Preview

1967: Aboriginal And Torres Strait Islander People

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
927 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
1967: Aboriginal And Torres Strait Islander People
Why was the 1967 referendum significant in the fight for aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people?
The Australian Referendum of 1967, called by Prime Minister Harold Holt, led to important and influential decisions and legislations; which ultimately bettered the lives of the first Australians. Although the amendments made to the constitution, were minimal and overall didn't immediately amount to much, it was significant in the progression of the mentality of Australian society. One of the most obvious reasons as to why the referendum still resonates with the people today is that it was the first example of national support for Indigenous Australians. It was also the first time Indigenous Australians were counted, in accordance with state
…show more content…
It was the beginning of a social reform and was also the gateway to new rights being gained by the original owners.

The referendum of 1967, is still today the most supported and successful referendum in Australia's history. The Australian Constitution is notorious for being difficult to alter, yet when this change was proposed to the public, 90.77% of Australians voted ‘yes' to amending section 127 and section 51(xxvi) of the constitution, in favour of the Indigenous people. (Ergo, 2016). However it has been suggested that the people didn't necessarily understand what they were voting for in 1967, as the question posed to them, ("An Act to alter the Constitution so as to omit certain words relating to the people of the Aboriginal race in any state and so that Aboriginals are to be counted in reckoning the population?"), was worded in complex

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Jessie Street topic Ideas

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    - Faith Bandler, campaigner for the rights of Aboriginal Torres Strait islander and South Pacific Islander peoples and National living Treasure talking about the prevail role played by Jessie Street in the campaign for the 1967 referendum which amended the Australian constitution to enable Aboriginies to be counted in…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noel Pearson Summary

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In Pearson’s speech, the criticism of John Howard, who was at the time the Prime Minister, throughout the speech shows the idea that the past Australian Governments had made a mistake in treating Aboriginal Australians in the past, and that modern day government is trying to forget that past because of the guilt and shame it had caused the Australian government in the past. Pearson directly quotes comments made by John Howard during a radio interview, but uses these comments to emphasise his own key arguments rather than support those being made by Howard. By using quotes from other sources he broadens the scope of his argument and makes his own argument less of a personal crusade. Pearson also focuses on National Identity and determining “who we are”. Pearson acknowledges the current debate of National Identity by making reference to the “hot button issue” about “the guilt about Australia’s colonial Identity”. The extended metaphor of button pressing and the cliché “You would not need to be a political genius” stresses the “great electoral resonance” of the National Identity debate. Another technique Pearson applies is the use of inclusive language in his speech. This is cleverly woven into the speech by repeated references to “our nation” and the action that “we” have to take to correct the injustices of the past. This facilitates Pearson’s depiction of Aboriginal rights being a social, political, legal and religious concern for the nation as a whole and thus presents Pearson’s view on National Identity and the global perception of “who we are”. The past shows that Australia as a nation…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the back of the recent landslide referendum on the recognition of Aboriginal people in the national census, the Whitlam government greatly increased the social and political rights of first nation Australians. The government instituted a policy of ‘self-determination’ which decentralised decision making powers to indigenous communities. They allowed Aboriginals to claim land and brought more Indigenous voices into the policy making process. From the outset, Whitlam made Indigenous affairs a top priority for his government and indicated that justice had to be served in order for Australia to move forward as a country. The subsequent Fraser Government committed to continue these reforms. A powerful example Whitlam’s loyalty to this issue was in his remarks to an Aboriginal tribe where he declared Indigenous ownership of a Victorian river. Whitlam in his speech to the Gurindji people stated “these lands belong to the Gurindji people and I put into your hands this piece of the earth itself as a sign that we restore them to you and your children…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1967 Referendum was an extremely momentous event for Indigenous Australians; it signified that legal discrimination towards Aborigines would end soon, and promised full and equal citizenship to them. The Referendum not only affected their rights and freedoms, but also indicated that the nation was prepared to embrace Indigenous people as a part of their society and culture.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This essay focuses on how Aboriginal lives varied after the 1970s by arguing that the government played a significant role when achieving better qualities of Aboriginal lives nowadays. The government considers indigenous affairs as national priority and implements Indigenous Advancement Strategy which consolidates beneficial programmes targeting Aboriginals. I argue they do this to promote cultural diversity in Australia.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Secondly, Larissa Behrendt, is another Aboriginal activist who acknowledges that the ‘dissent’ amongst Indigenous people is largely because there is still uncertainty in the community regarding the referendum. This also makes Maddison’s assumption that the recognise campaign is a hindrance to constitutional change clear. Running the campaign before a reform to the constitution was proposed meant that Indigenous and Torres Strait Islander people could not communicate with the government properly and have no participation in debates. Similarly, the article…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Australia’s attitude towards the rights and freedoms of Aboriginals has changed drastically from 1920 to the present. It is evident that Australia has made a greater effort throughout the years, to bridge the gap between the rights and of Aboriginals and the rest of Australia. This has been improved by the implementation of different policies such as the Protection policy, Assimilation, Integration, Self Determination and Reconciliation.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Mabo Decision

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since 1918, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders (ATSI) have achieved a great deal of change in both political and social ways, though it was not without struggle. Many of these achievements are derived from several events, such as the Mabo Decision which was the long battle that lead to the recognition of Aboriginal land rights. Other events also contributed, such as the long process of reconciling the relationships between ATSI peoples and Australians, the Bringing Them Home Report which helped lead to the Apology. All of these events are important in Aboriginal culture as they all inspired change in the Australian community.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the 6th of November 1999 Australia was very close to becoming a republic. There was a 4% difference in the vote for the referendum with 46% of voters in favour for Australia to become a republic and 54% of voters against becoming a republic winning by the smallest margin. But why become a republic?…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Pearson’s speech was delivered at an academic gathering, Bandler had a more mixed audience including mainly Indigenous peoples and politicians, both supporting and opposing additional rights for aboriginal people. Pearson’s and Bandler’s speeches were both written in the 1990s, a contentious and heated time in relation ind issues. Pearson’s speech, in particular, was a response to the changing attitudes of the newly elected Howard government in 1996, who took the view that present day Australians shouldn’t feel responsible for the past injustices done to the aborigines- a different view from the previous Keating government. Bandler’s speech was a response to the entire Australian population’s inability to accept the guilt of the past, which she felt was hindering the progress of reconciliation between Aborigines and Europeans. Both Pearson, a high profile indigenous activist, and Bandler, a highly respected civil rights activist, gave their speeches in an attempt to take a step forward in the quest to conquer the differences between aborigines and other Australians and explore the ways the country as a whole could move forward from the horrible past.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The 1967 referendum is about the aboriginals trying to be counted in Australias census. They are trying to change their rights and freedom. The aboriginals were treated unfairly during this time and was discriminated against. There are many aspects to the referendum including the lead up to it, the context on which it was presented, the referendum and finally the impact it has on the aboriginals.…

    • 736 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The treatment of Indigenous Australians by the government has been an issue of controversy since White Europeans settled in Australia. Throughout history Aboriginals have developed and hosted many protests, sometimes with the help of the White Europeans that wanted to make a difference to get back rights and freedoms of Aboriginals.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be able to pass laws and money onto Aboriginal Australians the constitution had to be changed. Therefore a referendum had to take place over two issues;…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To maintain the traditions and culture of the Indigenous Australians, they need to be able to have the strong connection to the land that is such an integral part of who they are as a people. The Aboriginal Land Rights legislation is a positive step forwards in this way. Also, socially there needs to be more recognition in the white Australian community of the damage that was done in past generations and there needs to be more respect for the land's original owners. As more responsibility is…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beginning in 1910 and ending in the 1970s, Australians Federal and State government agencies and church missions made a policy to forcibly take many aboriginal and Torres Strait children away from their families in an attempt to destroy the Aboriginal race and culture. There was an impact on the aboriginals with a particular policy the Australian Government had introduced, which was the policy of ‘Assimilation’. This policy was to encourage many Aboriginal people to give up their culture, language, tradition, knowledge and spirituality to basically become white Australians. Unfortunately this policy didn’t give the Aboriginals the same rights as white Australians, as a result of discrimination, aboriginals were moved to live in special housing…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays