Public Interest Litigation (PIL) PIL in broad terms means litigation filed in a court of law for the protection of “Public Interest” on the wide variety of subjects concerning citizens. The history: Public Interest Litigation popularly known as PIL can be broadly defined as litigation in the interest of that nebulous entity: the public in general. Prior to 1980s‚ only the aggrieved party could personally knock the doors of justice and seek remedy for his grievance and any other person who
Premium Civil procedure Supreme Court of the United States Court
A dispensing mechanism ousted the formal legal system: Public Interest litigation Public interest litigation is a concept of recent origin evolved by the supreme court on the plinth of equal justice by giving liberal interpretation to the long standing rigid concept of locus standi. The supreme court advocated for social justice for the poor by the way of public interest litigation and court devised the new tool for mitigating the suffering of poor people. Article 39A of the constitution mandates
Free Supreme Court of the United States United States Constitution United States
reformation of the civil justice system in 1998 was as result of the issues identified by Lord Woolf as hindrances to effective civil litigation. Prior to Woolf report‚ it was perceived that civil litigation has two main problems; cost of litigation and the duration of court proceedings. The effect of the enquiry and the report thereafter‚ created new system of litigation where parties are encouraged to settle dispute without a formal court proceeding. The process of taking a civil case to court is
Premium Law Supreme Court of the United States United States
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION Public interest litigation (PIL) defined as the use of litigation‚ or legal action‚ which seeks to advance the cause of minority or disadvantaged groups or individuals‚ or which raises issues of broad public concern. PIL represents a departure from traditional judicial proceedings‚ as litigation is not necessarily filed by the aggrieved person. Public interest litigation describes the legal implements which allow individuals‚ groups and communities to challenge
Premium Law Court Supreme Court of the United States
Microsoft – Motivations‚ Ethics‚ and Conflict Management Like a snowflake‚ no two people are alike; human beings may be the most complex organisms on the planet earth. Successful organizations such as Microsoft are filled with hundreds and sometimes thousands of these unique beings‚ each with his or her own unique personalities and behavior. How does an organization like Microsoft find the delicate balance between enforcing‚ guiding‚ and motivating their people while achieving phenomenal results
Free Conflict Management Ethics
Pearson and McDonald’s Lawsuit Analysis Samantha Penico University of Maryland University College‚ AMBA 610 Executive Summary There are two major lawsuits which the main populace has defined as frivolous. One of those cases is the McDonald’s split coffee case. This is the case where the plaintiff spilled her coffee and was rumored to sue McDonald’s for 2.7 million dollars and win. The other’s case is the Pearson dry cleaning case where a man sued Chung Dry Cleaner’s 54 million dollars for
Premium Jury Burn Tort
Introduction Lawsuits are going to be filed every day‚ you can file a suit against anyone whether there is merit for it or not. We sometimes find ourselves in front of a judge for issues that we find unjust‚ Lacking Facts and merit that are definitely not meant for justice to be served but more of unethical reasons. We often call these situations Frivolous injustice. Frivolous lawsuits are normally lawsuits that will be brought to the courts lacking factual evidence and the outcome is that they
Premium Burn Coffee Fahrenheit
Tort Law and Cases: A Comparison of Two Cases and Their Potential Frivolity8/22/2010 | Introduction “A tort is a civil wrong resulting in injury to a person or property”; that is brought before a court to compensate the injured party (Bagley & Savage‚ 2010‚ pg 251). In order to prove an intentional tort‚ the following conditions must be met: 1) Intent 2) Voluntary act by the defendant 3) Causation 4) Injury or Harm. The following tort cases‚ Pearson v. Chung and Liebeck
Premium Tort Tort law
LA110 Torts and Litigation I Week 4 Homework Assignment Part 2 Assignment: Answer all questions in paragraph format. Chapter 9 page 143: Review Questions 1 - 15 1. A vicarious liability is one person or a third party‚ may be found liable for the act of another or shares liability with the actor. 2. Imputed negligence is places upon one person responsibility for the negligence of another. 3. A respondent superior is a master liable in certain circumstances for the wrongful acts of his
Premium Tort law Employment Agency
INTRODUCTION Public Interest Litigation: The term "Public Interest" means the larger interests of the public‚ general welfare and interest of the masses ((Oxford English Dictionary 2nd Edn.) Vol.Xll) and the Word “Litigation” means "a legal action including all proceedings therein‚ initiated in a court of Law with the purpose of enforcing a right or seeking a remedy." Thus‚ the expression `Public Interest Litigation’ means "any litigation conducted for the benefit of public or for removal of some
Premium Human rights