To start with I would like to say that honestly I have never been exposed in some argues on the topic of abortion. Consequently‚ this theme is new and is not habitual for me. Have never read any papers that are discussing different points of view on abortion before I was really inspired and amazed of the depth and clearness Judith Jarvis Thomson uses in her “A Defense of Abortion”. The point of this essay is to explain and think on the argument she provides in her work. The first thing that I opened
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Gender
After reading “A defense of Abortion” by Judith Jarvis Thomson and what he had to say with his violinist analogy involving the kidney replacement. I agree with what he has to say on not only abortion itself but‚ whether or not a fetus should have the right to the women’s body. I don’t think that the fetus should be given the right to use the women’s body because what if she does not what to have a baby and ends up getting pregnant anyway. Also‚ each time a woman engages in sexual intercourse‚ she
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Fetus
Judith Jarvis Thomson: A Defense of Abortion – CRITICAL EXPOSITION The goal of Judith Jarvis Thomson in her defense of abortion is to sway the ideas of those who are against abortion by challenging the arguments they give for thinking so. She begins by stating a premise. “For the sake of the argument” a human embryo is a person. This premise is one of the arguments most opponents of abortion use‚ but as she points out‚ isn’t much of an argument at all. These people spend a lot of their time dwelling
Premium
have ever taken‚ certain arguments grabbed my attention more than others. Of these‚ the argument and position presented by Judith Jarvis Thomson in “A Defense of Abortion” caused me to rethink my view on the topic. Raised in a politically conservative environment‚ the argument against abortion I most commonly heard was that fetuses are people and should be afforded rights
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights
that abortion is impermissible to many society and thus ‚ it is viewed to be an immoral act . Abortion pertains to the willful killing of a human fetus through its removal from the maternal womb before its actual birth ( Abortion ’ 26
Premium Human rights Abortion Pregnancy
As the title makes plain‚ Thomson asserts that abortion is not impermissible. More exactly‚ she argues for the conclusion that at times‚ abortion is permissible; she asserts that there are scenarios in which getting an abortion would be immoral. What is especially innovative is the way in which her argument is constructed by Thomson. She starts the essay by pointing out the argument over abortion seems to numerous individuals to hinge on whether the fetus is a man. Most feel that if we could simply
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Abortion debate
debate on abortion is primarily made up of two sides: prolife and prochoice. The prolife side’s main argument is that the fetus is a person and therefore has a right to life. Judith Thomson addresses this argument in her paper‚ “A Defense of Abortion‚” by giving a hypothetical sick violinist example. In this example‚ kidnappers abduct a healthy stranger and‚ after rendering him unconscious‚ performs a surgery to “connect” the healthy stranger to the famous ailing violinist (1. Thomson‚ CC 153). This
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights
Abortion The main pro-life against abortion argument goes like this: Killing a human life is wrong and a fetus is a human life; therefore‚ killing a fetus is wrong. However‚ the debate is always surrounded by the second premise which is: at what point of a pregnancy is a fetus a human being. As medical science and technology progress‚ the line might shift back and forth. For the sake of this argument‚ I will neglect the second premise; I will say that a fetus is a human being at the time of conception
Premium Human Abortion Decision making
Philosophy 1001-001 A Defense of Abortion in Pregnancy Reduction In this paper I will discuss the relevance of J.J. Thomson’s argument in her article‚ A Defense of Abortion‚ to that of pregnancy reduction and if there is any relevance‚ if there are exceptions or situations where that might change. J.J. Thomson’s argument in A Defense of Abortion is that the one thing a person has rights to is his/her body and the right to control what happens with it. Thomson also states that there is an innate
Premium Pregnancy Abortion Reproduction
“Abortion is Murder!” I read that on a protester’s sign almost every day when I drive to school. The protesters are standing outside of a Planed Parenthood Clinic‚ where abortions are performed. Abortion is a hot-button issue in American politics and media. But are abortions permissible or impermissible? This question is a major topic for many philosophers. Some philosophers‚ including Don Marquis‚ view that abortion is mostly impermissible. They find abortion impermissible because it kills and innocent
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Human rights