CHAPTER 6 Audit Evidence |Learning Check | 6-1. a. Audit evidence is all the information used by the auditor in arriving at the conclusion on which the audit opinion is based. Audit evidence includes (1) the accounting records underlying the financial statements and (2) other information that corroborates the accounting records and supports the auditor’s logical reasoning about fair presentation in the financial statements. b. Any information that is obtained
Premium Audit Internal control Auditing
Chapter 4 Legal Liability for auditors 4-1. Understand litigious environment‚ which CPAs practice According to Google dictionary‚ litigious environment means a controversial environment. Where a simple mishaps can end up in a heavy lawsuit. Under common law‚ audit professionals have the responsibility to their client to fulfill their agreed on contracts. However‚ if one audit fails to fulfill their contract‚ not only they have to take responsibility to their clients but in some circumstances
Free Auditor's report Auditing Legal terms
WorldCom The Story of a Whistleblower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3.5 Hollinger International . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Realities of Audit-Related Litigation instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute a day in the life of brent dorsey staff auditor Professional Pressures inS tr uc t ional o b je c t ive
Premium Ethics Auditing Audit
Textbook DC 6-8 You have been assigned to the audit of the financial statements of Office Moving and Storage Limited (OMS) for its year ending December 31‚ 20X2. The company started 10 years ago and is in the business of moving furniture and equipment for company offices across Canada‚ and also providing storage for companies requiring that service. The company is owned by three shareholders who are all involved in operating the company. OMS owns four properties outside of major urban centres;
Premium Risk Auditing Audit
Audit Case- Tommy O’Connell The audit case I chose was case #1‚ Tommy O’Connell- Audit Senior. O’Connell is a newly appointed senior auditor for a big 5 firm‚ and he was given the tough audit engagement for the Altamesa Manufacturing Company. Tommy figured this engagement would help him get in good with the partner that was in charge of the audit‚ Jack Morrison. The only problem was he was assigned Carl‚ who is a fresh-faced staff accountant who has been working at the company for less than three
Premium Audit Financial audit Auditing
Summary Phar-Mor‚ Inc. was a deep-discount store that had substantial growth in a short period of time. It started with 15 stores and grew to over 310 stores in thirty two states between 1985 and 1992. At first Phar-Mor was seen as a major prospect in the retail market. With sales of over $3 billion and growing‚ Phar-Mor’s success even worried some of the biggest retail giant‚ including Wal-mart. The president‚ founder‚ and COO of Phar-Mor was Mickey Monus‚ who became quite extravagant with
Premium Audit Auditing Financial audit
Scoping and Evaluation Judgments in the Audit of Internal Control over Financial Reporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . How a Low-Risk Trading Area Caused a $7.2 Billion Loss instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute instructor resource Manual — do not coPy or redistribute easy clean/simply steam‚ co. evaluation of internal control environment inS tr uc t ional o b je c t ive S [1] [2] [3] [4] c a s e 5.1-2 Mark S. Beasley · Frank
Premium Internal control Auditing Audit
accountant-client privilege‚ see § 13-90-107(1)(f)(I)‚ 5 C.R.S. (1997)‚ to refuse compliance‚ absent the client’s consent‚ with a subpoena issued by the Board. The Denver District Court interpreted exercise of the Board’s subpoena power‚ see § 12-2-126(1)(a)‚ 4 C.R.S. (1997)‚ as an exception to the accountant-client privilege. In the absence of express legislative language creating an exception‚ the court of appeals declined to imply one. See Colorado State Bd. of Accountancy v. Zaveral Boosalis Raisch‚ 931
Premium Colorado Accountant Certified Public Accountant
Case 6-4 1. All three methods do affect the net income - Deducted Purchased Goods: Will affect the cost of the good by decreasing it‚ which will affect the net income in the period the product is sold. - Other Income: Net Income would be higher than the other methods. - Not taken discount as expense: Cost of goods sold will be lower as discount will be counted‚ however it will decrease net income while being an expense. Overall‚ the cost of goods sold will be affected‚ therefore gross margin
Premium Revenue
related party have been properly recorded by a client‚ an auditor should review info that provided by the management regarding the related party transactions. The auditor has to conduct audit procedure to ensure that information provided can be reviewed for completeness. If the availability regarding related party audit evidence is limited‚ the auditor may discuss with the management regarding the transaction amount and term‚ the nature of the relationship of client and related party and inspect the
Premium Auditing Financial audit Audit