Preview

A Few Good Men: Why People Obey Authority

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2032 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
A Few Good Men: Why People Obey Authority
Why People Obey Authority
The movie A Few Good Men was written by Aaron Sorkin. The movie is about a trial concerning two young soldiers, P.F.C. Downey and Lance Cpl. Dawson. These soldiers gave a “code red” to P.F.C. Santiago for breaking the chain of command when asking for a transfer. Lt. Kaffee, their lawyer, tries to prove to the court that they were ordered to give the code red by Col. Jessep. The article “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram. It is about an experiment where subjects were tested to see how far they would go when given orders by authority. The article “Obedience” written by Ian Parker, is about Milgram’s experiment and other variables that played a factor. The article Milgram’s article is about how far
…show more content…
In the movie Dawson and Downey are ordered to give Santiago a code red. In this situation most people would turn down the order to cause pain on someone else but Dawson and Downey do not. They carry out this order and follow orders. What makes things very interesting is the facial expressions that come off of them while they are giving Santiago that code red. There is virtually no expression that comes off of them and Dawson and Downey have a straight face and do not look like they feel bad for this at all. This is backed up when they refuse to take the offer Kaffee gets because they do not feel like they have done anything wrong because they were just following orders. While they did not mean to kill Santiago they excuse it by saying that they were following orders. This is similar to the Milgram experiment where people were shocking other individuals (the actors never received any shocks it was just acting) believing that they were actually causing pain. Most individuals continued on and obeyed the experimenter to shocks upwards of 300+ volts. They did not necessarily want to hurt the man, but they were following orders and that is how they excused it. In this situation the people seemed to express more concern for the person inside, this could be partly due to the different environment in civilian worlds versus military worlds. In both cases people …show more content…
That theory is along the lines of that is how people are raised so they know no better. They assume that someone is in a position of authority for a reason and they will follow the orders handed down even if they conflict with their own moral views in some cases. It could also have to do with the fact that some people just have a deep hatred and anger in them and want to release it and use the cover of authority to do so. This is clearly visible in the movie A Few Good Men. The soldiers are taught to follow orders so they do not question Col. Jessep when he orders them to give a code red to P.F.C. Santiago. In the Milgram experiment it is possible to see how some people may have a deep aggression down inside as some were very willing to take it to the maximum of 450 volts and even continue after the learner went silent. All of these things come together to try to explain why people will follow the orders of authority so

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram's Experiment brings up the point that people under the pressure of other, will more likely obey orders even if it goes against their moral beliefs. In "To Obey of Not to Obey", most of the soldiers obeyed their superiors because they were taught to do so. Similarly in Migram's Experient, the "teachers" obeyed when the experimenter pressured the subject to continue with the shocks. This can be related to Slaughterhouse Five because the German soldiers are under the command of their superiors who are requiring them to take American prisoners. This pressure was passed down from the German soldiers who demanded the American soldiers to clean up the charred remains of dead civilians after the bombing of Dresden.…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Stanley Milgram’s “The Perils of Obedience,” Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that would involve an experimenter, a teacher, and a learner to determine how far obedience would play a role on willing participants. The purpose of Milgram’s experiment is to see how far a willing participant would go based on orders to continue knowing that the orders would result in another person’s pain. The experiment was set up so that two willing participants went into the experiment understanding that they were taking part in a memory and learning exercise. One of the two willing participants played the role as the…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    John Darley’s criticism focuses on how the findings of the obedience experiments are applied to historical or real-world situations. He points out many ways in which the behavior of the obedience subjects in Milgram’s study differs drastically from the behavior of many others who commit atrocities: Nazi doctors or concentration camp executioners, for instance (Darley 133-134). However, since Darley’s criticism focuses on the behavioral differences between the obedience study and historical events, Milgram responds in a strong, convincing way. Referring to the process of comparing laboratory studies with real-world situations, Milgram writes, “The problem of generalizing from one to the other does not consist of point-for-point comparison between one and the other... but depends on whether one has reached a correct theoretical understanding of…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The articles “The Stanford Prison Experiment” written by Philip G. Zimbardo and “The My Lai Massacre: A Military Crime of Obedience” composed by Herbert C. Kelman and V. Lee Hamilton both focus on the effects of power. In which the subjects have been ordered to follow something by superiors. In the experiment the original group of subjects are divided into the role of guards, and inmates. The massacre, however, was not an experiment but was the result of an order issued by a higher ranking official. In comparison the movie A Few Good Men was used. This movie contained the same main underlying concepts as the articles which makes it a good comparison. Involved were two marine who were charged with murder of a fellow marine and the conspiracy…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    draft5 1

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The Perils of Obedience” was an experiment done by Stanley Milgram concentrating on the conflict between obedience to the authority and individual’s self. Milgram created a threatening shock generator with starting level of 30 volts and expanding up to 450 volts. The experiment was set up with having an experimenter, a participant who was the subject, and a confederate pretending to be a volunteer. The teachers were told to ask questions from the learners and every time they gave a wrong answer, an electric shock was given and was increased 15 volt on each wrong answer. As the experiment advanced, the participants heard the learners argue to be discharged and complained about their heart condition.…

    • 1345 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s findings, as read in the article “If Hitler Asked You to Electrocute a Stranger, Would You?”, apply to the first case of a manager and her fiancé ordering a teenage girl to strip and her following their commands. Milgram’s data suggested that humans are obedient even to the extent of blindly following authority. His findings were demonstrated by his experimental subjects who continued to increase the voltage to electrocute the learner, despite the subject’s moral code conflicting with the idea of…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Several minutes later Lieutenant Calley returns and says “How come they aren’t dead?” The soldiers then turn to kill them although some seemed apparently uncomfortable and unwilling to do so. The situation in which the soldiers are left alone with prisoners display a similar behavior as witnessed with Why My Lai 1st semester project 46 the subject in the above mentioned experiment. After leaving the soldiers alone with the orders to “take care of them” they show subtle sympathy towards the gathered prisoners in “sparing” their lives rather than shooting them right away. This of course can be interpreted in the individual soldiers’ sense of moral ethics towards his fellow man, but under the circumstances of this specific, somewhat chaotic and brutal event one could just as much assume they are meant to kill the prisoners instead of simply guarding them. Comparing this situation with the experiment we encounter a slight problem when taking the concept of consequence into consideration. For the participant in the experiment there was no immediate consequence in not being obedient to the experimenter and raising the shock level when required. However, for the soldiers in the mentioned situation, they faced an authority figure which during the massacre was known to be life threatening towards the soldiers if they did not do what was ordered. The results of the experiment and the mentioned example differ as we look closer at a situational perspective; nonetheless we see similarities of the two when looking at the result of the given order in the absence of authority. The soldiers involved in My Lai were all part of an institution larger and more powerful than any of those used in the Milgram…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milgram’s study of obedience (1963), had participants distributed electric shocks from 15 volts to 450 volts to confederates. The findings showed 65% of participants continued up to the maximum voltage of 450 but all participants went up to 300 volts with only 12.5% refusing to continue at the point the confederate first objected. They concluded that ordinary people are extremely obedient to authority even when asked to behave in an inhumane way. This suggests that it is not evil people that commit inhumane crimes but it is ordinary people who are just obeying orders. Taking this into consideration, this experiment suggests and explains why the soldiers obeyed the orders they were given; the behaviour of the perpetrators were the outcome of situation factors rather than dispositional factors.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is clearly shown when the difference in people's malicious behavior when shocking the students in the presence of authority and when given the freedom to choose the level of shock. The thesis of Milgram's essay was that obedience is a deeply ingrained behavior tendency; indeed, a potent impulse overriding reining ethics, sympathy and moral conduct is right on the dot. He also discusses the extreme willingness of man to obey authority at any length. This shows that "ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process." This is proven by the fact that the majority of people were willing to shock students almost to the assumed point of death when instructed to do so by a…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jim Jones Research Paper

    • 3624 Words
    • 15 Pages

    Many theories and questions are raised from the problem of obedience to authority. What can make another person be obedient to another? Why do some people obey others when they know what they’re doing is wrong? This is a problem for the human population and it demands reasoning, explanation, and examination. We must reflect on what many experts have examined in the field, and draw some conclusions. There are many experts that have studied obedience to authority, and why people still obey even though it may be wrong. In the military following orders is the key to your survival. Even if your superior officers tell you to kill someone or shoot someone it may…

    • 3624 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In The Perils of Obedience, Stanley Milgram expresses his findings of an experiment he conducted trying to prove the lengths people will go to be obedient to authority.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Milgram Aims and Context

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Milgram’s study was done after the trial of Adolf Eichmann. This was after the holocaust where 6 million Jews were murdered. This trial displayed an example of destructive obedience where people were said to have complied with what they were told to do, even if it had a negative impact on others, which in this case was murdering innocent people, although being completely mentally aware of what they were being asked to do and yet still carried out the task.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Philip Zimbardo and Stanley Milgram conducted controversial experiments that had to deal with obedience. Zimbardo conducted an experiment in a mock prison that showed the roles of the guards and prisoners. Milgram conducted an experiment that tested how much pain a teacher would inflict on someone else at the command of an experimenter. The experiments that they conducted have been called wrong and unethical. Although the experiments vary from each other, they both changed the way the world looks at obedience and Authority.…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    How do Milgram’s results—particularly the finding that the remoteness of the victim affected the obedience—relate to some aspects of modern warfare?…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He set out to prove that individuals would obey with the request of authority figures. McLeod in his summary states, “Milgram was interested in researching how far people would go in obeying an instruction if it involved harming another person. Stanley Milgram was interested in how easily ordinary people could be influenced into committing atrocities for example, Germans in WWII.” (McLeod, The Milgram Experiment, 2007) The experiment was carried out by asking participants/teachers to deliver a series of electrical shocks to another person when a question was answered incorrectly. Also, if a mistake was made, the teacher could deliver an increased voltage level to the student. The general findings were that individuals who were going to disobey were those who responded not to the learner’s cries of pain but to the learners request to be set free. People are more likely to obey if there is an authority figure there to take the blame. “The power of legitimate, close-at-hand authorities is dramatically apparent in stories of those who complied with orders to carry out the atrocities of the Holocaust, and those who didn’t.” (Social Psychology) Milgram’s experiment further proves that obedience plays a major part in behavior and people are going to do what is necessary to fit…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays