Preview

Napoleon and Italian Unification Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
737 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Napoleon and Italian Unification Essay Example
To what extent was Napoleon III responsible for the unification of Italy?

Napoleon III's contribution to the unification of Italy was decisive but inadvertent. He and Cavour had no intention of unifying Italy; Cavour was interested in Piedmontese augmentation, while Napoleon was concerned to put French interests and his family before anything else. He had several reasons to help Cavour, none of which included his desire for a unified Italy. To a great extent, he was responsible for Italian unification. Count Cavour, the prime minister of Piedmont, carried out economic and industrial developments to try to rebuild Piedmont after the 1848-9 revolutions. He realized he could not expel Austria from Italy without foreign aid. He aimed to obtain such support from the likes of England and France. The British government was not willing to assist him, and he turned to Napoleon III. Cavour set out to win French support by launching extensive social reforms throughout Sardinia and by joining France in the Crimean War. Afterwards, Cavour met with Napoleon III to plan the liberation of Italy and to make sure he had military support. Cavour endeavored to win military support because he was preparing for a war with Austria. An agreement was made between France and Sardinia. Napoleon III saw this as an opportunity to strengthen Sardinia because it would be a troublesome neighbor for Austria. Piedmont was to pay for all French expenses, and Napoleon requested a marriage association between his family and that of the House of Savoy. It was also an opportunity to gain control of more land, as he was promised Nice and Savoy in return for his assistance. After a period of fighting, Napoleon had offered an armistice to Austria and peace would follow. Austria agreed to yield Lombardy to Piedmont. The treaty provided that the people of the Duchies of Tuscany, Parma, and Modena should return to their allegiance, but this was not possible without military force. The people were

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Ap Euro Study Guide

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Italian unification: Savoy- ruled Piedmont in N Italy = best hope for unification when lead by Count Camillo di Cavour prime minister to Victor Emmanuel II.…

    • 1541 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    i. The coalition offered final terms to the emperor: he could retain his throne, but France would be reduced to her normal frontiers.…

    • 3896 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A system of alliances between the ‘Great Powers’ of Europe had survived the wars of the Spanish and Austrian succession in the first half of the eighteenth century, but the French-Indian War forced a change. In the old system Britain was allied with Austria, who was allied with Russia, while France was allied with Prussia. However, Austria was chaffing at this alliance after the Treaty of Aix-la-Chapelle had ended the War of the Austrian Succession in 1748, because Austria had wanted to recover the rich region of Silesia, which Prussia retained. Austria therefore began, slowly, tentatively, talking with France.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fearing that they would lose power, many European countries worked together to crush the French Revolution to lower the possibility of uprisings in their own countries. Austria and Prussia were highly alarmed with the dethroning of the French monarchy, prompting them to urge the French to restore Louis XVI to power. As a result, the Legislative Assembly declared war on the allies. During Napoleon’s rule, Britain, Russia, Austria, and Sweden feared his ambitions to conquer all of Europe and allied against France.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Susan Muthan1

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In consort with the supporters, there were some anti-unification leaders. The Peace of Villafranca, treaty between France and Austria (1859) stated that conjoining the territories would be easy, but Emperor Napoleon III of France wrote that he did not want Italy to unify because the nation would diminish its preponderance. Though to many it seemed and obvious choice for unification, to these writer including Giuseppe Garibaldi, believed they were a monarchy in the first place for a reason. They thought that separate kingdoms and territories would be beneficial for everyone.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Contradicting opinions from his two closest advisors bombarded Napoleon. François de Barbé-Marbois – the impeccably honest finance minister – pushed toward a sale to raise money for a war with England. Charles-Maurice de Talleyrand-Périgord – Napoleon’s witty and corrupt chief advisor – pushed him to hold on to the colony, a position he believed held long-term benefits for France, if not for…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While France and England hoped to expand their empires. Everyone had a part in this,…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Napoleon Research Paper

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The transition of the urban development of Paris France towards the second empire- Napoleon lll…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Foreign support was vital to the Jacobites in both the rebellions of 1715 and 1745-46. Many British Jacobites based their participation in the rebellions on the arrival of foreign assistance. The French support for the rebellion of 1715 was hampered by the death of Louis XIV in 1714. The Duke of Orleans succeeded Louis XIV and with the 1713 Treaty of Utrecht still standing and his own designs on becoming heir-apparent the Duke needed peace and an understanding with Britain.1 France, in both the ‘15 and the ‘45 was always faced with more demands on its strengths than it could possibly meet. Only if the French strategists could see the exiled house of Stuart as a priority would support be forthcoming. James ordered his followers and sympathizers to do all they could to involve France and England, hoping for an intervention.2 The Spanish participated and aided the Jacobites during the latter stages of the 1715 rising. In late December a shipment of £15,000 of Spanish gold was despatched, but with luck not on the rebels side it was wrecked on the beach at St Andrews Bay.3 Similarly in the 1745-46 rising the French ship “Le Prince Charles” carrying funds was intercepted by the Royal Navy forcing Charles Edward into an early and fateful battle in April 1746.4 The lack of financial aid sounded the death knell to both rebellions. In the ‘45 it is thought that Louis XV had left his decision to commit himself to the cause far too late, holding back to find out how serious the rebellion in Scotland was.5 This unfortunate lack of foreign assistance was a key factor in the failure of the rebellions.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Napoleon valued order while he was in power. Order, security, and efficiency replaced liberty, equality, and fraternity. He restored the struggling economy by building new roads and canals, so it could be easier to transport goods or obtain them from other society's. He also set up a public school system and made peace with the Catholic Church by signing the Concordat of 1801. The Concordat of 1801 was an agreement between the Roman Catholic Church in France and Napoleon, for the French had been in disagreement with the Catholic Church since the revolution. The Third Estate (made up of peasants…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    based in Rome, losing influence over much of Northern Europe. Weakened, the various Italian city-states became vulnerable to conquest by Spain, France, and Austria. Italy remained a patchwork of principalities controlled through proxy by various European powers until the 19th century, when the French leader Napoleon supported the unification of Italy as a way of creating a buffer state against his many enemies. With the backing of France, Italian nationalist Giuseppe Garibaldi led a popular movement that took over much of Italy in 1861 and would be ending in 1870 with the fall of Rome and complete unification of the…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    An over-riding aim of Cavour's was to ensure that Piedmont became the leading Italian state, more powerful than all others in economy, trade and organisation of government. Cavour had the benefit of running an already forward-thinking and modern state. He saw this as an advantage and exploited it. Advancements in trade meant economic growth; free trading treaties with other countries saw a 30% rise in exports and 40% in imports. Reduction in the power of the Church, another of Cavour's aims, was sped up by the introduction of the Siccardi Laws. These stated several drastic alterations such as the new inability to seek refuge in the Church, as well as the abolishment of separate courts. This change in government was also all part of the new constitutional government that Cavour was maintaining. He attempted to reduce bureaucracy by centralising power and reducing the number of roles per job in government. Piedmont was also the only state to run by a constitution, the Statuto, that remained thanks to Austria following the 1848-9 revolutions. The benefit of already having these changes in place meant that Cavour simply had to maintain this positive attitude and take it forward.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. Maria Theresa made an alliance with the French kings after realizing that they were not Austria's biggest threat anymore. During Maria Theresa's reign, her main issues had been with Prussia.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nationalism was a key factor in building nations. Throughout the years Italians were growing impatient and dissatisfied under foreign rule. Count Cavour was responsible for the brains behind the unification of Italy. He believed that releasing the Italians from foreign rule would not only leave the country authoritative and superb but also supply the people with intelligence and knowledge (Doc. 3). Italian Nationalists looked up to the Kingdom of Piedmont-Sardinia because of their power over the Italian states. In 1848, the kingdom had adopted a liberal constitution. So to the middle class liberals, unification under Piedmont Sardinia was appealing. Giuseppe Garibaldi, the leader of army of nationalists, captured Sicily. After marching across the Italian mainland their was an agreement to let the Sardinian king rule. Like Italy, Germany achieved national unity around the same time. The Austrian Empire took over the German confederation; however, Prussia was prepared to unify them. Prussia had a mainly German empire. Therefore, nationalism truly unified Prussia. When Bismarck took control, he was a master of realpolitik. Bismarck’s method for uniting Germany was through blood and iron (Doc 5). He believed that the power of Germany should be allocated over all German People. In his eyes, war was the only option to achieving success.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Initially the Whites were in power, so they expelled the Blacks. In response, Pope Boniface VIII planned a military occupation of Florence. In 1303, Charles of Valois, who was the brother of King Philip IV of France, was to visit Florence because he was appointed peacemaker by the Pope. It was believed that Charles of Valois had received other unofficial instructions, so the council sent a delegation to Rome to ascertain the Pope's intentions. Dante was one of the delegates.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays