Preview

Watson and Crick discovering DNA

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
363 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Watson and Crick discovering DNA
Watson and Crick discovering DNA
Watson and Cricks discovery of DNA was important for many reasons because DNA made it possible to use genetic screening to identify which patients have ‘faulty’ genes which will lead to genetic illness such as Alzheimer’s. Watson and Crick discovered the structure of DNA in 1953. A reason that it was important was because it has provided an explanation for diseases and conditions that the germ theory cannot explain, for instance, cancer. This was important because it meant that peoples understanding of the human body was furthered very much. This made medical progress possible because it gave doctors better understanding of the human body.
A reason that Watsons and cricks discovery of DNA was helped was by Franklins photo of DNA that she took using Crystallography, however franklin herself did not discover DNA and died before she could ever be credited for her work. This helped Watson and crick to get a head start on the competition and get a better overall understanding of DNA. This photo helped them to create a tin model of DNA; they used the photo to cross check all of their research.
Another reason that the discovery of DNA was important is because it made genetic engineering and screening possible. Genetic engineering could provide methods for preventing development of diseases which means people lives will become safer and better. Whereas genetic screening can be used to identify who is likely to develop certain diseases which is useful because it meant people could be treated for the illnesses that they have. Better treatments where made possible because doctors could identify what operations are needed and it made for better treatments for long term illnesses such as diabetes.
Another thing about Watson and cricks discovery meant that now one structure of DNA has been discovered, scientists were able to map out the entire genome which was a big step forward for science. Stem cell treatment made it possible to repair

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    2. What role did James Watson & Francis Crick play in our understanding of DNA’s structure? They discovered the 3D structure.…

    • 2542 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Advances in recombinant DNA technology allow scientists to work with smaller fragments of DNA, give them more tools to dissect and analyze DNA, and also allow for them to make many copies of a strand of DNA.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5. Given the state of knowledge at the time of Avery, Macleod, and McCarty experiment, why was it difficult for some scientists to accept that DNA is the carrier of genetic information?…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The role of DNA in heredity was first discovered by studying bacteria and the viruses that infect them.…

    • 1877 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Why do you think DNA has had such an impact on forensic science? It has allowed us to advance as a society, making it possible to serve justice.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pauling had stumbled when he was perceiving DNA to have three interwoven strands instead of two. I find it very interesting that if Watson and Crick had not also been working to discover the structure and Pauling had not caught that he made an error, then people might have thought that he was correct and we might have been learning in class about a whole different type of DNA. The structure would not be known as a double-helix because everyone would have thought it had three strands, and base pairing between nitrogen bases would look much different and I imagine probably more complex, as would the process of protein synthesis and DNA replication. In translation during protein synthesis, it would be much more complex to code for amino acids because more than one anticodon and tRNA molecule would be needed. Base pairing rules would be much more complex because there would need to be combinations of three complementary nitrogen bases instead of combinations of…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Forensic Science Module 7

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. I believe DNA has had and continues to have such an impact on forensic science because a DNA sample can help figure out who was involved in a crime and even who was the person who committed the crime.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, DNA can solve criminal cases.it could help police to investigate crimes some people think that DNA fingerprinting is very accurate, and it also is very sensitive and can be contaminated easily. But DNA test results are much clearer than fingerprints and it is with these results can proofs that it is possible…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deoxyribonucleic acid, also known as DNA contains genetic information and is found within the chromosome of human cells. After countless hours of research on thethis fairly new phenomenon it was Sir Alec Jeffereys of England who developed a technology that was based solely on DNA in 1985. DNA plays a major role in technology, it is used for identification, and it has been a leading source in identifying biological samples such as saliva, urine, blood, semen and hair. All of these samples have been extremely helpful with government, federal, state and even private agencies…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dna Synthesis

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1) Watson and Crick elucidated the structure of DNA in 1953. Their research built on and helped explain the findings of other scientists, including ________.…

    • 2444 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because Watson and Crick were the ones who lead the research to answer the DNA problem, they were awarded credit for the discovery even though there were many other scientists who contributed their skills and findings to the discovery. After Maurice and Rosalind Franklin, another scientist at Maurice's lab, read the paper that was to be sent to Nature, they objected that a scientist in their lab, referred to as Fraser, needed to be referenced because he "had considered hydrogen-bonded bases prior to [their] work." (128) Even if a scientist did not get equal credit for a discovery, they were given credit as far as the information that they contributed goes. A big exception in the case of giving out due recognition in the history of The Double Helix is that Rosalind's contribution to the discovery was not acknowledged nearly as much as it should have been, most likely because of the fact that she was a woman and science was a boy's club at the…

    • 1602 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Term Papper

    • 23605 Words
    • 95 Pages

    (D) an understanding of DNA is essential to making well-informed personal medical choices or to making good public policy decisions about health care…

    • 23605 Words
    • 95 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Iodine Paper

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2. The discovery of genetic material in DNA occurred in 1865. This allowed us to determine different traits in mammals. As well as how we can determine different traits, and the percent chance of obtaining these traits.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    DNA was named the transforming principle 1944. The scientist who made the breakthrough was Oswald Avery, an immunochemist at the Hospital of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research. Avery had worked for many years with the bacterium responsible for pneumonia, pneumococcus, and had discovered that if a live but harmless form of pneumococcus was mixed with an inert but lethal form, the harmless bacteria would soon become deadly. He collaborated with Colin MacLeod and Maclyn McCarty and began to a lot of bacteria. He noted that the substance did not look like a protein or carbohydrate but rather a nucleic acid, and with further analysis, it was revealed to be DNA. Avery's difficulty was no longer the transformation itself but to prove…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rosalind Franklin

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages

    X-ray crystallography helped determined the three dimensional structure of DNA when Franklin returned to England. She became the first person to find the molecule¡¯s sugar-phosphate backbone while working with a team of scientists at King¡¯s College in London. Unfortunately, leadership misunderstandings and personality conflicts depreciated Franklin¡¯s effectivness in the laboratory. Maurice Wilkins, the laboratory¡¯s second in command, returned from a vacation expecting Franklin to work under him. Franklin came to the laboratory with the understanding that she would be researching alone. While Franklin was direct and decisive, Wilkins tended to be alluding and passive-aggressive. As Franklin made further advances in DNA research, Wilkins secretly shared her findings with the famous duo of Watson…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics