the members as separate legal persons as decided in the case Salomon v Salomon. - However‚ in certain circumstances‚ a court may ignore the separate legal entity of a company (lifting the corporate veil) and look at the members of the company and make them liable. - The relevant rule here is the use of company to evade legal obligation to commit fraud under the case law or judicial exceptions and the relevant case is Jones v Lipman. (3/4
Premium Legal person Person Corporations law
DIMAPORO V. HRET FACTS: This is a petition brought by Congressman Dimaporo seeking to nullify the twin Resolutions of the HRET which denied his Motion for Technical Evaluation of the Thumbmarks and Signatures Affixed in the Voters Registration Records and Motion for Reconsideration of Resolution Denying the Motion for Technical Examination of Voting Records. Pursuant to the 1998 HRET Rules Congressional candidate Mangotara Petition of Protest (Ad Cautelam) seeking the technical examination
Premium Voting system United States Constitution Election
Gideon V. Wainwright Name of teacher: Mr. James Pierce Name of student: Course: Criminal Court Systems Assignment due date: December 16‚ 2013 January 8‚ 2014 Gideon V. Wainwright Since time immemorial‚ history has always recorded in its annals that man is by nature both a rebellious and dominant creature. Because of these two innate traits‚ it seems nearly impossible for men to cohabit or coexist without having any channel or medium through which one man does not feel
Premium Gideon v. Wainwright United States Constitution Law
Derek Brown Professor Janet Smith Employment Law BA370 25 July 2011 REEVES V. C.H. ROBIONSON WORLDWIDE The legal issue in this case was whether Reeves was subjected to harassment based on her sex and whether the harassment was sufficiently severe or pervasive to be actionable. The court reversed the lower court’s grant of summary judgment to C.H. Robinson‚ holding that “sex specific” language satisfies the “based on sex” element even when the language does not target the plaintiff. The
Premium Discrimination Employment
Is V a Villain or a Hero? This is a very debatable subject that could get intense because‚ V had his Heroic and Villain moments. For instance‚ saving Evey more than twice. Villain moments like saving the people of Lark Hill. V wants to gain the revenge from such a corrupt society that led him to being mad‚ he takes this madness and develops it into heroic acts to save the society. Revenge is a very powerful emotion. V uses these emotions to help the people wake up and find out what is really happening
Premium Hero Odysseus Odyssey
Name: |Date: | |Graded Assignment Korematsu v. the United States (1944) Use the background information and the primary sources in the Graded Assignment: Primary Sources sheet to answer the following questions. (2 points) |Score | | | 1. What did Fred T. Korematsu do that resulted in his arrest and conviction? Answer: (2 points) |Score | | | 2. According to the first paragraph from the excerpts
Premium United States
“Kramer v. Kramer” In the beginning of the movie‚ Billy was primarily raised by his mother while his father‚ Ted‚ was apathetic towards the raising of his child. Not even aware of Billy’s grade level‚ Ted was seen as a workaholic with an overall permissive parenting style. He was always subject to Billy’s desires‚ had little punishment‚ and also little bonding time with Billy. For example‚ Ted was working on a project for work and Billy‚ being a kid‚ wanted him to play with him. Instead
Premium Theory of cognitive development Jean Piaget Parent
I was lying down on my deathbed‚ surrounded by my family‚ I told them that I wanted to tell a story‚ a story that I wanted them to know about. I Timothy the V was born into a family of poverty in the year 1657. As a young lad I grew up very poor‚ we never had much as you can imagine‚ but much is better than nothing. My mum and dad couldn’t afford to send me to school so every single day me and my dad will go to work at the mines. The little money that we managed to gather we were barely able to buy
Premium
Abortion The U.S. Supreme Court declared abortion to be a “fundamental right” guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution in the 1973 abortion case Roe v. Wade (www.abortionprocon.org). This ruling was based on the Constitution giving “a guarantee of certain areas or zones of privacy‚” and also “This right to privacy… is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy.” The U.S. abortion debate has raged on ever since this decision‚ making it a huge religious‚ political
Premium Abortion Pregnancy Fetus
They want to exploit the land * NOT assessable Scottish Australian Mining Co Ltd V FCT * 3rd mining company * After full use of the land‚ they subdivided and sold it * No intention to make a profit by reselling it * This is considered to be a process of realizing capital because the land can no longer be used FCT v Whitfords Beach Pty Ltd- the fishing shack * The case was very similar to Scottish Mining BUT! They transformed from a
Premium Economics Management Business