State under a Machiavellian Ruler vs. Utopian State By Donald Collett A Machiavellian society is ruled by a princedom in which peasants worked most of the occupations. Nobles did not perform any physical labor. And the military is strong and follows the prince. In a Utopian society there is a community of senior phylarchs who discuss state issues. Everyone spends time in the farmlands for two year periods. The Utopians despise war and at all costs do not get involved in war. In Machiavellian
Premium Army Prince Military
Conflicts That Were Occurring in Medieval England? Medieval England was the time period where there were plenty of invasions. Some of the socioeconomic conflicts that were occurring in medieval England‚ were changes in agriculture‚ town crisis‚ and peasant uprising. These conflicts caused England to be where it is today. The Changes in agriculture were the tools were improved and a new system was developed. Heavy tools‚ such as the plow‚ were made to be lighter so the job would be easier. Farmers
Premium Black Death Bubonic plague Agriculture
Colonial impact on the economy of Eastern India(1757-1857) Anuradha Jaiswal‚ Associate Professor‚ During the colonial era‚ the government’s economic policies in India were concerned more with protecting and promoting British interests than with advancing the welfare of the Indian population. Identifying and characterizing the agrarian changes that occurred over the vast area of eastern India‚ during a period of about hundred years is difficult task‚ nevertheless
Premium Bihar
feudal system.Nobles had control over the knights and peasants. Kings and queens found it difficult to rule without the help of the nobles for three main reasons. Firstly they needed the force of fighting men (knights) on call if their power was threatened‚ Secondly they needed someone to travel their messages it was hard for rulers to make their power felt in distant parts and lastly they needed someone to look after the manor this meant hiring peasants (serfs)to farm the land. In return nobles were given
Free Feudalism Nobility Middle Ages
The debate on whether Alexander II was a Tsar Liberator is one which divides the opinion of many historians who examine Russian history. Alexander II introduced many reforms during his reign which revolutionised the political‚ social and economic landscape of Russia and were considered by many as ‘liberating’. My definition of ‘to liberate’ is to set free‚ either from oppression‚ confinement or indeed foreign control. Did Tsar Alexander do this and to what extent? The Emancipation of Serfs in 1861
Premium Alexander II of Russia Russia Alexander III of Russia
bourgeois dined on fine cheeses and meats and drank expensive bottles of wine from the Chateau region while peasants drank contaminated water and ate grain often harvested from diseased crops. Water for the peasants was often dug from shallow wells and poured through linen for sanitary purposes. Most French noblemen knew better‚ and kept a "wine-only" drinking policy. Diseased crops were fed to peasants in time of paucity‚ and often caused the deaths of many from diseases like tuberculosis and dysentery
Premium Poverty Disease Death
China/Vietnam border and formed the Vietnam Revolutionary Youth League with communist exiles. Rise to prominence Formation of the Indochinese communist party (ICP) ← 1930 formed ICP ← Promised land reform‚ worker‚ soldier‚ peasant govt & banks >great peasant support ← ICP remained ineffective before WW2. Comintern support for Popular Front govt in France- ICP/French cooperation but then USSR signed non aggression pact with Nazi Germany‚ ICP forced underground Experiences in China
Premium Ho Chi Minh Vietnam Vietnam War
as normal citizens. Second‚ the US was condemned for enacting programs that forced Vietnamese citizens out of their villages‚ often destroying their homes in the process. However‚ this was merely to isolate rural peasants from contact with the National Liberation Front‚ so that the peasants would not be influenced by their communist ideals. Finally‚ American commanders clearly sectioned off areas as “free-fire zones‚” in which soldiers were directed to shoot at anything that entered this territory
Premium Vietnam War United States Cold War
Party. Two parties developed in the 1920s‚ the Chinese Communist Party and the Kuomintang. The Kuomintang - Communists United Front had formed first and then divided into the two separate units. Mao had encouraged peasant activities against landlords‚ and this had hastened the split. The Kuomintang was allied with the warlords and was thus stronger militarily than the Chinese Communist Party‚ leaving the Chinese Communist Party struggling in the rural
Premium Chinese Civil War Kuomintang Mao Zedong
land owned by peasants only grew 24.2 per cent. There was a shortage of determination to improve the land by the Tsar. The view on autocracy was being undermined‚ even though there was trust in the Tsar by most people. The Tsar’s ignorance on issues such as the poor living conditions for the peasants‚ as well as aspects such as working hours‚ child labour and wages gave more for some to Russians to get annoyed about. Rising prices along with tremendous taxes influenced the peasants to revolt‚ hence
Free Russia Russian Empire Saint Petersburg