Preview

History and Development of the Sixth Amendment Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1061 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
History and Development of the Sixth Amendment Essay Example
Muthu S. Weerasinghe Constitutional Law LS 305 – 01 Unit 7 Essay

The Sixth Amendment of the Bill of Rights contains seven clauses that protect the rights of the accused. The amendment assures the accused that “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.” (U.S. Const. Amend. 6) One of the most important parts of this amendment is the right to counsel. The right to counsel guarantees the accused is provided with an attorney who is both competent and well – versed in the law. In this day and age, even the defendants that cannot afford counsel are provided with public defenders. The history of the Sixth Amendment can be traced back to English law, where defendants did not have a right to hire counsel to defend themselves, unless the circumstances were extraordinary. Subsequent to the 1688 Glorious Revolution (in England), English Parliament allowed only those accused of treason to be represented by counsel at proceedings. It wasn’t until 1836, when the Prisoner’s Counsel Act was passed, that the right to counsel was withheld from defendants. ("Right to counsel," 2008) Once the colonies in America were established, most of the American law remained rooted in English law and continued the practice of denying counsel to defendants, although the laws varied depending on the colony. Close to the end of the Revolutionary war in America, the right to represent and the right to counsel was widely regarded as a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    6th Amendment guarantees you a speedy trail, an impartial jury, that the accused can comfort the witnesses against them, and must be allowed a…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The case of Escobedo V. Illinois set the precedent for the sixth amendment, which is the right to a counsel. It guaranteed that if a person is arrested then they must be informed of their legal rights, which gives them the right to remain silent. When Danny Escobedo was arrested in connection for the shooting of one of his relatives he received an 18-hour interrogation and was later released for not making any self-incriminating statements. Another suspect was later arrested and told police that Escobedo had committed the murder. He was then once again arrested and this time interrogated through the entire night. His attorney had been repeatedly denied permission to talk to his client. Escobedo as well had repeatedly asked to see his lawyer…

    • 306 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Alabama, and overruled Betts v. Brady, which allowed selective application of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel to the states, itself previously binding only in federal cases. Instead, the court held that the right to the assistance of counsel was a fundamental right, essential for a fair trial, thereby emphasizing the procedural safeguards which were needed for due process of law. In this sense, the court ruled specifically that no one, regardless of wealth, education or class, should be charged with a crime and then be forced to face his accusers in court without the guidance of counsel. All of the other justices concurred in the judgment.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    In 1963, the Supreme Court ruled in Gideon v. Wainwright that the Sixth Amendment guarantees every defendant, regardless of socioeconomic status, the right to an attorney and equal protection under the court of law. This means that an indigent defendant that cannot afford to hire a private attorney may have a public defender appointed to him or her. However, fifty years later, the promises of Gideon v. Wainwright may remain unfulfilled. Public defenders may not be able to provide the same treatment to their clients as a private attorney, resulting in harsher sentences being placed on indigent defendants. This is clearly not the equal treatment that Gideon sought, and it is rather evident that the public defender system is very flawed.…

    • 2715 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Amendment Six: Case Study

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first clause of Amendment Six is the speedy trial clause. There are several reasons that this clause is positive to the accused in a case on trial. Primarily the right to a speedy trial can prevent undue and oppression, and minimize the anxiety and concern that accompanies public accusation. A speedy trial can limit the possibility that long delay will impair the ability of an accused to defend himself. Furthermore, delaying a trial is can tamper with the evidence and witnesses because over time evidence can lose value and witnesses could forget what happened at the the crime scene or even die before the trial takes place. The right of a speedy trial can also be in opposition to the interests of the accused because it can cause the accused…

    • 1701 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Alabama are a clear statement of the importance of the defendant’s right to counsel in a criminal proceeding. The right to counsel has been the source of much controversy within the U.S. law over the past decades. However, in the light of the words of Justice Sutherland, the failure of the trial court to appoint counsel was found a denial of due process. The Powell case holding declared that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment required that state courts give defendants an opportunity to obtain counsel for defendants in all capital cases who are not able to afford one and an attorney free of charge in noncapital…

    • 1666 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The sixteenth amendment in article I, section 8 gives congress the power to impose and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration. In article I, section 9 states that no direct could be imposed unless made proportion to the population based on census result, which means congress has to levy taxes based on the state population rather than individual. During the civil war the federal government imposed an income tax for individual to pay tax for war expenses; the supreme court found this to be unconstitutional based on the case of Pollock v. farmer’s Loan & trust co. (1895). After this case congress sent to the states the sixteenth amendment which gives congress the power to impose direct tax, that is, congress fixes the amount of income it wants to raise and levies each state with their proportionate share of the amount, a direct tax can be collected by federal officials or the states; state can collect their taxes in any way they want. In nutshell, a direct tax is collected only on persons or property. Indirect taxes are not being used in the constitution. It is simply a label for all duties, imposts and excises taken as a group, and is usually referred to any tax which is not direct. Though it has often been disputed that a uniform tax is one, which shows fundamental equality, the Supreme Court has constantly rejected this disagreement. The main purpose of allowing indirect taxes to be uniform is to secure the law of no taxation without representation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Miranda vs. Arizona

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that the prosecution could not introduce Miranda's confession as evidence in a criminal trial because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination. The police duty to give these warnings is compelled by the Constitution's Fifth Amendment, which gives a criminal suspect the right to refuse "to be a witness against himself," and Sixth Amendment, which guarantees criminal defendants the right to an attorney.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Let me take you back to one of the darkest days in American history. Monday April 5th, 2013 in Boston Massachusetts two men by the names of Tamerlan Tsarnaev and Dzhokhar Anzorovich Tsarnaev partook in an act of terror on US soil. Two trash can bombs were planted nearby the finish line of the annual Boston Marathon, and the damage these bombs did will forever live in infamy. After the attack, a man hunt through the streets of Boston took place tracking down the men who had commit a mass crime and an act of pure evil. The first of the two brothers, Tamerlan Tsarnaev, was shot when he was found; however, the second brother was later captured and taken into custody. Now here lies the question, what punishment is appropriate for someone who committed an act of terror, killing three and injuring over 200…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The job of a criminal defense attorney is so important that it was even written in the U.S. Constitution, cited in the Sixth Amendment that any citizen who is charged with a crime shall have the right to be represented by counsel. This is why, when charged with a crime, you must seek out the best criminal defense attorney you can for your defense.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Criminal law by nature is interesting to most people. However, there are many citizens that misinterpret what their rights are in a court of law. For instance, the Fifth amendment is a person’s right to not self-incriminate. Defendants typically do not address the court directly. They do so through they attorney. Attorneys are “responsible for advising their clients of their right to testify, whether or not it is wise to do so, as ell as the strategic implications of that decision” (Stock, 2015, p. 712). Just because a defendant does not testify on their own behalf, should not presume guilt. The sixth amendment stipulates that a defendant has the right to an attorney and to a jury trial. This is the premise where miranda rights come into play.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Colb, S.F. (2008 May 28). Hearsay, the Sixth Amendment, and Framers’ intent: The U.S.…

    • 655 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Essay On 8th Amendment

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The government has laid out an array of civil rights to protect the liberties of the people with the induction of the United States Bill of Rights in 1791. The large majority of these amendments are appropriate and remain prominent in the modernized American governmental system but these basic human rights carry substantial controversy, the most arguable being the eighth. This amendment states that there shall be no cruel or unjust punishments inflicted upon any individual remaining in the borders of the nation, whether long term resident or briefly visited foreigner. This amendment receives most of its discussion through conversation regarding the death penalty to the detained. In many opinions, lethal injection is supported as fully…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On 1st Amendment

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    I am writing about the 1st amendment in this project.I am in the view of a lawmaker so I have to chose the best one for my prospective as of a law maker.And I thought the 1st amendment was the best. Also my team chose to Canada as our country where we are making are laws, but we only got to chose 5 amendments.We pick the 1st of course, the 3rd ,the 4th ,the 5th ,and the 8th.We have one teacher two lawmakers and 2 citizens in our group.To learn more keep on reading.…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Right to Counsel

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Sixth Amendment gave the right to counsel but only people who could afford an attorney could hire one. Thus, a large population of people was left to defend themselves at a great disadvantage for many of them were uneducated or had other issues that prevented them from getting a fair trial. The first major incremental case to impact the right to counsel was Powell v. Alabama, 287 U.S. 45 (1932).…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays