Preview

Absolutism in 17th Century Europe

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Absolutism in 17th Century Europe
Absolutism in Europe changed the role of nobility completely in every country. For example, in France, nobles lost a lot of their power due to Louis XIV and his predecessors; also, in Eastern Europe, rulers such as Frederick William of Prussia changed the status of the nobility with his polices.

In France, starting with Henry IV, the status of nobility started to fall when Henry started the idea of "nobles of the robe" in which middle class citizens could buy nobility from the king. This diluted the nobles, which weakened their power and hurt them considerably. Louis XIII and his son continued this and took more of their power away as well. Cardinal Richelieu started the intendant system, which recruited members of the middle class t watch the nobles and report back to the king. This took away power from the nobles to have less influence in the government of France. Continuing the intendant system, Louis XIV had also built the palace of Versailles and forced the nobles to move in. This caused the nobles to fight for the attention of the king and they focused less on the issues of France. Also, living in the palace of the king, one could always watch the nobles to make sure they weren't planning, for example, an uprising. In conclusion, French kings took steps to ensure absolute power and took away the power of the nobles.

In Eastern Europe, however, the nobility was dealt with in a different way. For example, in Prussia, nobles gave power to Frederick William for a few reasons: one, to stop Swedish and Polish influence; second, to stop the invasion of Tartars from Russia. For this decision, nobles lost political power in Prussia, but in 1653, Frederick William gave them more power in something else, controlling serfs: he allowed a hereditary subjugation of the serfs in order to appease the Junkers, or noble class. While Frederick William was in power, he believed in a strong, standing army. He increased military spending through taxation,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Between the 16th and 18th century, absolute monarchs were the dominant ruling powers in Europe. Catherine II was married to the Grand Duke Peter, who would inherit the Russian throne upon Empress Elizabeth’s death, Catherine II later overthrew her husband and gained access to the throne in 1762, where she ruled Russia during its Golden Age until her death in 1796. Her political views were influenced by her interest in philosophy, during her reign, she brought multiple political reforms to the Russian government. As Russia’s monarch, Catherine II expanded Russia’s borders to include lands surrounding the Black Sea and parts of Poland in three partitions that divided Poland amongst Russia, Austria, and Prussia. Catherine II favored nobles above…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 17th and 18th centuries were a period filled with nation building and expansion across the globe as extensive, and often overseas, holdings became an indicator of a strong and wealthy country in this politically competitive era. However, the extent of a ruler's control was not their only concern. Many monarchs throughout Europe took great initiative to consolidate and increase their power, building absolute monarchies in which they held absolute power. The pursuit of political absolutism frequently stemmed from past conflict involving the various monarchs and included practices such as increasing the authority and control over the nobility, building standing armies, and independently collecting funds, the manner of which were similar between many rulers. An increase in the subjugation and control of nobles is most evident in the reigns of Louis XIV of France as well as…

    • 2606 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The nobles from military decent (the sword) have an extensive lineage that allows them to perform certain tasks as described by Jean de La Taille in the poem “The Retired Courtier,” the words speak of the need to be a noble, to be a pure noble, to hold the position of a courtier [Doc 1]. King Louis XIII has proclaimed in the Declaration of Duels and Affairs of Honor that nobles bought into the nobility are wasting time fighting with the nobles of military decent should rather have spent that energy defending the country that gives them such authority in the first place [Doc 6]. King Louis XIII only wants the political emancipation from such a minor distraction as this controversy caused such a up roar of the masses. Gilles André de La Roque said, “You can’t just earn the title of nobility because you lack the family necessary for it” [Doc 9]. On that note, note everyone had the exact same idea as to what makes a noble, a noble.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Absolutism is the acceptance of, or belief in absolute principles in political, philosophical, ethical, or theological matters. French absolutism started with Louis XIV and Russian absolutism started with Peter the Great. Louis XIV ruled from 1643-1714 and Peter the Great ruled from 1699-1725. In French absolutism, the rule of absolute monarchs was not all embracing because they lacked the financial and military resources, and the technology to make it so. France and Russia are alike in absolutism that they both sought to control religion and that they got the rich out of paying taxes. They are different in that Louis XIV wasn’t successful in wars, but Peter the Great was.…

    • 942 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    During the medieval era, France had a feudal system of governance where the upper nobility siding with the kings controlled the lower classes. The social structure was fragmented into three unequal hierarchical groups consisting Kings, lords and peasants. The kings ruled the land and were believed to have been granted this right by God that they passed on through heredity. They incarnated the law and were the absolute monarchs. The Lords on the other hand hold fiefs that they rented to peasants in exchange of labor, fees and protection. The Lords consider themselves far more superior than the peasants or serfs and treated them unfairly as a result. Lastly the serfs, representing the vast majority of France population, approximately ninety percent, were the most neglected and most abused of all three classes.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Absolute Monarchy was a new concept to the people of France during the 1600’s. Other forms of government were failing from lack of control, so the people of France turned to an Absolute Monarch, named Louis XIV. The only problem with Louis was that he was self-centered, and did not care a whole lot about governing his kingdom. He was more concerned with making himself looking good, and even went as far to call himself the “Sun God.” As a result, the French common people lived very rough lives, due to the neglect of their king. It was not an easy life for the French people under King Louis XIV’s rule, and it was not made better by his view on governing. This is shown through his lack of genuine care for his people, over taxation, and wars of the time.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis Xiv Dbq Analysis

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As noted in documents 4, 5, and 6, peasants suffered immensely from the high taxes that the monarchs put on them. In document 4, the report of the Commission of Enquiry into the Conditions of the Peasants of Bohemia, it states that even good nobles couldn't protect their peasants from the high taxes and all financial burdens are put on the peasants who are the only ones that pay the taxes. In document 5, an excerpt that was written by Arthur Young, talks about the lives of peasants. This section is saying that the nobility that actually have the money to pay the taxes don't even have to pay, but the ones that can't afford the taxes are responsible for the whole country's financial state. In document 6, Adam Olearius states that the common people are living roughly like slaves but they still endure it without much complaint. The subjects are not being protected by the absolute monarch and they still go through life. There is a great difference in the way the absolute monarchs live and how his subjects live. This leads to the different perspectives on the view of being a proper role of an absolute monarch. While the king only sees the expansion of his kingdom, the peasant sees the hardship of the life in the kingdom. The subjects would view that being a proper monarch you should be kind and consider the aspects of the people you rule's…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Experience of France and England in the 17th century demonstrates the intellectual and practical superiority of absolutism over constitutionalism. Absolutism in France was much more secure than Constitutionalism in England. Absolutism controlled all competing interest groups and organized all religious sects. Louis XIV had centralized power and control under his authority in France while Constitutionalism in England failed to create absolute monarchy. Constitutionalism in England dealt with James I, Charles I, and James II that led to a catastrophe.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Politically, important changes, mainly the Glorious Revolution, impacted Europe in such a way that there is a lasting impression to this day. The decline in feudal balance resulted in more centralized government states, therefore leading to absolute and parliamentary monarchies. When France,…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Kings of England and of France constantly attempted to obtain more power for themselves in order to become richer, more influential, and stronger. These kings used many similar and different methods in an attempt to gain more power. However, some factors led to the decline of power in England as opposed to rise of power in France.…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Absolutism has a great power that monarch, monarchy is the type of country that tends to be reported to the awe and respect.…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The upper bourgeoisie had more in common with the nobility, the former’s wealth often lead them to run within the same circles. While the bourgeoisie would resent the nobility for their exclusivity and political power, there was still a sense of aspiration towards them. There were frequent inter-marriages between the two, further complicating the social structure in terms of power. The bourgeoisie grew in power and influence of rising commerce and finance, which somewhat threatened the status of the nobility. As social mobility and moveable wealth expanded, privilege was on the increase and there were more, and perhaps often embittering, divisions in society. While the nobility utilized their easily acquired privileges of office, the bourgeoisie was beginning to feel more self-confident in its own privileges and merits. This amount of tension within the French social classes, along with an Enlightened society conflicting against their Absolute leader Louis XVI, lead to the infamous social and political revolution of 1789. To say that the class struggle between the bourgeoisie and the aristocracy caused the French Revolution would be inaccurate as to dismiss many other contributing factors. However there is no doubt the French Revolution marked a major transitional stage for the rise of the bourgeoisie into modern…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History Turning Points

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Political power in many parts of Europe shifted from nobles to centralized governments, headed by national monarchs.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq on Absolutism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In a rule using suppression, backed up by the claim to divine authority, an absolute monarchy embodies the omnipotent government reign. Such power was given solely to the head of the state without any constituted restraints. During the Reformation up to the seventeenth century, Europe’s social system started to have conflict as to whether absolute power should be appointed to the king. The king’s subjects, mostly nobles, supported their kings right to absolute power because they got the benefit of political leadership roles and were also given royal protection. The common-folk and the servants were against it because absolutism abused the power in ruling over the peasants as the king, which tended to be restricting.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays