Preview

Stop and Search Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
558 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Stop and Search Essay Example
Stop and Search Powers summary

The police often stop and search people which are suspected to have stolen or prohibited articles in possession. The power to do this comes from the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 which indicated “a constable may search a person or vehicle in public for stolen or prohibited articles” (Elliott and Quinn, 2011, 374). The police must follow a procedure when they are to stop and search a suspect. First of all they cannot stop and search at random; they must have reasonable grounds for the search. Before the search they must then identify themselves and the station they are based at as well as the grounds for the search. If the police officers do not do this the defendant can appeal on the basis that the search was unlawful as highlighted in the case R v Bristol where the search carried out under of the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 was unlawful given that it had not complied with the requirements under of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984. It followed that the defendant was not guilty of intentionally obstructing a search under the 1971 Act” (All England reporter, 2007)
The power to stop and search must also be used without unlawful discrimination. To discriminate is “to single out a particular person or group for worse or better treatment than others” (Collins English Dictionary, 2011, p 156) so the police cannot stop and search anyone because of their race or religion.
The police can use reasonable force to stop and search however they cannot make the suspect remove any other clothing than outer clothing in public. After the search the officer is required to write a record of the search. It use to be that the police had to record 12 different things but from March 2011 the requirements were changed to 7 to reduce bureaucracy and time. (Home Office 2011) The 7 things to be recorded by law are: • Ethnicity • Objectives of search • Grounds for search • Identity of officer carrying out the stop and search

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The year, 1984 saw the introduction of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act, also known as the PACE codes. The PACE codes were an act of parliment, the introduction of these codes was to standardise and proffessionalise police work. It basically provides a core framework of police powers and safeguards around stop and search, arrest, detention, investigation, identification and interviewing suspects. Official dissatisfaction with the rules of the criminal process goes back to the mid 1960's when the Home Office asked the Crimial Law Revision Committee to look into the rules of evidence in criminal cases. After their ill fated 11th Report the Home Office shelved the issue until 1977 when the labour government announced that it was to set up a Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, whose terms of reference were to consider the investigation of offences in the light of police powers and duties, aswell as the rights and duties of suspects. The Philips Commission was asked to examine the issues, " Regarding both the interests of the community in bringing offenders to justice and to the rights and liberties of the person accussed or suspected of crime." The Report was well recieved by the police and legal proffesion but not so well by the political left as it was said to be to prosecution minded. In November 1982 the Home secutary introduced the first ever version of the PACE Bill, the bill was highly contrivesal and didnt pass throught the house of commons until October 1984, when it had been subject to many government amendments. The question that remains is why was there a need for such an Act to be passed? As a group it is the stop and search aspect of the codes that we shall be analising, why there was a need for these measures to be in place, what its impact has been and what the code actually involves, aswell as a statistical analysis of the Act.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Can police stop a person without probable cause? Can police search a person stopped without probable cause?…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant's arrest if it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 at 351.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All citizens of the UK have the legal right to arrest another person. This right is given to the public by section 24 of the Police and Criminal evidence act, but it actually dates back far before this to medieval times and English common law.…

    • 5689 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Officer Smith could rely on the premise of “exigent circumstances” to permit her to search the personal effects of the suspect/victim for identification. But the car was stopped on probable cause for a broken tail light, not for suspected possession of drugs. The law states that when a person is stopped for reasonable suspicion or probable cause, the police can only search for objects related to the reason for the search without obtaining a search warrant (When is a Search Warrant Not Necessary?, n.d.). If there were a warrant in this case, Coolidge v. New Hampshire would apply and during the search for the items on the warrant police may also lawfully seize items that are incriminating (Roberson, Wallace, & Stuckey, 2013). This only applies, however, to searches involving warrants. Legal discovery of evidence without a warrant must involve plain view and must be inadvertent. The marijuana baggie was not in plain view. The suspect/victim was unable to give consent for her effects to be searched. The suspect/victim was not in a location to have control over the vehicle and its contents. The traffic stop was for a broken tail light and not suspicion of drug paraphernalia. There was no probable cause for the officer to suspect that marijuana was within the vehicle. Although the discovery was inadvertent, none of the other tests for warrantless search were met. Had Officer Smith smelled marijuana when she stopped the…

    • 1643 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hi There Essay Example

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2. Cells that are in the process of dividing are said to be in mitosis or cytokinesis. Cells that are not dividing are in interphase.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “Stop and Frisk” is a program put into effect by the New York Police Department that basically grants an officer authority to stop and search a “suspicious character” if they deem him/her to be as such. They don’t need a warrant, or see you commit a crime. 5They simply need to deem you “suspicious” to violate your 4th amendment rights without repercussions. Since its inception, New York City’s stop and frisk program has drawn much controversy stemming from the disproportionate rate of arrest. While the argument that the program violates an individual’s 4th amendment right of protection from unreasonable search and seizure could absolutely be made, that argument pales in comparison to the argument of discrimination. A disproportionate number of African Americans and Hispanics are unreasonably stopped and searched simply for looking suspicious. The original intention of this program was to reduce the level of crime (which it has) and to crack down on illegal weapons. It has now become an excuse for police to play with their authority and target innocent people.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Current law allows police officers to conduct stop and frisk searches of persons based on reasonable suspicion, as determined by Terry v. Ohio where supreme court decisions determined that individuals can be searched not only for probable cause (where an individual is under suspicion of committing a specific crime) but also for reasonable suspicion (where an individual is thought to be taking part in of have taken part of a crime, using facts and beliefs at hand which a reasonable inferences can be drawn from). In these instances, a pat down can be done only for the search of weapons for the preservation of the officers’ safety. The officer cannot manipulate objects not believed to be weapons in order to determine if they are other illegal substances (Minnesota v. Dickerson). Additionally the police need to notice something in your actions that makes you suspicious (Rogers v. Arizona). The police cannot stop a person because of protected status such as race, gender etc. When police are conducting an investigation, you have to cooperate with them or you might be arrested as well.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court rejected the defendants' arguments. The Court noted that stops and frisks are considerably less intrusive than full-blown arrests and searches. It also observed that the interests in crime prevention and in police safety require that the police have some leeway to act before full probable cause has developed. The Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement is sufficiently flexible to permit an officer to investigate the situation. The "sole justification" for a frisk, said the Court, is the "protection of the police officer and others nearby." Because of this narrow scope, a frisk must be "reasonably designed to discover guns,…

    • 1557 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 4th Amendment

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, if there was a probable cause to search that person because they were somehow involved, or an eyewitness identified their involvement while the crime was happening, a police officer could search them. If law enforcement came upon a scene where a crime was in progress, they could enter and search a location or person within the location of the crime in progress without violating that person’s fourth amendment rights.…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police are more likely to stop and search powers against black, Asian and mixed race people than white people in some parts of England. This is then showing that a racial inequality with police is an issue and should police be aloud to stop and search people if they have no evidence that they are creating an unrest to the community, or are black people victimised when it comes to the police stop and search powers.…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop and Frisk

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Current law allows police officers to conduct stop and frisk searches of persons based on reasonable suspicion, as determined by Terry v. Ohio where supreme court decisions determined that individuals can be searched not only for probable cause (where an individual is under suspicion of committing a specific crime) but also for reasonable suspicion (where an individual is thought to be taking part in of have taken part of a crime, using facts and beliefs at hand which a reasonable inferences can be drawn from). In these instances, a pat down can be done only for the search of weapons for the preservation of the officers’ safety. The officer can not manipulate objects not believed to be weapons in order to determine if they are other illegal substances (Minnesota v. Dickerson). Additionally the police need to notice something in you actions that makes you suspicious (Rogers v. Arizona). The police can not stop a person because of protected status such as race, gender etc. When police are conducting an investigation, you have to cooperate with them or you might be arrested as well (Hiibu v. Nevada).…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stop And Search Analysis

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The macro level is able to affect pre-emptive measures in the micro level which are promoted by the culture of fear from the government and support of the media. In order to prevent the risk of future terrorist attack, punitive pre-emption measurements were taken by recreating the exaggeration image of future attacks (Walklate and Mythen, 2014). Stop and Search in the UK were actually established in 1984 under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act which were formed due to the disorder in British cities. In 1994, under section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act police were allowed to carry out the activity randomly if they suspect there are commotions about to occur. It was argued that the use of stop and search…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The three statutory rights of arrest are preventative, breach of peace and public order. I don’t think a person should be arrested to stop them doing something as they have not committed a crime so the police should not have the right to arrest someone who has not yet committed a crime. However, breach of peace and public order are effective as it is arresting a person who is a danger to society as they have caused harm/fear to a victim.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    find essay

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Free Essays, Term Papers, Research Paper, and Book Report Free essays, research papers, term papers, and other writings on literature, science, history, politics, and more. Search Essays - Argumentative Essays - Abortion - FAQs 123helpme.com/ Free Essays Free Essays 1 - 20 - StudyMode.com Free Essays on Free Essays for students. Use our papers to help you with yours 1 - 20. www.studymode.com/ subjects/free-ess...…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays