S New Zealand/Aotearoa a Classless Society?
Introduction to Sociology and Community Development
CSTU 5110-2167
Lecturer: Dr Denys Delany
ESSAY
IS NEW ZEALAND/AOTEAROA A CLASSLESS SOCIETY? DISCUSS – IF SO WHAT DEFINES THIS STRUCTURE? – IF NOT WHAT IS THE MAIN BASIS OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN NEW ZEALAND/AOTEAROA?
Due date: 13th April 2007
Student Name: Ali Rankin Student ID: 1282990 Email: (ali_rankin@hotmail.com) Address: 49 Alfriston Road, Manurewa, Auckland Phone: 021 102 9454
I declare the following to be my own work, unless otherwise referenced, as defined by Unitec New Zealand’s policy on plagiarism.
This essay will argue that New Zealand/Aotearoa is not a classless society. Moreover, it will also be demonstrated that New Zealand is a stratified society of which class is only one part, and that gender is the basis of social stratification. This discussion will begin with a definition of some key terms. In determining that New Zealand is not a classless society, the historical definition of class will be examined and then developments in New Zealand’s society explored to ascertain the place class occupies in contemporary New Zealand society. At this point the discussion will revert to the position that gender is the dominant form of stratification and evidence will be provided to support this. Throughout the essay the effect of the industrial revolution will be explored as a mechanism that contributed to both class and gender consciousness. In concluding, an explanation of my own socially constructed perspective which has informed the position I have adopted will also be offered.
Before proceeding with this argument, it is first necessary to define two key terms used in discussing this topic: class and stratification. Stratification refers to the hierarchical organisation of groups within a society and the social inequality this produces (Jary & Jary, 2005). Stratification and
CSTU 5110-2167
Lecturer: Dr Denys Delany
ESSAY
IS NEW ZEALAND/AOTEAROA A CLASSLESS SOCIETY? DISCUSS – IF SO WHAT DEFINES THIS STRUCTURE? – IF NOT WHAT IS THE MAIN BASIS OF SOCIAL STRATIFICATION IN NEW ZEALAND/AOTEAROA?
Due date: 13th April 2007
Student Name: Ali Rankin Student ID: 1282990 Email: (ali_rankin@hotmail.com) Address: 49 Alfriston Road, Manurewa, Auckland Phone: 021 102 9454
I declare the following to be my own work, unless otherwise referenced, as defined by Unitec New Zealand’s policy on plagiarism.
This essay will argue that New Zealand/Aotearoa is not a classless society. Moreover, it will also be demonstrated that New Zealand is a stratified society of which class is only one part, and that gender is the basis of social stratification. This discussion will begin with a definition of some key terms. In determining that New Zealand is not a classless society, the historical definition of class will be examined and then developments in New Zealand’s society explored to ascertain the place class occupies in contemporary New Zealand society. At this point the discussion will revert to the position that gender is the dominant form of stratification and evidence will be provided to support this. Throughout the essay the effect of the industrial revolution will be explored as a mechanism that contributed to both class and gender consciousness. In concluding, an explanation of my own socially constructed perspective which has informed the position I have adopted will also be offered.
Before proceeding with this argument, it is first necessary to define two key terms used in discussing this topic: class and stratification. Stratification refers to the hierarchical organisation of groups within a society and the social inequality this produces (Jary & Jary, 2005). Stratification and
References: Conley, D. (2001). A room with a view or a room of one’s own? Housing and social stratification. Sociological Forum, 16(2), 263. Retrieved Saturday, march 17th, 2007 from the SocINDEX with full text database. Davis, L. & Jackson, N. (1993). Women’s labour force participation in New Zealand: The past 100 years. Wellington: Social Policy Agency. Day, G. (2001). Chapter 6: The twentieth century (pp. 154-204). Routledge. Retrieved Sunday, March 4th, 2007 from the SocINDEX with full text database. Else, A. (1997). Having it both ways? Social policy and the positioning of women in relation to men in Social Policy Journal of New Zealand, Issue 9. Garfunkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Giddens, A. (1997). Sociology (3rd Ed.) Cambridge, England: Polity Press. James, B., and Saville-Smith, K. (1989). Gender, culture and power. Auckland: Oxford University Press. Jary, D. & Jary J. (Eds.). (2005). Collins internet-linked dictionary of sociology (3rd Ed.). Glasgow: HarperCollins. McLennan, G., Ryan, A. & Spoonley, P. (2004). Exploring society: sociology for New Zealand students (2nd Ed.). Auckland: Pearson New Zealand Ltd. Morris, C. & Maisto, A. (2002). Psychology an introduction (11th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Osborne, R. & Van Loon, B. (2004). Introducing sociology. Crows Nest, NSW: Allen & Unwin Pty. Ltd. Robertson, F. (2001). Women’s issues in social work practice and policy development, in M. Connelly (Ed.), New Zealand Social Work: Contexts and Practice. Auckland: Oxford University Press. Saunders, P. (1990). A nation of home owners. London: Allen and Unwin. Stratification, class and status: The making of a class society. (2003). Retrieved Saturday, March 17th, 2007 from the SocINDEX with full text database.