Let’s look at a few cons of the Patriot Act. "Under the Patriot Act‚ law enforcement officials may have broad access to any record — academic‚ library‚ financial and medical — without probable cause of a crime. The Patriot Act prohibits the holder of such information‚ like university librarians‚ from disclosing that they have produced such records‚ under the threat of imprisonment. A University of Illinois survey of U.S. public libraries found that at least 545 libraries have been asked
Premium Federal Bureau of Investigation USA PATRIOT Act Democratic Party
United States on September 11‚ 2001‚ many Americans were fearful of what the future held. Enacted as a response to those attacks‚ and as a way to re-instill a sense of security to the nation‚ American legislators worked to pass the USA Patriot Act of 2001. The Patriot Act appropriately made changes to other U.S. laws to combat terrorism‚ however it also established measures that may potentially hinder the rights of those it was designed to protect‚ sparking controversy regarding privacy and governmental
Premium USA PATRIOT Act Federal Bureau of Investigation United States Constitution
watched as my father‚ along with several other men dressed as Indians‚ threw barrels and barrels of tea shipped from the East India Company into the waters of the harbor.5 It was this event that made me determined‚ like my father‚ to remain true as a patriot and take a stance against the imperial government. This night was just the beginning of the political‚ economical‚ and social issues that I witnessed throughout the next two decades. Even with the odds stacked against me‚ I enlisted in the
Premium United States American Revolutionary War American Revolution
“I believe the Patriot Act strikes the right balance needed to protect our freedom and security” (Bill Owens). This Act makes it easier for the government to identify terrorist. It strengthens our national security and lessens terrorism. It also allowed information to be shared between government officials. The Patriot Act is needed to identify terrorist‚ unite government officials and strengthen the national security of the United States of America. Public safety is much more important than our
Premium Federal Bureau of Investigation United States Terrorism
Should Congress have enacted the patriot act to combat terrorism and protect citizens after 9/11/2001‚ or was it an extreme measure of legislation that violated our civil liberties? As a patriotic citizen‚ I feel as though sacrifices are necessary when large-scale devastation occurs. So‚ yes‚ they should have enacted the patriot act which allowed them to invade our privacy and impose unusual treatment of suspected terrorists at that time. Furthermore‚ as long as ISIS is a threat they should use
Premium Terrorism Federal Bureau of Investigation United States
own soil. So‚ congress passed a law known as the U.S.A Patriot Act. U.S A Patriot is a 10 letter acronym for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. This allowed the N.S.A (national security agency) to gain information of individual citizens or groups of individuals by using library records‚ phone calls and other surveillance. Recently‚ on January 1st of 2015 the Patriot Act has expired. Many members of government are stuck in
Premium United States Terrorism United States Constitution
the violation of human rights. Several think that it’s just only the Terrorists‚ but those who are punishing them are as well. Even though The Patriot Act allows for certain kinds of punishments‚ the War on Terror is contributing to the growing abuse of human rights because a specific group is being targeted and human rights are violated. The Patriot Act allows for certain kinds of punishment In fact‚ every country has its own set of rules on
Premium Human rights Federal Bureau of Investigation September 11 attacks
The Patriot Act vs. Civil Rights The Patriot Act clearly violates the constitutional rights of those living directly under it. There are many reports of United States citizen’s civil rights being violated. Phone conversations being listened in on when no terrorist conversations were taking place. Private medical records being looked at‚ personal computers being tapped into and web site visits being checked and arrests taking place with no solid proof that any crime took place. The accused weren’t
Premium United States Constitution Law
Electronic surveillance has changed in many ways since the passing of the USA Patriot Act. Therefore‚ electronic surveillance can be divided into 4 categories; wiretaps‚ tracking devices‚ stored communications and subscriber information‚ and pen registers and trap devices (Hall‚ D. 2105). Before the Patriot Act‚ you would have to have to show very high need to get a warrant for wiretapping‚ kind of like getting a super warrant and this was due to The Wiretap Act and the Title III of the Omnibus
Premium Crime Police Federal Bureau of Investigation
attacks‚ with virtually no debate‚ Congress passed the USA Patriot Act on October 5th‚ 2001. This act expanded the surveillance powers of domestic law enforcement and international intelligence agencies. The controversy that must be discussed is whether or not this legislation fully or in part has violated the Constitution and/or endangered our civil liberties in any way. John Kerry former presidential candidate is opposed to the patriot act stating "We are a nation of laws and liberties‚ not of
Premium George W. Bush Federal Bureau of Investigation Democratic Party