Preview

How Should Goverments Deal with Terrorism ? Essay Example

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
385 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
How Should Goverments Deal with Terrorism ? Essay Example
How should governments deal with terrorism ?

These are three key pieces of edvice for any government facing a terrorist threat.

1. Advice
In a terrorist threat the government should control the media and censor what the media show to the people. So that the people would not be scared and live in chaos.

Evidence
On July 7th 2005 a bombing occurred in London, The british government restricted what photos the media released to the people. There were no photos of dead bodies. This is because the government does not want people to worry about the bombing as much. If the media showed limbless bodies people would be scared and horrified. This is an example of censorship being used to not cause panic among the people.

2. Advice
If the government uses harsh methods towards captured terrorists and then the terrorists would think twice before they would do a attack.

Evidence
In 1605 after Guy Fawkes tried to blow up the parlament he was captured and killed in a very brutal way. This was done to set an example for other terrorists like Guy Fawkes.

3. Advice
If the terrorist demands are accpetable a government could listen to what their saying and try come to some good solution so everybody would be happy.

Evidence
Nelson Mandela is a good example because he was fighting for black peoples rights even though the government did not listen to him at first because they thought that black people should be a lower race of people but after a while there was a lot of strikes going on and the government started thinking about releasing Nelson Mandela and negotiating with him, the results of these negotiation led to the abolition of apartheid in South Africa

If a man killes somebody by a bombing he is a terrorist and for killing you should be sent straight to jail for the rest of the convicts life without questioning. So I think if every terrorist would be sent to jail for the rest of his life then there would be less terrorist in the world because

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    If a terrorist ever did intend on terrorising our country, there would be more plausible methods for them to carry out their action. It would only be natural to assume that they would be associated with a larger organisation, possess large amounts of money and be well-connected to the underground, allowing them to travel more comfortably in a plane rather than travel meaninglessly and unnecessarily on an expensive and unstable boat…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Compare and contrast the pre and post 9/11 law enforcement response to terrorism. What strategies could be implemented to increase future law enforcement capability in countering terrorism?…

    • 3281 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Governments do not respond well to terrorism, many have a policy of not negotiating with terrorists under any circumstances.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One prime example of this is during the 1960's Civil Rights Movement. Charismatic leaders such as Martin Luther King Jr. peacefully influenced American politics and ultimately brought about the Civil Rights Act of 1964 which disallowed discrimination of minorities in public places. This movement positively impacted our society which was based on the idea and principle that "all men are created equal". This philosophy was what drove many of the more recent peaceful resistances…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Some people use Terrorism, the use of fighting in pursuit of governmental aims, in order to obtain political change. In the book “The anatomy of Terrorism” by David E. Long, he explains that normally “the victims are not the real target to the terrorist attacks-that is the governing authorities the terrorists are seeking to intimidate”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Neck Torture

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Growing up in America many of us would agree that torturing someone is extremely cruel and should not be performed on anybody. However, given the right circumstances I believe that it in some cases torturing someone should be carried out to those who deserve it such as terrorists. It is obvious that terrorists do not care about others rights so why should they deserve theirs. Why should such criminals who are willing to shoot and blow up many harmless people for no reason have the right to voice their opinion on being handled fairly? Individuals who are capable of committing such horrendous crimes should not be entitled to have a say on how to be treated. I feel that torturing these kinds of people would hopefully give them a taste of their own medicine and…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maintaining and creating happiness among the whole is more important just the happiness of a person. If that is the case then wouldn’t torturing the terrorist be the right thing to do? Torturing him would make the world a more peaceful place and also letting…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the federal government preoccupies itself with fighting foreign terror, it must not neglect the terror that Americans can inflict on one another at home. In the aftermath of the Boston Marathon attack, America can learn a few vital lessons on how to prevent future attacks. One important tool that can be used in preventing future attacks is surveillance. Suspected terrorists need should be looked into and watched thoroughly, including their past history and their internet history. The United States also needs to take advice from other countries on possible terrorist threats.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One example of this is Martin Luther King and his quest for blacks rights. Martin Luther King was the leader of the African-American Civil Rights Movement in the United States aiming to eradicate racial discrimination against the black Americans. The black Americans were unfairly treated by the white Americans, not being allowed to use the same bathrooms, the same buses, sit in the same restaurants and many were slaves and servants for the whites. Yet, even though black Americans were usually disregarded and mistreated - usually put in jail for speaking up or confronting a white American, King was not afraid to speak up. King had once said "Human progress is neither automatic nor inevitable... Every step toward the goal of justice requires sacrifice, suffering, and struggle; the tireless exertions and passionate concern of dedicated individuals", he was willing to sacrifice his life for the younger generations to come. He was willing to protest against the injustice occurring to his own race in hope of equality in the future. Rose Parks also was another black American who…

    • 1023 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On September 11, 2001, our fellow citizens, our way of life, our very freedom came under attack in a series of deliberate and deadly terrorist acts. On this day, our nation united, determined to obliterate the evil force of terrorism from the planet Earth. Now, just eight years later, these same people wish to pardon the acts of evil, disregarding the 2,995 deaths that they united to avenge just a few years before. So the question lies before us; do we hunt down and punish those responsible for these cowardly acts, or do we ignorantly allow terrorist to revenge the freedoms our founding fathers worked so hard for? Because of the threat caused by terrorist on the United States of America, her citizens should continue to thwart the terrorists’ threats both at home and abroad.…

    • 2975 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Domestic terrorism is a matter not to be ignored. Society needs to take this issue into account. Americans should not have to worry about their lives. While the proponents of domestic terrorism claim that hate groups based in the U.S. have the means and the will to mount a terrorist attack, the contenders of domestic terrorism state that the biggest threat comes from an attack from outside the U.S.…

    • 680 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Counterterrorism Policy

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nevertheless, these are frequently cited terrorist incidents. In reality, “terrorist groups achieved their main policy objectives only three out of forty-two times—a 7 percent success rate” (cited in Abrahms, 2006: 51). Attacking civilians, ultimately, does not improve the chances of terrorism forcing political authorities into compliance. The contention is that attacking civilians miscommunicate the terrorist’s policy objectives (Abrahms, 2006: 56). A terror group's communication strategy breaks down when they demand hostile and unwavering maximalist objectives, such as declaring the eradication of entire societies. Governments are not going to forgo their political and social structures due to intimidation caused by attacking civilians; this…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benjamin Kuipers, PhD, Professor, Computer Sciences, University of Texas at Austin The following three essays discuss the causes and cures for terrorism. They were written at particular points in time and include references to specific events, but the principles they describe are timeless, I believe. “How to Defeat Terrorism” was written in May 2004, at a time when the U.S. occupation of Iraq could see no light at either end of the tunnel. “Identifying Terrorists as a Diagnosis Problem” was written in December 2002 as a critique of the proposed “Total Information Awareness” program. It has been lightly edited to remove references to TIA, since many people have forgotten it. “The Seeds of War (a parable)” was written shortly after 9/11. In all three essays, I highlight tempting courses of action that not only won’t work but which would make things much worse. Do you remember learning to ride a two-wheeled bicycle? First you learn to steer, to turn the bike in the direction you want to go. Then, you learn what to do when the bike starts to lean over. Since you want to go back upright, there is an irresistible temptation to steer towards where you want to be. Do this, and you’re flat on the ground in an instant. The hard part about learning to ride a bike is learning to do just the opposite: to steer into the lean. Then, the bike picks itself right up and you can stay balanced. Your first instinct is exactly wrong. You have to learn to overcome that instinct and do the opposite in order to ride a bike. It’s much the same with fighting terrorism.…

    • 4682 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    According to Bengt (2010) the politics should encourage the happiness principle, which consist strong moral values such as maximizing the happiness and minimizing the suffering. By torturing a person, politician will minimize the value of happiness. Utilitarianism theory states that society must promote happiness for everyone, minimizing the harm from the different actions. Authors of this theory, Bentham and Mill say that morally best alternative or solution is that, which requires no sufferings and making a big amount of people happy. If to apply to case that we are considering, it seems that the only right decision in this situation is a proper talk with terrorist. Since sometimes terrorists use these talk to say or do something that will provoke the administration, all the safety issues must be completed (Bufacchi & Arrigo, 2006). Utility here is people, who are in these buildings with a bomb, and sometimes we should sacrifice something in order to get to happiness and good consequences, which means that in accordance with utilitarianism theory, politician can protect those, who are not in these buildings right now. Only 35% of people are usually rescued in such situations with terrorists (BBC,…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    11. Truth is a rare commodity despite the freedom by the print and electronic media…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays