opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statement as of and for the year ended Dec 31‚ 2006 of Oceanview Marine Company. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose reports have been furnished to us‚ and our opinion‚ insofar as it relates to data included for Oceanview Marine Company‚ Dec 2007‚ is based solely on the report of the other auditor-Talbert and Johnson‚ PC. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally
Premium United States Financial audit Audit
Fax: (715)555-5556 March 7‚ 2014 Joan Togstad 2122 XYZ Street Eau Claire‚ WI 55555 RE: NON-ENGAGEMENT Dear Mrs. Togstad: Thank you for your interest in our law firm. As we previously discussed when you came into our office December 27 2013‚ I needed to do some research before accepting to represent you and your husband in this case. At this time I would like to inform you we are unable to represent your husband or yourself in this medical malpractice matter
Premium Medical malpractice Injury Wisconsin
Dear Mr. Smith‚ This letter confirms our understanding of the arrangements for our audit of the financial statements of Apollo Shoes‚ for the year ending December 31‚ 2012. We will audit Apollo Shoe’s balance sheet as of 12/31/2012‚ along with the related income statement‚ statement of retained earnings‚ and statement of cash flows for the entire year of 2012. We will provide a professional opinion based on the information found in the audit. All of the financial statements will be the responsibility
Premium Balance sheet Internal control
Engagement Letter Apollo Shoes‚ This letter is to confirm our understanding of the terms and objectives of our engagement and the nature of the services we will provide. We will audit the consolidated balance sheet of Apollo Shoes as of year end 2007‚ and the related consolidated statements of operations‚ retained earnings‚ and cash flows. The objective of our audit is the expression of an opinion about whether your consolidated financial statements are fairly presented‚ in all material
Premium Balance sheet Accounts receivable
Audit Case- Tommy O’Connell The audit case I chose was case #1‚ Tommy O’Connell- Audit Senior. O’Connell is a newly appointed senior auditor for a big 5 firm‚ and he was given the tough audit engagement for the Altamesa Manufacturing Company. Tommy figured this engagement would help him get in good with the partner that was in charge of the audit‚ Jack Morrison. The only problem was he was assigned Carl‚ who is a fresh-faced staff accountant who has been working at the company for less than three
Premium Audit Financial audit Auditing
WorldCom The Story of a Whistleblower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 Hollinger International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Realities of Audit-Related Litigation instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute a day in the life of brent dorsey staff auditor Professional Pressures inS tr uc t ional o b je c t ive
Premium Ethics Auditing Audit
INTERNAL AUDIT REPORT 2011-09 KincaidOutdoorCenterCashControls ParksandRecreationDepartment July 12‚20II OF ANCHORAGE MUNICIPALITY Internal Audit Department 632 W 6th Avenue‚Suite600 P . O .B ox 1 9 6 6 5 0 Anchorage‚Alaska 99519-6650 http://www.muni.org/audit OFFICE OF THE INTERNAL AUDITOR PeterRaiskums‚CIA‚ CFE‚ CGFM Director Phone: (907) 343-4438 Fax: (907) 343-4370 E-Mail: raiskumspw@muni.org OF AIVCHORAGE M UNICIPALITY Phone:907-343-4438 Fax:907-343-4370 Auditor Officeof the Internal 632W
Premium Auditing Financial audit Internal audit
the auditing procedure even if the auditor has no reason to suspect that related party transaction. Moreover‚ it is important to recognize the related party transactions that may give high risk misstatement. An auditor have to discussed with the engagement team regarding a specific consideration that have to be made due to susceptibility of the financial statement to material misstatement resulting from the related party transactions. This is due an auditor examination may be affected if there is
Premium Auditing Financial audit Audit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.5 Collins Harp Enterprises 5.6 Sarbox Scooter‚ Inc. 5.7 Société Générale Recommending IT Systems Development Controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Scoping and Evaluation Judgments in the Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How a Low-Risk Trading Area Caused a $7.2 Billion Loss instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute instructor resource Manual
Premium Internal control Auditing Audit
appeals declined to imply one. See Colorado State Bd. of Accountancy v. Zaveral Boosalis Raisch‚ 931 P.2d 498‚ 500 (Colo. App. 1996).(1) We agree and affirm. I. The Board received an unsigned letter alleging improprieties in the accounting practices of ZBR in connection with two casinos. The writer of this letter accused ZBR of violating accepted accounting principles and of preparing deficient auditing statements
Premium Colorado Accountant Certified Public Accountant