The Tennessee Valley Authority Introduction The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was the first large regional planning agency created by the United States Government in May of 1933. The TVA was one of the most innovative and significant ideas of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt to help tackle the economic‚ social‚ and political problems in the Tennessee Valley‚ a region with no economic growth and was heavily impacted before and after the Great Depression. The TVA is a federally owned
Free Franklin D. Roosevelt Great Depression New Deal
Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority Based on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 employers are not allowed to discriminate against a potential employee based on race‚ color‚ sex‚ religion‚ or national origin. In the Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority case this title of the civil rights act was violated. An African American man named David Dunlap who gave almost the exact same answers as white candidates who got the job and who had 20 years of experience in boiler making was not chosen
Free Employment Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Discrimination
Tennessee Valley Authority Act of 1933 Written by: Brenno Damota Government Period 3 Tennessee Valley Authority Act How it Began... Signed by President Roosevelt on May 18‚1993.‚ it was created as a federal corporation to provide assistance in navigation‚ flood control‚ electricity generation‚ fertilizer manufacturing‚ and economic development in the Tennessee valley region right after the Great Depression. Not only did it tackle important problems like the ones listed above
Premium Tennessee Dam United States
Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority Joyce Harrison Business Employment Law May 11‚ 2011 1. What were the legal issues in this case? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit was to determine if the plaintiff‚ David Dunlap Dunlap‚ had met the burden of proof that the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) was liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by intentionally discriminating against him under both disparate impact and disparate treatment analyses and whether
Premium Racism Appeal Prima facie
case is about David Dunlap the plaintiff who has been faced with discrimination on the basis of race in the interview at Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) during the employment process of this company. Mr. Dunlap is an African American man whom has worked for many years as foreman through contract for the union. He has worked as a contractor with the union at Tennessee Authority as a boiler man for over twenty years including fifteen years as a foreman. He has applied for employment at TVA numerous
Premium Discrimination Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Racism
The TVA aimed to enhance the well-being of the southern region by promoting reforestation‚ improving waterways‚ managing floods‚ and providing affordable electricity in the Tennessee Basin. Right-wing critics raised concerns‚ likening the TVA to socialism‚ fueled by the Red Scare fears of the time. The TVA’s initiatives led to community displacements and heightened tensions between private businesses and local governments. Similar
Premium
Assignment #2 Dunlap v. Tennessee Valley Authority Dr. Edward Sherbert HRM 510 May 5‚ 2013 What where the legal issues in this case? The Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects individuals against employment discrimination on the bases of color‚ as well as national origin‚ sex‚ religion. This law applies to any employers with 15 or more employees including the local state‚ government‚ employment agencies‚ labor organizations and federal government jobs.
Premium United States Law Civil and political rights
The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) enabled the federal government to build dams to control flooding along the Tennessee River. The TVA was created with the hope of modernizing and organizing natural resources and energy in parts of Tennessee‚ Alabama‚ Georgia‚ Kentucky‚ Mississippi‚ North Carolina and Virginia. It produced inexpensive hydroelectric power for the people in
Premium New Deal Franklin D. Roosevelt Great Depression
ASSIGNMENT – BMLW5103 MAY SEMESTER 2013 BMLW 5103- BUSINESS LAW ASSIGNMENT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the students understanding in the element which effect free consent in a contract‚ the issues of repossession under a hire purchase agreement and the formation and dissolution of a partnership. INSTRUCTIONS: Students have to discuss all the questions and justify their answer with correct provisions under respective statutes and relevant precedents. QUESTION 1: a) “In simple language
Premium Contract Contract law Contractual term
THIS SHARE PURCHASE AGREEMENT is entered into on this [●] day of [March]‚ 2008 at [Mumbai / New Delhi] AMONGST 1) ______________ an individual‚ residing at _____________(hereinafter referred to as a “Seller No. 1” which expression shall‚ unless repugnant to the context thereof‚ means and includes his legal heirs‚ executors‚ administrators‚ and permitted assigns) of the FIRST PART; AND (2) _________ having its principal place of business at _______052‚ (hereinafter referred to as a
Premium Stock Sales Warranty