‘Environmental Problems Can Only Be Solved by Transforming Our Ethical Standpoints – Once This Is Achieved Our Social and Political Institutions Will Be Transformed as Well’ Critically Assess the Political Discourses
‘Environmental problems can only be solved by transforming our ethical standpoints – once this is achieved our social and political institutions will be transformed as well’
Critically assess the political discourses and ethical approaches that support this claim. Illustrate with reference to environmental problems and policy responses towards them.
The transformist political discourse of ecological socialism, anarchism and ecofeminism are concerned with human emancipation and incorporate solving the environmental dilemmas that are a symptom of our era. These discourses show that only by transforming our ethical standpoints will we be able to resolve the issues that face us in the future and from these transformations, new social and political institutions will emerge. These approaches challenge the historically based assumptions and values inherent in our conservative western society by asking us to think differently about things we take for granted. The social transformist discourses cover a wide range of political thought from the liberals, through social democrats to democratic socialists and at the extreme left, the Marxists. The anti-authoritarian anarchists are similarly wide-ranging from the militant grassroots activists to the pacifist supporter of Gandhi. The ecofeminist extends the anarchist thought but is a critic of the entrenched inequalities represented by androcentrism (male-centredness) suggesting that the domination of nature reflects man’s domination of the female in western society.
Ecological concerns are often viewed as opposing the capitalist ethics of modern society which is seen as ignoring the consequences in both human and environmental terms of industrialisation and wealth creation. The social transformists unite in their goal to represent the working classes leading to common concerns over the environment. The liberal approach would suggest that there is a need for fair play. Rules governing conduct provide the
Critically assess the political discourses and ethical approaches that support this claim. Illustrate with reference to environmental problems and policy responses towards them.
The transformist political discourse of ecological socialism, anarchism and ecofeminism are concerned with human emancipation and incorporate solving the environmental dilemmas that are a symptom of our era. These discourses show that only by transforming our ethical standpoints will we be able to resolve the issues that face us in the future and from these transformations, new social and political institutions will emerge. These approaches challenge the historically based assumptions and values inherent in our conservative western society by asking us to think differently about things we take for granted. The social transformist discourses cover a wide range of political thought from the liberals, through social democrats to democratic socialists and at the extreme left, the Marxists. The anti-authoritarian anarchists are similarly wide-ranging from the militant grassroots activists to the pacifist supporter of Gandhi. The ecofeminist extends the anarchist thought but is a critic of the entrenched inequalities represented by androcentrism (male-centredness) suggesting that the domination of nature reflects man’s domination of the female in western society.
Ecological concerns are often viewed as opposing the capitalist ethics of modern society which is seen as ignoring the consequences in both human and environmental terms of industrialisation and wealth creation. The social transformists unite in their goal to represent the working classes leading to common concerns over the environment. The liberal approach would suggest that there is a need for fair play. Rules governing conduct provide the
References: Beck, U., (1992) Risk Society: towards a new modernity in Christoff, P., (1996) Ecological citizens and democracy in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 398-405, London: Routledge. Blowers, A., (1997) The way forward: ecological modernisation or risk society in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 382-387, London: Routledge. Bookchin. M., (1982) The Ecology of Freedom: The Emergence and Dissolution of Hierarchy, Cheshire Books, Palo Alto in King, Y., (1989) Ecology and feminism in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 333-336, London: Routledge. Christoff, P., (1996) Ecological citizens and democracy in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 398-405, London: Routledge. Dobson, A., (1990) Green Political Thought, London, HarperCollins in Mills, M., (1996) Green democracy: the search for an ethical solution in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 388-398, London: Routledge. Eckersley, R., (1992 ) Eco anarchism: the non-Marxist visionaries in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 313-324, London: Routledge. Gray, J., (1993) Beyond the New Right: Markets Government and the Common Environment, in M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: London: Routledge. Hajer, M.A., (1996) Ecological modernisation as cultural politics in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 364-373, London: Routledge. Hardin, G., (1968) The tragedy of the commons, Science, 162, pp. 1243-8 Hayward, T., (1994) Ecologism as a political ideology in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 354-363, London: Routledge. Goldblatt, D., (1996) Risk society and the environment in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 373-382, London: Routledge. Irwin, A., (1995) Citizen Science: A study of people, Expertise and sustainable development, London, Routledge. King, Y., (1989) Ecology and feminism in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 333-337, London: Routledge. Merchant, C., (1992) Emancipation and ecology in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 303-312, London: Routledge. Mills, M., (1996) Green democracy: the search for an ethical solution in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 388-398, London: Routledge. Naess, A., (1973) The Shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement, Inquiry 16, pp. 95-100 in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 196-199, London: Routledge. Sagoff, M., (1988) Economy of the earth, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press in Mills, M., (1996) Green democracy: the search for an ethical solution in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 388-398, London: Routledge. Seager, J., (1993) Deep ecology and ecofeminism in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 337-349, London: Routledge. Shiva, V., (1989) Science, nature and gender in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 325-332, London: Routledge. Taylor, A., (1992 ) The environment and the socialist ethic in Smith, M.J., (Ed.) (1999) Thinking through the Environment: 126-131, London: Routledge.