the time of the original shares and the cost of the original shares will be spread over all the shares. See s.130-20 Seminar reflection Value-shifting is a result of a transaction between two parties that is not at market value‚ the value of an equity or loan interest is increased
Premium Lease Trust law Stock market
| Contents | Page No: | 1. | List of Authorites (Cases & Statutes) | 2 | 2. | Answers (Mainbody & Conclusion) | 3-10 | List of Authorities: Cases : 1. Crabb v Arun 2. Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Tress House Ltd 3. Ramsden v Ryson 4. Willmott v Barber 5. Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Victoria Trustees Co. Ltd 6. Matharu v Matharu 7. Taylors Fashions Ltd v Liverpool Trustees Co 8. Gillet v Holt 9. Dillwyn v Llewellyn
Premium Property Common law Real property
Now we turn to discuss the case study. I hope everyone have already done it. The main issue of the case study is that Chu has been the New South Wales (NSW) Operations Manager for Computers Pty Ltd. Due to Chu’s senior position knows the identity and requirements of the company’s major clients. In March 2007‚ Chu decides to retire and agrees to not compete against the company in NSW for two years. However in April 2007‚ Systems Pty Ltd actively solicits business from the customers of Computers Pty
Premium Corporation Subsidiary Contract
Elizabeth Covington‚ who was sixty-five years old when her husband died‚ needed as much money as she could muster‚ decided to have a garage sale. Her husband had a baseball card collection but Elizabeth knew nothing about baseball or baseball cards. She displayed the cards along with many other items. Michael Ferrell‚ and eighteen year old‚ who lived in the neighborhood‚ attended the sale. What caught his eye was the baseball card collection and‚ specifically what appeared to be a 1952 Topps Mickey
Premium Baseball
functions. Even a lay person will be able to guess what these two functions are. Contract law is conceptualised‚ codified and enforced primarily for two reasons: Ensuring that contracts are formed legally and in keeping with the principles of justice‚ equity and good conscience; and specifying remedies for an injured party if the other performs a breach of the contract. The subject under discussion. The subject of this paper is extremely broad - it is supposed to deal with breach of contract and specific
Premium Contract law Contract Breach of contract
Describe the remedies available for breach of contract When signing a contract not only are you agreeing to the terms of this contract you are agreeing to the consequences if breach the contract. There are many remedies available if one of the party’s breaches the contract and if the party who breached the contract doesn’t agree to the consequences then the matter will be taken to court. A breach of contract can be defined as a party failing to perform‚ precisely and exactly‚ his obligations under
Premium Contract Judicial remedies Injunction
stated‚ “it is impossible to define‚ and difficult even to describe‚ at what point at which the influence becomes‚ in the eye of law‚ undue.” The doctrine of undue influence has been agreed upon as “the ground of relief developed by the courts of equity as a court of conscience.” It is an ordinary behaviour to influence individuals and persuade them to enter into transactions. However‚ the aim is to ensure that the influence exercised is not abused. On the grounds of these concepts‚ it is impossible
Premium Common law Contract
(Bharti)‚ Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL)‚ Hutchinson-Essar limited (Hutch)‚ Idea Cellular limited (Idea) and Reliance India Mobile (RIM)‚ and Tata Indicom. AIRTEL Airtel comes to you from Bharti Tele-Ventures Limited - a part of the biggest private integrated telecom conglomerate‚ Bharti Enterprises. A consortium of giants in the telecommunication business. In its six years of pursuit of greater customer satisfaction‚ Airtel has redefined the business through marketing innovations‚ continuous
Premium Mobile phone companies of India Kolkata Bharti Airtel
Legal Issues Question One- (319 words) The contract at the centre of Bridgewater v Leahy [1998] HCA 66 is a deed of forgiveness of debt‚ in relation to the transfer of land. The parties to this contract were Neil York‚ who bought the interest in the land‚ and Bill York who sold the interest‚ and forgave the debt. The contract was entered into on 19th July 1988‚ with the terms being that Bill would transfer his interests in the Wonga Park fee simple‚ the Wonga Park perpetual lease selection
Premium Contract law Contract Common law
Section 2. The Intellectual Property Paradigm in Satellite Private Spatial Data Commerce. I. Intellectual property and satellite imagery and data commercial relations. A paradigm shift? Conceiving satellite companies as “the authors of an image” or “the data creators” could be an important paradigm to debate about. Despite it is not the object of the present thesis to understand the moral authorship of an intangible asset‚ it is undeniable that there is an entity holding rights of an intangible
Premium Internet Cloud computing Marketing