DIRECTIVE PRINCIPLES AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS Fundamental Rights and Directive Principle are integral components of the same organic constitutional system and no conflict between them could have been intended by founding fathers. But the view of Supreme Court on the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles have not been uniform throughout. There are three possible views on the relationship between Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles. The first view is that former are
Premium United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
INDEX CONTENTS Page No. Introduction 1 Issues Raised 1 Rules Applicable 5 Analysis 8 Conclusion 10 Bibliography 11 N. Nageshwar Rao & Co. v. State of A.P 1994 (6) SCC 205 Introduction India is a Union of States and is governed by a written constitution. Rights being immunities denote that there is a guarantee that certain things cannot or ought not to be done to a person against his will. According to this concept‚ human beings‚ by virtue of their humanity‚ ought to
Premium Constitution of India Law Government of India
THOMPSON v. WESTERN STATES MEDICAL CENTER No.01-344.Argued February26‚ 2002—Decided April 29‚ 2002 NATURE OF CASE: Review of the restrictions on commercial free speech in relation to the advertisement of specified compounded drugs. PROCEDURAL HISTORY: Section 503A of the Food‚ Drug and Cosmetic Act‚ 21 U.S.C. § 353a exempts compounded drugs from certain provisions of the Food and Drug Administration’s standard approval requirements; provided that the distributors abide by certain restrictions
Premium First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States Federal government of the United States
In 1968‚ Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television‚ Inc.‚ 392 U. S. 390‚ the Court determined that a CATV provider was more like a viewer than a broadcaster‚ because its system “no more than enhances the viewer’s capacity to receive the broadcaster’s sig¬nals by providing a well-located antenna with an efficient connec¬tion to the viewer’s television set.” Therefore‚ the Supreme Court held that a CATV provider does not violate the exclusive right of the copyright holder and hence did not perform
Premium Supreme Court of the United States Law United States
Constitution and the System of the State of Kansas Brittany Torain POL215 May 5‚ 2015 Janice Harder Constitution and the System of the State of Kansas The Constitution of the State of Kansas is the playbook of how we are allowed to play the game of government. This playbook‚ which is our Constitution‚ will have limitations on the players. The Constitution describes how each player will interact‚ and who has power during specific situations. The Constitution of the State of Kansas was written in 1859
Premium Separation of powers Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution
Man Vs State: Profanity? Introducing two opposing forces‚ a Michigan man and the state of Michigan in a battle of upholding civil rights and a case of profanity. Stephanie Simon‚ author of the article‚ “Michigan Man Swears by His right to Use Profanity‚” goes to on to discuss a case of man versus state. Simon writes for civil rights advocates explaining the two sides of the case involved with Timothy Boomer and Standish‚ Michigan. She included a casual tone within her work that was relatable and
Premium Law First Amendment to the United States Constitution Supreme Court of the United States
4.1.1. United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples The United Nations General Assembly adopted the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples at its 62nd session in September 2007. (UN Portal) It is not a legally binding instrument but represents a very important political step towards a binding recognition of the rights of indigenous peoples. The declaration explicitly guarantees indigenous peoples - as collectives but also for individual members - a right to the enjoyment
Premium United States United Nations Human rights
West Bengal: The Genocidal State under CPI-M Rule Tt was reported in the print media that under the CPI-M rule of the last 34 years in this State (West Bengal) 34 events of mass murder were organised either directly by the police resorting to wanton firing on the crowds consisting of Opposition party members or by the armed “harmads” of the CPI-M to seek political revenge or to establish political control over the areas lost to the Opposition party through elections. In the latter incidents the
Premium Police West Bengal Constable
Religious homophobia and state-sponsored homophobia‚ and internalized homophobia‚ experienced by people who have same-sex attractions‚ regardless of how they identify. For example‚ a gay Chinese Malaysian pastor who married his musical producer boyfriend in New York last year has fulfilled a vow to hold a wedding banquet in his native Malaysia in what they believe is the first such event in the Muslim-majority country. Cbcnews-An openly gay and atheist University of Winnipeg student‚ Hazim Ismail
Premium Marriage Homosexuality Family
COMPARISM BETWEEN LAGOS STATE TENANCY LAW AND CANADA TENACY LAW In Lagos State -(1) It shall be unlawful for a landlord or his agent to demand or receive from a sitting tenant rent in excess of six (6) months from a monthly tenant and one (1) year from a yearly tenant in respect of any premises without prejudice to the nature of tenancy held at the commencement of the tenancy. (2) It shall be unlawful for a sitting tenant to offer or pay rent in
Premium Renting Leasehold estate Lease