Diana Blumberg Baumrind is a clinical and developmental psychologist that specializes in parenting styles. Baumrind was born on August 23‚ 1927 in a small Jewish community in New York City; she was the first of two daughters born to Hyman and Mollie Blumberg. Baumrind earned a B.A. in philosophy at Hunter College in 1948. She later received her M.A. and Ph. D. in Psychology at the University of California‚ Berkley; she studied developmental‚ clinical‚ and social psychology. Her doctoral dissertation
Premium Psychology Developmental psychology Woman
Argument Synthesis Option #1: Stanley Milgram vs. Diana Baumrind At very young ages‚ most of us are taught the importance of being obedient. Many of us may have even been rewarded for obedience and punished for disobedience. For most of us‚ being obedient creates a sense of accomplishment and pride‚ but what happens when we are put in a position where obeying a certain order results with violating ones own moral beliefs? In 1963‚ Stanley Milgram‚ a professor of psychology at Yale University
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Social psychology
experiment that test how far individuals would go in obeying orders‚ even if carrying out those orders caused serious harm to others. This experiment caused a lot of controversy and one woman in particular believed that this experiment was immoral. Diana Baumrind’s "Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience" says that Milgram "entrapped" (329) his subjects and potentionally harmed his subjects mentally. Both authors are obviously concerned with ethics and validity but both see them in a
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
in his paper‚ “The Perils of Obedience.” Milgram argues that people are far too obedient to authority without justified reason. According to this view‚ people follow orders far too easily because they are trained to obey. On the other hand‚ Diana Baumrind‚ in her response “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience argues that Milgram’s results were poorly tested and are therefore inaccurate. In her words‚ “The laboratory is not the place to study degree of obedience or suggestibility…since
Premium Stanford prison experiment Milgram experiment Psychology
According to Diana Baumrind‚ there are four distinct types of parenting styles that parents use‚ depending on their own personality traits‚ the traits of the child‚ and their understanding of child development. Some parent show high rates of ACCEPTANCE/RESPONSIVENESS‚ an element of parenting that shows the amount of warmth and affection in the relationship between the parent and the child. On the other end of this is the DEMANDINGNESS/CONTROL aspect of parenting that weighs the amount of structure
Premium Childhood Parenting Parenting styles
UNIT 2 THE FOUR (4) MAJOR PARENTING STYLES According to psychologist Diana Baumrind there are four parenting styles; Authoritarian‚ Authoritative‚ Permissive and Uninvolved parenting. Baumrind studied how these parenting styles impacted a child’s development. • Authoritarian Parenting – this type of parent is demanding but not responsive‚ children are expected to follow the strict rules and parents fail to explain their reasons behind their rules and might just reply by saying‚ “Because I said
Free Parenting styles
instance‚ Stanley Milgram‚ in his article‚ Perils of Obedience‚ writes about his experiment‚ of how people obey an authority‚ neglecting their conscience‚ and how this can be a threat to real life experiences. In contrast‚ another Psychologist‚ Diana Baumrind‚ in her article‚ "Review of Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience‚" states that Milgram’s experiment was unsuccessful for many reasons; and therefore‚ it is not valid. Both Psychologists have different views on the validity of the experiment
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
of obedience. One of his colleagues‚ Diana Baumrind‚ however‚ strongly disagreed with Milgram and has good reasons to criticize his experiment. She thought his experiment was unethical and very harmful to the social well-being of the participants. In her article‚ “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience”‚ she castigated Milgram’s experiment and provided valid points as to why tests such as Milgram’s should not continue. Both Milgram and Baumrind are obviously concerned with values and
Premium Psychology Milgram experiment Stanford prison experiment
Baumrind vs. Milgram Milgram conducted an experiment which includes the subject of the experiment is in a laboratory environment and is told to give increasingly severe electric shocks to another person. The subject is getting told to do so by a person in a white lab coat‚ who appears to be a scientist; but is actually an actor. The person in the white lab coat tells the subject to continue to increase the level of shock the other person receives until they reach the level of “Danger Severe Shock
Premium Stanford prison experiment Psychology Milgram experiment
their own morals. Usually‚ obedience wins because of the emphasis society has placed on it. Most of human’s actions are a result of a previous action in which they felt necessary to do. Both authors‚ Stanley Milgram of “The Perils of Obedience” and Ian Parker of “Obedience” agree that‚ humans‚ as a whole‚ will not respond the same in every similar situation because their actions are usually a result of obedience or of their current situation‚ rather than their personality. In Milgram’s article‚ he
Premium Stanford prison experiment Human Person