote for a political party rather than for an individual. The Candidate with the greatest number of votes is elected to represent the constituency in the legislature. The party with the greatest number of candidates elected to the legislature forms the government and its leader becomes the Prime Minister. A majority government occurs when the number of seats elected is greater than fifty percent. If the number elected is less than fifty percent, a minority government results. A minority government requires support from elected members of another political party in order to remain in power.
The Queen is the formal head of Sate in Canada. She is represented federally by the governor general, and provincially by the Lieutenant-Governors. Federal or provincial bills cannot become laws without the Royal consent. The Governor General and the Lieutenant-Governors must sign bills that become law and they have the right to question the government. The Prime Minister is the head of government and is also the member of the House of Commons. The Prime Minister is the leader of the political party with the most seats in the House of Commons. The Prime Minister serves a maximum term of five years but may be reelected indefinitely. The Prime Minister proposes policies for the country, selects cabinet members and is responsible to Parliament and must resign upon the loss of the support of the House of Commons.
In the United States, the President is the head of government and chief executive officer. The President is elected to a four-year term of office and may only be reelected once. The President is not a member of Congress. The president proposes policies for the country and selects Cabinet members. Even if proposals are defeated the office of the President is retained. The President signs or vetoes bills passed by Congress and is the commander-in-chief of the armed forces.
There are many differences, similarities, strengths and weakness between the United States and Canada. Both Canada and the United States are democracies and share a commitment to democratic principles. However, both Canada and the United States have chosen to organize their governments differently. The United States has just one basic language for its federal government and for every state; it is a country of one basic language and culture. On the other hand, Canada is a bilingual country with two official languages (French and English) and has very strong regional differences. Another difference between the United States and Canada lies in the constitution. Canada is a constitutional monarchy and The United States is a republic. Canada has a parliamentary government, while the Americans have a presidential-congressional government. The presidential-congressional government is neither responsible nor responsive while, the Parliamentary-cabinet government is both responsible and responsive.
Strengths to a Parliamentary system of government include: with a majority, the government has power to govern, the non-confidence vote provides a check on the government and a voter can make decisions on the basis of party platform. Strengths to a Presidential system of government include: checks and balances limit the power of the branches of government and without party discipline members may be constituency oriented. Weaknesses to both systems of governments include: in a parliamentary system, the government is unstable if a majority is not obtained and the majority government has a lot of power and may be insensitive to the people's desires. In a presidential system, the separation of power may fragment the system making it unproductive and voters must wait for regular elections to unseat an unsatisfactory president or member of Congress.
In conclusion, governments play a large part in our lives. Canada is a democracy with a parliamentary system of government. The United States of America is also a democracy but with a presidential system of government. The American system of government has three separate but equal branches of government: legislative, executive, and judicial. Together, these branches govern the country. The legislative branch of the federal government consists of the Congress. The president is head of the executive branch. The judicial branch interprets the law and consists of the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts. Elections in the United States are held every four years. The president may only be reelected once. Elections in Canada are held once every five years. Prime Ministers have the power to call an election sooner and they usually do so when they sense electoral victory. The Queen is the formal head of State in Canada. She is represented federally by the governor general, and provincially by the Lieutenant-Governors. The Prime Minister is the leader of the political party with the most seats in the House of Commons. The Prime Minister serves a maximum term of five years but may be reelected indefinitely. In the United States, the President is the head of government and chief executive officer. The President is elected to a four-year term of office and may only be reelected once. There are many differences, similarities, strengths and weakness between the United States and Canada. The United States has just one basic language for its federal government and for every state it is a country of one basic language and culture. On the other hand, Canada is a bilingual country with two official languages (French and English) and very strong regional differences. One strength to a Parliamentary system is with a majority, the government has power to govern and one weakness is in a parliamentary system, the government is unstable if a majority is not obtained. One strength to a Presidential system of government is that checks and balances limit the power of the branches of government and one weakness is voters must wait for regular elections to unseat an unsatisfactory president or member of Congress.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
July 1st 1867 marks the date that Canada confederated into a nation dedicated to promote democracy. Canada would be governed by a Parliamentary system consisting of an upper and lower chamber of legislation. The House of Commons, being the lower chamber is made up of elected representatives from across the country, democratically voting upon bills. The upper chamber, the Senate is made up of 105 individuals specifically appointed by the Governor General to represent certain geographical areas across the country. The Senate is primarily responsible for providing a “sober second thought”…
- 1186 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
Canada and Germany are countries that have different political ideologies also they have some parts of government bear similarities.Although they are two different country, there are have three clear difference between two government systems they use.First, Canada has a three parts of parliament,with House of Common, Senate and Government Governor. In contrast, Germany only have two parts of parliament,with a Bundestag and Bundersrat.Secondly, Canada is president have power, but in Germany is Chancellor.Finally, compare advantage and disadvantage of two government system, Germany’s goverment system is more…
- 87 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
In theory, the Parliament is the most important institution in the Canadian government and all members of the parliament are equal. The Prime Minister is supposed to be primus inter pares, meaning first among equals. But over the years, the cabinet has become more institutionalized and less departmentalized. Hence the Prime Minister’s power has increased over the years. Canada is the one of the most decentralized federations in the World. Power is swung away from the parliament and is more concentrated in the executive branch (Courtney, 1984: p. 241). The Prime Ministers is not too powerful in a global scale but it has substantial power within Canada. However the power of the Prime Minister can also be affected by many different factors. .…
- 2075 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
Canada has long been regarded as a rich and democratic country that’s very well developed. The secret behind this is like the famous quote from history,“United we stand, divided we fall”. Canada has a government requiring all the provinces to contribute and each region has its own advantage and drawbacks. Together, we are able to cover each other’s weaknesses and improve as a Confederation.…
- 672 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
A good government is a reflection of its citizens. The mechanics of a good government distinguish it from different governments around the world. However, how a government elects its leader is a big part of the way it runs in general. Many governments have different systems in which they elect their leader. In North America, electing a leader is a big responsibility for the citizens of that country. Particularly in Canada, our electoral system has been the same for many years and relies on the citizens to make a decision. Canada uses a system called first-past the-post or single member plurality . This system consists of a simple objective; to receive a majority of the votes . This system has worked well for many years without any major issues.…
- 1922 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
Second to the Governor General of Canada, the position of the Canadian Prime Minister is the single highest power a public servant can obtain. The residual power that the Governor General holds under the monarchy of Britain gives the Governor General the ultimate and final say in all major matters concerning Canada’s intergovernmental affairs. An example of this is Michelle Jean proroguing the parliament by the request of Steven Harper to delay a potential vote on the motion of non-confidence during 2008-2009 Canadian parliamentary disputes (CBC News, 2008). In a fair democratic process, the Prime Minister has a variety of powers that he or she can enforce while maintaining constant checks and balances within caucus, various opposing political parties and the very influential media. Here in Canada, under the constitutional monarchy of Britain, citizens are fortunate that the Prime Minister often acts rationally with the powers he or she has. Similar to the United States of America, they share the same standards under a democratic state that the Presidential role is held under check by other potential powers to be. The ultimate right of a Prime Minister is to make the call for a general election; a very important and significant power. One of the most important calls a Canadian Prime Minister can make is to dissolve a government simply by seeking the consent of the Governor General of Canada. More recently with the move toward fixed election dates, the Prime Minister has limitations on his or her ability to call an election when they want; however, under specific and certain anomalies in parliament, this power can still be exercised. Expected requirements are the Prime Ministers right to appoint members to the cabinet, appoint civil…
- 2236 Words
- 9 Pages
Better Essays -
The Canadian Parliament is divided into various branches, the Legislative Branch and the Executive Branch, both of which are represented by the Queen who in turn is represented by the Governor General. The Executive branch represents the Prime Minister and his Cabinet, and The Legislative represents the House of Commons and the Senate. The Parliament of Canada has three branches, The Queen who appoints a Governor General to represent the Queen on her behalf, The House of Commons and then The Senate. The House of Common’s is the lower house of Parliament, and The Senate is the Upper half of the Canadian Parliament.…
- 1005 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The debate on which form of democracy, representative versus parliamentary, can best manage a global energy crisis is a matter of much concern. The study addresses the following question: which form of democracy, U.S. representative versus British parliamentary can best manage a global oil crisis between 2009-2011? The question is important to address because understanding which form of democracy, U.S. representative versus British parliamentary can best manage a global oil crisis between 2009-2011 is critical in assessing the efficiencies of democratic energy decision making.…
- 1163 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
My research paper will discuss the proposal of institutional reform concerning the function of Governor General. Canada is a constitutional monarchy and the role of the Governor General is to represent Canada as a whole in replace of the Crown or the Queen. Since Canada has no longer any real ties with the British Sovereignty in terms of government rules many would argue if the role of the Governor General has any significance to being an important political actor in Canada’s Constitution. To begin this paper, I will discuss a brief overview on what the role of a Governor General is, their formal powers and executive powers, dignified and efficient. My research paper will then emphasize on an institutional reform in regards to the function of the Governor General, it will discuss why Canada does not need a representation of the Crown any longer since the Governor General’s actions are mainly symbolic, therefore meaning that the new reform would have no Governor General appointed royally but instead an elected officer. The next argument in the development of the research will discuss the arguments against this institutional reform and why the Governor General’s role is still significant in Canada and why this political actor should still be a part of the Canadian Constitution, since in fact it is part of Canadian history and politics. And then lastly on the development is what my personal opinion is on the matter of having an institution reform or not and then finally finishing off with the conclusion of my paper.…
- 1040 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Since the post war era, the political culture of the majority of the world has been witness to the erosion of materialism of the conflict ridden war era and the emergence of post-materialism that is common with spreading socioeconomic safety. With this change in political culture that permeates all levels of life, from economic to political; the public’s priorities have changed accordingly. More and more people are becoming concerned with self expression and life style rather than personal security and economic survival. This change in public priority can then accordingly transfer to a change in government policy and administration (In a liberal democracy the government consists of representatives of the public). Canada being a liberal democracy and being one of the top ten countries for the prevalence of post-materialism , should be expected to reflect these new post-materialistic values both in public focus and government policy. However some claim that this is not the case in Canada, that despite the rise of post-materialism, and Canadian’s new found focus on civil liberties and group based rights, their interests are not being represented by what is becoming an increasingly undemocratic government . I will attempt to demonstrate that in this modern post-material era, were Canadians are increasingly stressing civil liberties and group rights, government is showing disturbingly undemocratic tendencies and elites are being desensitized to public interest by focusing primarily on party lines and ideology, resultantly there are great political consequences taking place due to electorate reaction to the issue. Understanding this question, its validity and consequences are crucial to today’s political climate and to the future of Canada’s traditions and its future as a nation-state. Are we living in a in a friendly dictatorship, disconnected from the voice of the people and the ideals of our founding principles?…
- 2739 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
The issue of electoral reform has become more important than ever in Canada in recent years as the general public has come to realize that our current first-past-the-post, winner-take-all system, formally known as single-member plurality (SMP) has produced majority governments of questionable legitimacy. Of the major democracies in the world, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom are the only countries that still have SMP systems in place. Interestingly enough, there has been enormous political tension and division in the last few years in these countries, culminating with the election results in Canada and the USA this year that polarized both countries. In the last year we have seen unprecedented progress towards electoral reform, with PEI establishing an electoral reform commissioner and New Brunswick appointing a nine-member Commission on Legislative Democracy in December 2003 to the groundbreaking decision by the British Columbia Citizen's Assembly on October 24, 2004 that the province will have a referendum on May 17, 2005 to decide whether or not they will switch to a system of proportional representation. This kind of reform is only expected to continue, as Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty decided to take BC's lead and form an independent Citizen's Assembly with the power to determine whether or not Ontario will have a referendum regarding a change to a more proportional system. There is still much work to do however, and we will examine the inherent problems with Canada's first-past-the-post system and why we should move into the 21st century and switch to a form of proportional representation.…
- 1909 Words
- 8 Pages
Good Essays -
1. The point in history, physical geography, location, and population profile the scenario for Canadians and Americans was roughly the same and in many ways, this deep similarity remains. But different in important ways, the history of Canada and the United States is quite different. Over 200 years ago, the U.S. became a country after a war of independence with their mother country, Britain. However, Canada never had to fight for independence from Britain; instead, Canada quietly became a country, in 1867, nearly 100 years after the U.S. did. This historical difference has caused and reflects some small, but important cultural differences between the two countries (Stapleton, 2000, Page 2, Para 3). Politically, Canada has a parliamentary democracy, while the U.S. is a republic. This is a very important difference because it reflects feelings about populism. In parliamentary governments, candidates are chosen by their parties and once elected expected to vote with their party on proposed motions. In other words, in some cases they have to suspend their individual opinions and perhaps what they believe best reflects the views of their constituents, in the name of party solidarity. In American politics, candidates are not chosen by their party but by the people during primaries. Then once elected, they are free to go against party lines if they so choose in order to best serve their constituents (Stapleton, 2000, Page 4, Para 2).…
- 836 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Another factor making the political party inferior is its longstanding values, territorial basis restricting it from expansion since political parties aim to accomplish control of legislative. Hence since the legislature is based on a territorial perimeter, the rest of the political party body must follow in this direction. In contrast to some interest groups, political parties have not fully been able to achieve a system which incorporates the public into the policy making process. Pross questioned whether the fragmentation of the political parties endangers long-standing institutions, or if this merely is the politics of the new age. Canada has witnessed the emergence of a new public philosophy “pluralism” started taking the place of the previous representative parliamentary democracy. Pluralism emphasizes the collaboration between government and interest groups. Ideally members of private groups exchange ideas and negotiate with government civil…
- 2390 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Globalization means that Canada is playing an increasingly important role in other countries through foreign policies. Therefore, foreign leaders are providing additional checks and holding the Prime Minister responsible for the decisions they make (Baker, 2014). The media provides important checks and balances to the office of the Prime Minister through dissemination and interpretation of public information besides questioning government decisions. Enshrining public service by the laws and constitution by establishing the office of the Prime Minister reducing the public officers appointed by the Prime Minister will help reduce the powers of the Prime Minister. In addition, the parliament should be empowered through transfer of former Crown powers currently vested in the office of the Prime Minister (Axworthy,…
- 2207 Words
- 9 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In order to be recognised as a new and independent country, such nation must be able to determine what system of government should be used. If the new country will choose the democratic form of government, there are two systems to be chosen. These include parliamentary and the presidential system. The main goal of this paper is to determine the pros and cons of parliamentary and presidential system in a new country.…
- 928 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays