Problem Questions ------------------------------------------------- Question 1 Based on the question‚ the issue in the question is will there be a contract of sale of goods act 1895(SA) under s 1? Hence‚ the law is s 1 where a contract of goods is a contract whereby the seller transfers or agrees to transfer the property the goods to the buyer for a money consideration based on the case Toby Construction Products Pty Ltd v Computer Bar Sales Pty Ltd. The application is under s1 sale of goods
Premium Contract Tort Law
according to the textbook as an intentional tort against persons but could be put into intentional tort against property. Torts against persons are intentional acts that harm an individual’s physical or mental integrity (Kubasek‚ pg. 111). A person who is legally injured may be able to use tort law to recover damages from someone who is legally responsible‚ or “liable‚” for those injuries. According to the case‚ Prudence’s physical integrity was harmed
Premium Abuse Child abuse Bullying
The aim of tort law is to compensate the claimant and to deter defendants’ discuss whether the rules of causation and remoteness of damage fulfil this aim. The rules of causation state that the claimant has to prove that the defendants breach of duty was the factual cause of material damage‚ when considering the facts of Barnett v Chelsea & Kensington Hospital Management Committee (CKHMC) where the claimants husband became ill after drinking tea which had arsenic‚ when taken to hospital‚ the doctor
Premium Tort law Tort Law
In this case‚ Nona was approached by Samseng on her way home after work. Samseng then threatened by pointed a gun onto her head and asked Nona to surrender her money. In order to take legal action against Samseng under assault‚ the issue must first be fulfilled the elements of assault. The first element of assault is the mental state of the defendant. In this case‚ the defendant has the intention to commit the assault on Nona. The intention of the defendant is specific as when the defendant acted
Premium Legal terms Violence Assault
Civil wrongs - torts PowerPoint 1 Torts • Civil wrong other than a breach of contract • Causes personal injury‚ property damage or financial loss • Innocent party usually claims damages • Purpose - justice to be achieved by transferring kiss I’m the victim to wrongdoer • Principle - each citizen should take responsibility for consequences of his/her actions Types of civil wrongs (torts)? • Compensation is the chief remedy sought • Nuisance‚ defamation
Premium Tort
Final Exam For English II World Literature Fall 2014 Directions: Type on your tablet or write on your own sheet of paper EITHER COMPLETE PART ONE WRITING PROMPT AND EXPLAIN THE SIGNIFIGANCE OF 5 QUOTATIONS FROM PART TWO… OR ONLY DO PART TWO BUT EXPLAIN ALL 10 QUOTATIONS PART I.) ACT Style Writing Prompt: ( 30 points) Follow the rules we discussed in class for completing. Educators debate extending high school to five years because of increasing demands on students from employers and colleges
Free High school Education Extracurricular activity
What kind of liability do you think Ton should bear in Scenario 1? Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability Contrast liability in tort with contractual liability. There are three differences between liability and contractual liability: A. The difference of base. Contractual liability means that due to the breach of duty‚ contractual collateral obligation of contract or violates the "contract law" provisions of the obligations. Finding out a contractual liability has to be in terms
Premium Tort Tort law
Assignment 1 Constitutional Law (LAW437) Question Habeas Corpus is a remedy to secure personal liberty in Malaysia. Discuss with reference to some decided cases. 1.1 INTRODUCTION The main provision of the Constitution which is relevant is Art. 5(1):”No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty save in accordance with law.” This most fundamental of all fundamental-rights provisions is given to all persons‚ not just citizens. Art. 5 goes on to provide for the right to habeas
Premium Law Human rights Common law
PART 2: AGREEMENT A. Offer and acceptance Offer * Objective approach: offer must normally be interpreted in the sense in which it would reasonably be understood by an ordinary person‚ even though the offeror’s actual meaning was otherwise. * Definition: indication by one person to another of his or her willingness to enter into a contract with that person on certain terms. The ‘offer’ must indicate a willingness by the offeror to be bound without further negotiation as to the terms of
Premium Contract
Globali | Test | Final Exam | Started | 9/14/12 7:22 PM | Submitted | 9/14/12 8:45 PM | Status | Completed | Score | 260 out of 300 points | Time Elapsed | 1 hour‚ 22 minutes out of 2 hours. | Instructions | This final exam consist of 30 multiple choice questions and covers the material in chapters 8 through 17. There are three questions from each chapter and the questions are in chapter order. Be sure you are in the correct Chapter when you take the exam. | * Question
Premium Transaction cost Net present value Contract