Preview

Louis Xvi and Xviii Absolute Power Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
416 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Louis Xvi and Xviii Absolute Power Essay Example
King Louis XVI and Lous XVIII are both brothers.

They were both pretty extravagent, and they were the absolute monarchy. That's why the French Kings were known as the Sun Kings.

The French Kings had supreme authority. Examples are King Louis XIV declared himself as the state which in 1787 King Louis XVI proclaimed whatever he said was the law.

They had absolute power. So King Louis XVI wanted to remain all-powerful, he didn't like how he lsot power during the French Revolution so attempted to flee with Marie Antoniette from his palace in France (The Tuileries) so he tried to flee in 1791 and join the emigres (the exiled nobles with an army).

King Louis XVIII orignally opposed King Louis XVI but lated sided with him because he kenw the French revolution would drain theirt families power. So both wanted to be the supreme power, so they actually fully supported abso;lute monarchyu and it's policies. Both suppored the clergy and the nobility. Don't forget the Court of Versailles to support this point as well.

They ruled in divine right, had the church's support and a backing of an army of beurecrats. Divine right is where a king rules from gods order. In china, such things like the mandate of heaven were needed for a king or queen to rule with divine right.

Louis XVI (23 August 1754 – 21 January 1793) was a Bourbon monarch who ruled as King of France and Navarre until 1791, and then as King of the French from 1791 to 1792. Suspended and arrested as part of the insurrection of 10 August during the French Revolution, he was tried by the National Convention, found guilty of high treason, and executed by guillotine on 21 January 1793 as a desacralized French citizen known as "Citoyen Louis Capet". He is the only King of France ever to be executed.

Although Louis XVI was beloved at first, his indecisiveness and conservatism led some elements of the people of France to eventually view him as a symbol of the perceived tyranny of the Ancien Régime and gave

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    1 Sarah Seng History 130 Chapter 15 Summary April 23, 2018 This chapter beings with a tale about the Marquis of Canillac who did not have a good reputation in the land. Because of his reign, he was able to collect taxes on special occasions, but abused this privilege by collecting taxes annually. This ruler was influenced by Louis XIV and his extremely long reign.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For Louis XIV, achieving religious unity in France was of major concern as it was a challenge to his absolutism. Being a devote Catholic, Louis wanted to unite France under Catholicism as the presence of other unorthodox religions meant that Louis was not supported in every way, like an absolute King should be. Many, including Louis, saw the King of France to be ‘The Most Christian King’, and so, in order to comply with this, achieving religious unity would be essential. Throughout his reign Louis XIV attempted to persecute other religious groups within France such as the Huguenots, Jansenists and the Quietists, his success and the consequences in doing so effectively decided his overall success in achieving unity.…

    • 995 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He collected taxes without the consent of the estates general in order establish many things, fund a series of wars, build a bigger and stronger military and to build his palace, the Palace of Versailles, when it was built he insisted that the nobles spend more time there (Doc 2). This eventually led the nobles into debt because they spent most of their time and money at the Palace of Versailles. The nobles being in debt meant that they lost status and power, which ultimately fed the basis for the French Revolution. Document 3 states; “The aftermath of the revocation was disastrous for France. Many of those who abjured [gave up] their Protestant religion repented of their weakness.”(Doc 3) This demonstrates that the removal of the Edict of Nantes drove people insane because it granted the people France substantial rights, however when the rights were removed by Louis XIV people became infuriated, which is another reason to why the French Revolution occurred. Fundamentally, the actions that Louis XIV took had a great impact towards his people. His actions ultimately led the people of France initiate the French Revolution, which left France and its people at a vulnerable…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XIV was a man of strength and courage with many ambitions that he was fully determined to achieve. He dedicated most of his rule taking steps to accomplish the goal of “one king, one law, one faith” for the country of France. By one king he aimed for the ruler to have supreme power over armies, government bureaucracy, and culture. This would eventually lead to the overall influence of the French upon other countries and their kings. By way of one law he aspired for the nobles to no longer rule over separate states but for one government with supreme power. King Louis had a desire for an absolute monarchy. As a result he would not be legally bound by any institutions or other persons in the country. This inclination was not easily met or as successful as he had hoped. Louis XIV sought religious unity between the French people, one faith. To do this he revoked the Edict of Nantes. King Louis XIV did not achieve his entire goal to the extent which he had anticipated but overall he was victorious, leaving a huge impact and influence on the French society and Europe as a whole.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    An Absolute Monarchy was a new concept to the people of France during the 1600’s. Other forms of government were failing from lack of control, so the people of France turned to an Absolute Monarch, named Louis XIV. The only problem with Louis was that he was self-centered, and did not care a whole lot about governing his kingdom. He was more concerned with making himself looking good, and even went as far to call himself the “Sun God.” As a result, the French common people lived very rough lives, due to the neglect of their king. It was not an easy life for the French people under King Louis XIV’s rule, and it was not made better by his view on governing. This is shown through his lack of genuine care for his people, over taxation, and wars of the time.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When The King Took Flight

    • 1255 Words
    • 4 Pages

    King Louis XVI’s failed escape upset many people because they had invested so much trust and affection for him. Despite his indecisiveness, chubbiness, and lack of royal grace, they respected him and therefore tolerated his flaws. On June 23 for instance, Louis stood by the nobility and denounced the existence of the National Assembly, but many patriots forgave him and instead blamed his advisors. The French still respected their king and thus forgave him despite his denial of the National Assembly. Instead, they shifted the blame from Louis to his advisors and this provided him with a chance to redeem himself, which he did. At the Festival of Federation, Louis swore to abide by the National Assembly’s constitution. In response, people rejoiced knowing that with the support of the monarch, the Revolution is ensured to succeed (37). He easily won back the love of his people with this act.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    French Revolution Dbq

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    King Louis XVI was opposed to the 3rd Estates perspective of the situation. He believed he could repay his debt with heavy tax increases, Nobility and Clergy also…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the later portion of the 1600’s, the monarchial systems of both England and France were changing. England strayed away from an absolute monarch and ran toward a mightier parliament instead. The opposite was occurring in France as Louis XIV strengthened his own office while weakening the general assembly of France, the Estates General. Absolutism, the political situation in which a monarch controls makes all political, social, economic, and cultural decisions in a government without checks or balances, had been introduced by Charles I and James I. However, it never took hold. In France, Louis XIV took absolutism to extremes, claiming to be a servant of God. A limited monarch, England’s monarchial system, is a government in which a monarch…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    France from 1643 ­ 1715 C.E were both considered as very strong rulers who would do what it…

    • 823 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Louis XIV’s age of Absolutism is evidently shown in the film “The Man In The…

    • 819 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Even with the accomplishments of previous kings like William the Conqueror and Henry II, England’s later kings like Poor John could not live up to the strength of his predecessors. On the other hand, France was the complete opposite, their kings only became stronger as the lineage went on. All of England’s and France’s shared methods gained each kingdom more power and so did the different methods. But there was one category which France took advantage of that England did not even consider. This category was gaining the support of the people. Tactics like ending serfdom, and creating a standing army forced France’s people to love the king and sustained their absolute monarchy, but power-hungry English kings mostly focused on themselves which resulted in the increase in power for themselves but the resentment of the people. The final straw was the weakness of John, England’s people took advantage of their own king’s weakness and completely shifted the way that their government had worked by creating Parliament, which resulted in England’s limited monarchy. In the end, it didn’t come down to which king used more different methods to gain power or used similar methods more effectively, it came down to who was better at keeping their people happy and France…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Louis XVI took power when his father, who was the previous ruler, died. Many people did not agree with this because he as a young man at the time and had no experience running a country. King Louis XVI enjoyed the riches that came with being King but he did not have any experience and made random decisions that hurt the common people of the country which made France a target for other countries. King Louis XVI did not know what he was doing, obviously, but he controlled everything. The French people had no say in how their country was ran because the King paid no attention to them. France wanted him executed. Document F shows an image of when King Louis XVI was killed by the guillotine. The image also shows Maximilien Robespierre, another inspiring figure of the American Revolution, holding the king’s head while everybody else was happy and laughing as it was an enjoyable event. This event happened on January 21, 1793 long after King Louis XVI started ruling, so France was still incredibly poor.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Louis XIV had complete absolutism because he had the divine right to rule. He thought god single handedly chose him to rule over france.Every finance,graces of any type,ect had to go thru him and had to get his approval and so he knew everything that was going on. He also had no checks and balances…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. King Louis XIV is definitely the perfect example of an absolute monarch. An absolute monarch is a ruler that possesses all of the power and Louis XIV was the most powerful king in all of French history. He took away power from nobility while also giving power to government agents with whom he checked in regularly with. This was a way to guarantee that he would not lose his own power. He did not have to take orders from anyone. He also believed that he and the state were the same, meaning that Louis XIV had total control over how France was governed.…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nationalist perspective of King Louis XIV is that the head of the country is the nation and for society to prosper the people have to be willing to serve and follow the leader’s will. The source’s perspective can be shown throughout history by the beliefs and values he had during his reign in France. The source believed in the uses of a social hierarchy and the absolute monarch. The social hierarchy benefited the people who were part of the Roman Catholic Clergy or nobility. These people received privileges and were not required to pay taxes. The rest of the population had a difficult and challenging way of living. They were required to serve the king by paying taxes which lead to poor living conditions, in which some died from starvation. The absolute monarch allowed all the power in France to be consolidated in the hands of the king. This allowed for King Louis XIV to be the main voice in France and gave the power to decide how the country will operate. These ideals were the main contributions to start of the French Revolution, many people felt that they deserved better rights which lead the nation members to revolt and seek a better constitution. The source would disagree with J.D Vance’s idea to bridge the gap between the rich and poor. King Louis XIV would believe that he should not have to…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays