Federal court The Federal Court is the highest judicial authority in the country. It was established pursuant to Article 121(2) of the Federal Constitution. Its decision binds all the courts below. The Federal Court hears appeals from the Court of Appeal. Leave to appeal must always be obtained prior to proceeding with the appeal. The Federal Court is headed by the Chief Justice. According to Article 122(1) of the Federal Constitution‚ the Federal Court shall consist of the Chief Justice‚ the President
Premium Judge Jurisdiction Appeal
Moreover‚ the United States court system is composed of a litigation process that allows the person in accusation to deliver their case in an unbiased manner. In America each state has its own court system. As a part of this system the offender is innocent until proven guilty. They also have the right to plea-bargain and a quick jury trial. The courts are the foremost authority where verdicts are made and where the defense attorney‚ prosecuting attorney‚ and judge advocate gather (Stevenson‚ 1966
Premium Law Jury Criminal law
Is the Court System Fair? Lynette Price CJA-224 9/03/2012 Professor John Pierce Throughout generations‚ the public joke of how attorneys are like sharks‚ they “circle around their prey before they head in for the kill” has been proven through ruthlessness and relentlessness to acquire and win a court case‚ especially if the possible case is high-profile (a Hollywood star‚ a nationally known football player‚ singer‚ a television show icon and etc.) The stigma of working in one of the top
Premium Judge Lawyer Law
law. It is now known as the Butler Act. Scopes was a twenty four year old teacher at Rhea County High School in Dayton. He was described as a modest‚ friendly‚ helpful‚ and shy. There is a discrepancy as to why he agreed to participate in this trial. When Scopes agreed‚ he told how he had taught from Hunter’s Civic Biology‚ the Tennessee approved textbook that contained a chapter on the evolution of man and Darwin’s theory of natural selection. He also admitted that every other teacher taught
Premium Scopes Trial
Document Essay NUREMBERG TRIALS My primary source document is the United States of America opening introduction during the Nuremberg Trials. Their introduction is stated in the first paragraph of the document. In April 1945‚ two weeks after President Roosevelt’s death‚ Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson was chosen to be the chief prosecutor for the United States at Nuremberg war-crimes trial‚ that was held in Europe soon after the World War II had ended. The Nuremberg Trials is the general name
Premium Franklin D. Roosevelt Nazi Germany Adolf Hitler
On June 10th‚ I had the opportunity to go to the SF Immigration court on Montgomery Street with a few of my colleagues. I expected the court to be in a standalone building but instead it was spread over two floors in a twenty-five-floor building. The security checks for entering into the court were moderate. Everyone trying to enter the court had to go through a general security check where they walk through a metal detector machine and have their bags go through the x-ray machine. Before we went
Premium Law Judge Jury
The Salem Witchcraft Trials and The Nuremberg Trials are two alike yet very different trials. The Salem Witchcraft Trials is about the trials of people who were accused to be witches. The Nuremberg Trials is about the trials of the men charge of the Nazi Germany army and the killing of inconcent men‚ women and children. The two trials are alike because they both have to do protecting the public and doing good for the public. They are diffrent because Salem Witchcraft Trials Trials is about witches that
Premium Salem witch trials Witchcraft Salem, Massachusetts
The Nuremburg Trials The Holocaust was an unparalleled crime composed of millions of murders imprisonment‚ racism‚ and destruction. It destroyed millions of lives and wiped out over six million Jews during the course of World War II under Hitler’s power. The aftermath of these horrific events proved to be a difficult one since no form of punishment could ever suffice to the torture and pain the Nazi’s inflicted on the Jewish Community. This challenge was attempted by the International
Premium Nuremberg Trials Nazi Germany
At first‚ during the trial‚ I felt weird because no matter where I looked there was a person I and I didn’t want to stare too long or else they would think I was looking at them when in fact I was thinking about what the defense/prosecution were talking about and how I was to respond when there was an objection. As well‚ while Prosecutor M.Warren was argueing/badgering the witness‚ I was waiting for one of the defensive lawyers to object. They did object‚ but by the time they did the prosecutor was
Premium Law Jury Crime
Local gacaca trials offers these benefits of a more personal setting within the community in which the atrocity took place‚ and this has further benefits – increased unity and reconciliation. Seeing as how the gacaca form of justice aims to reintegrate the defendant back into society to become a productive and contributive member‚ it makes sense that the trials are held within the community – so that the victim and perpetrator can be in the same space and have justice be served while also allowing
Premium Jury Law Human rights