Preview

William's Changes to the Government

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1328 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
William's Changes to the Government
‘William I changed little in the government and administration of England’. How far do you agree?

When William, duke of Normandy, conquered England he had a new problem of how to control his new, and very different country. No drastic changes are evident, as it would appear that William was able to use the basis of the pre-existing Anglo-Saxon government. S. B Chrimes opinion of William's changes to government agrees with this, saying that the early Norman government was an "elaboration rather than innovation".
William was able to employ many different forms of the existing Anglo-Saxon English government and use them differently to his advantage. William was able to utilize the predominantly Norman royal household (remaining from Edward the Confessor’s reign), which was already the centre of government and develop this further by rewarding any Normans who had advised or helped during his conquest of England, therefore increasing the number of people from Norman origin in his court. By doing this William was able to surround himself with trusted advisors. This itself was not a complete turnaround as there had already been a strong influence of Norman culture in the royal household of Edward the confessor, who himself had been born in Normandy.
The royal household at this time contained the entire king's government, the central governing body of which was called the Curia Regis. The Curia Regis was not a new concept in England; its roots can be found in the Anglo-Saxon Witenagemot. It would appear that William's Curia Regis emerged from the foundation concepts of the Witenagemot and showed no real administrative difference, and like the household generally, the people in government and high positions were deposed to be replaced by more Normans as William once again rewarded those who had helped him, placing people he knew within the major roles around him. William also adapted the Anglo-Saxon earldoms which, after the rebellions in 1067-70 proved to be too

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    From this struggle for power, Somerset emerged as leader. It is evident that he did not have enough support in the government, as he had to resort to the use of proclamations. Government under Henry VIII had been strong. However the same system, whereby the power of the monarch was based in Parliament, was not workable with a king who was only a minor,…

    • 1997 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There was some focus on Edwards’s failure to provide a direct heir to the throne when he died. Even though there was still an element of election made by Edward as the King not the Witen appointing an successor as William of Normandy was promised the throne in 1051 and then again in 1064 by Edward and then appointing Harold the next King on his death bed. Harold exercised a powerful position as the pre-eminent Anglo-Saxon earl, second to the King, but his position was not paramount during the reign of Edward. He was strong enough to make a bid for…

    • 558 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VI and the Nobility

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages

    extremely weak one with Henry VI who seemed to show a clear lack of interest in ruling the country, and…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason why he got involved with William was because the borders between England and Wales were an issue. The borders between the two countries kept shifting which led to disputes between the Welsh and the English over the land. This would have created tension and William would have had to intervene. This is why he built castles along the border so he could establish the line between his country and Wales. Also, why he wanted this line to be established was because Wales was having a power struggle itself. Because there were multiple princes in Wales there were many disputes going on and William did not want this ‘spilling over’ into his country.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main reason why the Norman’s won was due to Harold’s death. After he died the Saxon’s lost all momentum,…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Battle of Hastings was fought on the 14th October 1066 (shortly after King Edward the confessor had died) between Harold Godwinson and William of Normandy. The battle was fought on Senlac hill 10 kilometres away from Hastings. The battle started because when King Edward died, he left no heir to the throne. The men who claimed to be king were Harald Hadrada, Harold Godwinson and William of Normandy. This essay will decide why William won the battle of Hastings by looking at the tree following factors: William’s skill, Harold’s poor leadership and Harold’s bad luck.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Trade Vs Manorialism

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Each of the english monarchs had grown more and more power. William tightened the iron fist by creating feudalism 2.0, the domesday book, and built plenty of castles. Henry I followed suit, establishing the exchequer and creating traveling judges to try courts, then Henry II, started a 12 man jury and allowed nobles to buy their way out of becoming a knight. So when Henry II died and left his son, John, to the throne, it seemed natural that the king's power would continue to grow...well not exactly this time (sorry King John). Nobody really liked King John. He was always trying to increase taxes, including illegal church taxes and noble's taxes, and inevitably lost most of England's french land ( AU REVOIR JOHNNY). Usually, the…

    • 2461 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When Edward came into power in 1042, England was in a poor state financially and also because of threats of an invasion and this made the first few years of his rule difficult. Edward was faced with many problems which he had to overcome. These problems involved; powerful Earls, (especially the Godwine’s), the foreign policy and the domestic policy. Edward both failed and succeeded in these problems due to a number of factors. These include a lack of knowledge about his kingdom and some may argue that he was naïve in his decisions. With some evaluation, we will be able to judge if Edward was a successful King or not.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    William affected the Early States by creating a society in which there was religious and political freedom. He, through enlightenment philosophies, created religious tolerance where people won't be prosecuted for what they believe in. He also created a democratic system with fair trials,freedom from unjust imprisonment and free elections; ideas that greatly influenced the American Constitution.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    William of Normandy had a certain purpose in mind when he ordered the Tower of London to be built. William of Normandy was not even English, but he was once promised the throne to England by his cousin, King Edward. However, on King Edward’s deathbed, he gave the throne…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    outline

    • 833 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. King Saxon Henry I and rebuilt royal power, leaving his successor King Otto I in a great territorial position…

    • 833 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Miss

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * Before he was raised to peerage, William Cecil had quite a lot of control over the House of Commons.…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    In order to understand the historical context here is a short overview of William´s II life.…

    • 4271 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ivanhoe

    • 4861 Words
    • 20 Pages

    toward the end of the reign of King Richard I, England is in the grip of turmoil. The king is far from the country, having been imprisoned by the rulers of Austria and Germany on his way home from the Crusades. In his absence, the throne is held by Prince John, but the real authority lies in the hands of the nobles, who have used Richard's absence as an excuse to fortify their own power at the expense of the monarchy's. This state of affairs has aggravated relations between the two groups of people who inhabit England: the Saxons, who ruled England until 1066, and the Normans, a French people who conquered the island under William the Conqueror. The nation's powerful nobles are all Normans, and the Norman nobles have been seizing the lands of less powerful Saxon nobles, forcing many Saxons to become serfs. The remaining Saxon lords are tense and angry. The division between the two peoples is so great that even though a common English language exists between them, they generally speak their own native tongues--French for the Normans, Anglo-Saxon (sometimes called Old English today) for the Saxons.…

    • 4861 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    the Normans have the position of Duke of Normandy and the English Royal Crown (British).…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays