Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

‘As science advances, the importance of religion declines.’ To what extent is this an accurate claim?

Good Essays
675 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
‘As science advances, the importance of religion declines.’ To what extent is this an accurate claim?
'AS SCIENCE ADVANCES, THE IMPORTANCE OF RELIGION DECLINES. ' TO WHAT EXTENT IS THIS AN ACCURATE

CLAIM?

Students of history would be aware that during the time known as the dark ages, religion ruled supreme in Europe. In fact it was tyrannical and put to death - after frightful torture - anyone who questioned the teachings of religion. The most number of casualties of the period were from the scientists. Even famed scientists like Galileo were victims of the dreaded Inquisition. It was an uphill task for scientists to continue with their researches. Scientists - in fact intellectuals of any subject - lived in fear of religion. Realising that knowledge was power, the kings and lords of the times supported religion in its suppression of science. Hence scientists had to hide their knowledge and experiments.

Then came the decline of religion, owing to several reasons. Men became more adventurous and daring and slowly began to release them selves from the grip of the vice of religion. Then began the march in the opposite direction. People, now leaned in the direction that religion was all 'nonsense '. Hence we see that the church was questioned when Dar win published his 'Origin of Species '. As it came to be more or less rea soned that man did not come to be born as described in the bible, peo ple began to question the validity of the bible itself. Though Christianity and the bible are used as examples here, the same has happened to other religions as well. As people became more inclined towards science, they went away from religion.

Upon being installed to a respectable status, science progressed in leaps and bounds and within just a couple of centuries established itself as being the last word on what are truths and what not. What has happened since then is that - as could be expected - science has dethroned religion. However, it is regrettable that in many cases, the baby has been thrown out with the bath water. In their effort to be scientific, many people have discarded religion. What is happening now in the world is that practical ly all religions stand in opposition to science and, naturally, science stands in opposition to religion.

Religion has always been in charge of social morals and it is still common to see that many people live exactly as religion prescribes they should. But this is a tendency that is fast losing ground. Followers of religion are getting less and less. As education throughout the world is brought to more and more people, especially education with regard to science, people begin to question age old beliefs. The proof of their senses becomes more important than adages and words of wisdom stated centu ries earlier, by ancestral wise men. Also people begin to realise that reli gion is mostly cther worldly. Since the other world is theory and the world of science here for us to touch and see and live, reality often wins against idealism.

The statement that religion declines in importance in the face of the_ popularity of science is therefore true. However, there is evidence to show that religion is fighting back too. Many religions are now getting more rational. There are breakaway factions from the orthodox ways that used to insist on blind adherence. In many aspects we see that religions are becoming more scientific. Many are now reinterpreting the scriptures to make them compatible with science and still others are researching into religion using scientific methods. Some are even claiming that religion is a science. Hence we see that all is not lost with religion. It may well be discovered that religion is scientific. Laws which were up to now unknown may well be waiting to be discovered and religion may still come into its own.

REFERENCES:

Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking Penguin.

Kass, L. (1985). Toward a more natural science: Biology and human affairs. New York: The Free.

Kass, L. (2007). Science, religion, and the human future. Commentary,123(4), 36-48.

References: Dawkins, R. (2006). The God delusion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Dennett, D. (2006). Breaking the spell: Religion as a natural phenomenon. New York: Viking Penguin. Kass, L. (1985). Toward a more natural science: Biology and human affairs. New York: The Free. Kass, L. (2007). Science, religion, and the human future. Commentary,123(4), 36-48.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    “Science contributes moral as well as material blessings to the world. Its great moral contribution is objective, or the scientific point of view. The means doubting everything except facts; it means hewing to the facts, lets the chips fall where they may.” (163)…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article claims that by nature, it is impossible for science and religion to conflict primarily because their individual concerns are entirely distinct. This, however, brings about the debate of the role of both religion and science in our society. Religion I mainly faith based and is illogical, that does not require evidence. Science, on the other hand, is logical and is purely based on actual evidence. Many have criticized this idea on nonoverlapping magisteria claiming it holds no basis. For instance, given that both science and religion has different stories on how the earth came to exist, are they both teaching different domains? The debate lies on whether or not science and religion can co-exist without overlapping or…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eventhough, science provided to our society enormous knowledge about the universe and the possibilities how to use matter and energy, which lead to the mass production of superhuman technology, science has not been always appreciated by the humans. Religious communities abused the scientific individuals and theories throughout the European modern history. Ideas, that are known to be fact nowadays, like heliocentrism, dissemination of the diseases by germs, or the shape of the Earth were rejected by the society, because of the massive power of the Church. Hence, the religious impact on the educational system in the 20th century, after the breakthroughs of Newton or Einstein, portrays the humanity as a stubborn, ignorant, and intolerant civilization. The fact, that there is a countless number of churches in the United States, but the budget for NASA decreases almost every year, proves that our society is not ready to get on a higher and more intelligent level. Therefore, I suggest that our society finally acknowledges the most famous quote from Nietzsche: “God is…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine life as we know it without science. This may be hard to do, considering that scientific technology is now a perpetual symbol of modern-day life. Everything we see, everything we touch, and everything we ingest—all conceived of scientific research. But how did it come to be this way? Was it not only centuries ago that science began to surpass the authority of the church? Between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries, natural philosophers, now known as scientists, founded a new world view on science, which was previously based on the Bible and classic philosophers like Aristotle and Ptolemy. Both people connected their natural studies directly to God and the Bible, creating ideas like a geocentric earth. With time and new ideas, scientists managed to develope methods for creating and discovering things in nature, and with enough resources and patronage, were able to answer asked and unasked questions. Science, however, was not supported by everyone, and had to face many challenges to achieve the power it maintains in today’s world. Due to the strong authority that politics, religion, and common social order controlled in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, science was subjectively held in the hands of those who could utilize it or reject it.…

    • 1531 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Scientific Revolution changed everything for Europe, but one of the lasting effects of this early period was a sort of war between science and religion. What is interesting is that this occurred at a time when the Catholic Church controlled education, and many of the early scientists were actually very religious. It is telling, of course, that this movement also emerged at after the Reformation and the Discovery of America, which both led to many questions that the establishment was unable to answer. In what ways did the new science challenge the older ways of scientific thinking and the claims of the Church? What was at stake? Many attempts were made to reconcile the two groups, but none of them seemed to work. Do you think there was…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Chapter 4” discussed the relationship between the Church and new scientific ideas. From our previous discussions and readings, I knew that the Church was not very open to new ideas. However, I did not fully understand the extent of how harshly the Church treated people who they saw as “going…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    GP_Science_and_religion

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages

    The interaction between science and religion 4. Past year questions on science and religion 1. What is science? [mass noun] ‘The intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment’ – OED It is a particular way, or method, of knowing or making sense of the physical/natural/world around us.…

    • 504 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment of the 16th and 17th centuries revolutionized thought and learning. Scholasticism and humanism were replaced with rationalism and the scientific method- empiricism. Scientists were aided by funding by some governments, while others could reject findings that conflicted with their authority. Scientists, or philosophers, were both praised and condemned by religious authorities for either glorifying the intellect of God through research or delving into matter of which only the Scriptures had intellectual authority. The society of other scientists allowed them to combine ideas, while women's expected role kept them from succeeding in the same real. All in all, we see that political, religious, and social factors could both aid and hold back the work of scientists.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ap World History Dbq

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Science has made many leaps forward throughout the centuries, bringing the world advancements it has never imagined. People may argue the negatives and positives of science these days and centuries ago it was no different. During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the works and findings of scientists were greatly influenced by the approval of political figures due to their desire for power and monetary gain, the support and understanding received by influential religious personages and the downfalls of society regarding disorganization of research and a preset view of gender roles.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    As the perception of natural science and religious expression…

    • 2382 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ever since the end of the Middle Ages (which coincides with the beginning of the Protestant Reformation in the early 16th century), some Christians have had problems accepting the teachings of science. The origins of modern scientific thought go back to the Renaissance, when people rediscovered the teachings, art, and thought of the ancient Greeks and, of equal importance, began to see the importance of thinking for themselves, outside the restrictions of external authority structures.…

    • 14026 Words
    • 57 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Towne Summary

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mr. Towne’s explains that religion and science are coming more together, the more that people try to separate them. Also, that we should not try to stand in the way of something that is inevitable such as this. When trying to understand why people see them as being so different, they eventually prove that they are quite similar. He went on to say if we can look at the nature of them, then they are “almost indistinguishable” (Townes, 1966). Some people see them as different because of how they thought of them. People see science as more of an experiment…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Griffin, David Ray, Panentheism and Scientific Naturalism: Rethinking Evil, Morality, Religious Experience, Religious Pluralism, and the Academic Study of Religion, (Volume 2), Anoke, MN: Process Century Press, 2014.…

    • 2863 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this day and age the amount that religion is present in everyday life is very questionable. It seems that in the past few decades that religion has taken a back seat to science and other relevant things. All though religion has by no means been terminated, you could definitely say that it is not as practiced as it used to be. One study by the Barna Group for the American Bible Society found that Americans are losing interest in the Bible. In just one year, the number of people who said they read the Bible to be “closer to God” dropped 9 percentage points from 64% in 2011 to 55% in 2012. This is just one study that shows that Americans may be slowly be losing interest in religion.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Science verses Religion has been an ongoing debate all over the world for centuries. Depending on who one talks to about these topic will depend on the passion and beliefs one has. As we saw in the movie Angels and Demons all the major characters such as Robert Langdon, Camerlengo McKenna and the former pope had their own strong feelings and beliefs. Certain questions have been raised about these two topics that I will be elaborating on later in this essay such as, Is there room in the world for both, Can one render the other obsolete, and would I rather live in a world without science or religion? I find all these questions very interesting and interaging, just like the movie Angels and Demons.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays