"Realistic Broadcast Protocol Handler (RBPH) is a reliable multicast transport protocol mainly aimed for applications that require ordered‚ duplicate-free‚ multicast data delivery from multiple sources to multiple receivers. The advantage of RBPH over traditional multicast protocols is that it guarantees that a receiver in the group either receives all data packets from transmissions and retransmissions‚ or is able to detect unrecoverable data packet loss. RBPH is specifically intended as a workable
Premium Internet Protocol Transmission Control Protocol User Datagram Protocol
knowledge about the concepts and techniques which they have studied from 2nd to 6th semester. The project “Designing a campus network” will help a student to practice the concepts such as configuring a switch‚ a router configuration (generic)‚ routing protocol specific router configuration and also in creating a secured campus Network‚ The project course titled “Project: Designing a Campus Network” bearing the subject code BNT604 is of 8 credits weightage. The project has to be completed in duration
Premium IP address Routing Computer network
multidimensional warehouse for comparing many aspects in WSN such as (routing protocol[4]‚ sensor‚ sensor mobility‚ cluster ….). Hence‚ data warehouse defined and applied to the context above is presented as a useful approach that gives specialists row data and information for decision processes and navigate from one aspect to another. KEYWORDS Network Protocols‚ WSN‚ Data Warehouse‚ multidimensional design‚ OLAP‚ Routing Protocol 1. INTRODUCTION As known‚ the demand for smart phones and portable
Premium Routing Wireless sensor network Routing protocol
Spatial Reuse Protocol behaves quite like the Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) does in a Packet Over SONET (POS) environment. PPP acts as an abstraction layer between a higher level layer 2 technologies such as POS and a layer 1 technology such as SONET/SDH. Layer 1 and high level layer 2 protocols cannot interact directly without having an intermediate low level layer 2 protocol‚ in the case of DPT the layer 2 protocol is SRP. Existing work presented Cooperative Opportunistic Routing in MANET (CORMAN)
Premium Computer network Routing Computer networking
UNIT 5 ASSIGNMENT 1 EIGRP versus OSPF Jason Houlden Table of a side by side comparison: EIGRP OSPF EIGRP forms adjacencies and exchanges routing updates with neighbors OSPF forms adjacencies with DR/BDROSPF can be more efficient than EIGRP for large meshed networks EIGRP uses metric based on bandwidth and delay OSPF uses interface cost (inversely proportional to bandwidth)EIGRP may provide more flexibility in selecting best path EIGRP by default limits usage to at most 50% of link bandwidth in worst
Premium Routing Routing protocol IP address
Project Report (Project Semester January - June 2014) On OSPF vs EIGRP ROUTING SUBMITTED BY PARSHANT VATS STUDENT ROLL NO. 1185746
Premium Computer network Routing Routing protocol
well with people including cross-cultural backgrounds. EXPERIENCE SUMMARY 1+ year experience in IT that includes Network Design‚ Implementation support‚ Network Management System. Hands on experience in deploying routing protocols like RIP‚ OSPF & EIGRP. Familiar with Layer 3 CISCO catalyst 4507R‚ 3750G series And Layer 2 CISCO catalyst SG-300‚ 2950‚ 2960-S series. Configuration and Maintenance of Navlin-Lookout Firewall & CISCO PIX 525 with ACLs‚ NAT & PAT. Terrfic exposure
Premium Routing protocol Windows Server 2008 Routing
Top-Down Network Design Third Edition Priscilla Oppenheimer Priscilla Oppenheimer Cisco Press 800 East 96th Street Indianapolis‚ IN 46240 ii Top-Down Network Design Top-Down Network Design‚ Third Edition Priscilla Oppenheimer Copyright© 2011 Cisco Systems‚ Inc. Published by: Cisco Press 800 East 96th Street Indianapolis‚ IN 46240 USA All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means‚ electronic or mechanical‚ including photocopying
Premium Routing protocol Computer network Routing
CareerCert.info Chapter 1: Planning for Complex Networks............4 Chapter 2: EIGRP ......................................................18 Chapter 3: OSPF .......................................................40 Chapter 4: Optimizing Routing................................61 CCNP ROUTE 642-902 Quick Reference Chapter 5: Path Control ...........................................76 Chapter 6: BGP and Internet Connectivity............83 Chapter 7: Branch Office Connectivity ..
Premium Routing Routing protocol
following 3 questions as per assignment; QUESTION 1 – What are the three primary differences between Cisco layer 2 network resiliency and HP IRF resiliency? The first obvious difference is the protocols that they use. Cisco uses Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) while HP IRF uses the Link Aggregation Control Protocol. The second difference lies in the architecture being used. Cisco uses a mesh of network switches‚ linked to other switches in the aggregation layer‚ which in turn is linked to the core. This
Premium Ethernet