Preview

Fanon: the Relationship Between Colonizer and Colonized Essay Example

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1272 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Fanon: the Relationship Between Colonizer and Colonized Essay Example
Samantha Steerman
ANTH 428
Fanon Essay
Due: January 23, 2012
First Draft

The relationship between the colonizer and the colonized is rocky at best. No one understands this dualism more than someone who is on both sides. Frantz Fanon was a man who wrote for the interest of the colonized, yet had experiences from both perspectives. Fanon was a man of mixed races who grew up understanding a life of privilege in France. Studying psychiatry, he had a unique perspective on the relation the colonized and the colonizer. Due to his past position as a psychiatrist in a hospital that treated colonized people dealing with the devastating effects of colonization, he had some rather strong positions on this relationship. This position led Fanon to write “Wretched of the Earth”, a piece which advocates a call to violence by the colonized. Fanon’s position is that because the physiological effects are so negative from being colonized, a revolution must happen. This revolution (decolonization) must be violent. It is the only way decolonization can be successful. The physiological effects of colonization can be devastating. As seen throughout history, the colonizer often demands integration at the very least of the people they are attempting to colonize. In many cases, total annihilation of the people that the colonizer is attempting to colonize occurs. In the United States, we have examples of both. Native Americans were both assimilated into white culture, and they were also blatantly killed in Indian wars for their lands. Although there can be some positive effects from colonization, the overwhelming majority would be considered negative. Fanon could not agree with this more. In his piece titled, “The Wretched of the Earth”, Fanon talks explicitly about the economic position of the colonized. He describes their physical world as being “a disreputable place inhabited by disreputable people... It is a world with no space; people are piled on top of one

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine waking up one morning to find that you are in a completely unfamiliar place. First, there were a few new neighbors, then more and more foreigners came along and now your whole town seems foreign. All the local shops are bought by corporations and the old ways of life have been altered. This is the well-known matter called colonization, which is the action or process of settling among and establishing control over the indigenous people of an area. Gary Pak does a fantastic job of displaying this subject within his story, “The Watcher of Waipuna.” The story brings up a concern about whether or not colonization is healthy and or necessary, for natives and for foreigners. Works of literature including: “The Watcher of Waipuna” by Gary Pak,…

    • 1616 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    But also it led to prosperity also the forming of a new country and a new power in the world. Zinn in his “A People's History of The United States” talks about how when the Europeans found the land they thought to be deserted and ready for the taking was already taken and full of life. The life hes talking about are the Indians who have lived in this new world for centuries and it in fact was their home. But no matter the Europeans took the land killed the Indians without so much as a thought of what the progress they were making cost. The price that the Indians had to pay was a deadly price,the price of their life the price of their freedom and the biggest of all was the changing of their way of life in a drastic and negative matter. The French the English the Dutch and the Spaniards all took colonies in the new world for their own and in doing so destroyed the lives of millions of Indians who in fact came first and had more of a right to the land than the Europeans themselves did. There was also a by-product of colonialism, Zinn says and that’s the product of slavery, slavery of the Indians but more so of the Africans . What Zinn is really talking about is the slave trade which came about because of colonialism and the Lack of “man power” in the new world to harvest new found cash crops such as tobacco and indigo. So…

    • 1576 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By the eve of the Revolution, the colonists had developed a strong sense of unity as Americans. Many events leading up to the American Revolution had been responsible for a small part of uniting the coloists together as Americans. One of the first visible steps was the French and Indian War (0). Especially after the embarassing failure of Braddock's battle, Britain's strong and invincible image was shattered in the eyes of the colonists. The war also bolstered colonial self-esteem, and united the American peoples when they discovered that they were all Americans who spoke the same language and shared common customs. This began to break down the barriers between the colonies (118).…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1) Colonization has been prevalent since the age of mankind, likewise with economics. The economics of the world heavily correlates to the pattern of colonization that swept across the globe in the 1700’s. In the eyes of colonizers, their duties were strictly to enlighten the people of these univillied nations while retrieving goods to take back to their people. Going to places like Africa and Asia, natural resources were abundant, so colonizers felt as if taking these goods were not a disservice to the natives, but rather they were spreading the wealth to themselves. For example, the Spanish robbed the Americas of their “gold, spices, cotton palm oil their timber”(p39) all while redirecting the wealth back to Europe. Many colonizers failed to realize the century long ramifications they would create. Conversely, the natives were extremely aware that they were oppressed, attacked and abused.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In post colonialism, Fanon mentioned that the mentality of colonized people has inferiority complex. The colonized people has inferiority feeling that they feel lower than the other. Fanon refers that the higher educated blacks, the inherent inferiority of themselves would be more intense. This inferiority complex is reflected in black whom do not want to speak their native language with their fellow citizen.…

    • 204 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many causes of the conflicts that occurred between white settlers and Native Americans. The Europeans who came to the New World in the early years of their exploration found native people who had a complex civilization with a very different culture than the Europeans did. With the clash of these two cultures, conflict was inevitable. Each culture fought to keep theirs alive and dominant. One major cause of conflict was broken treaties and promises with the settlers. This caused a lot of anger on each side. Along with broken treaties, constant invasion on one another’s land was another major cause of the conflicts. Lastly, unfair treatment and trade negotiations were also helping the fights continue. In conclusion, the conflict between Colonists and Indians was due to the Colonists huge greed for power and land.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Government in the colonies represented an extension of the English government. Courts enforced the common law of England. The Governor's Council or the Governor's Court was a body of senior advisers to the appointed royal Governor in each province.…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the colonial era European emigrants had a dramatic influence on the native people living on the North American continent. Previous to the arrival of the colonists the native people had enjoyed their own culture, customs and way of life. Many lived in smaller settlements spread far apart across the American continents. In their culture the men hunted for game while the women played the role of farmers. The men in comparison to the English aristocracy worked harder and the women could own land. Personal possessions were limited to only what could be carried due to a nomadic lifestyle. Throughout the hundreds of years that the native people had been around they had become accustomed to their lifestyle; however that was all about to change. Making the journey across the ocean was not just the Europeans but their own unique culture that was shockingly different from that of the natives. According to European Christian views man was given by god, the right to rule over everything in the world. This right, to the settlers, also included the Indians because the bible says nothing about them. To the settlers the Indians were obviously subpar and therefore could be dealt with however they pleased. Christian and Amerindian views are so unrelated that they are hardly comparable. To the Indian Christians worshipped their deity by eating him instead of making sacrifices to him. While to the Christians the Aztecs seemed to be devil worshippers who engaged in cannibalism, human sacrifice had skull racks and decorated their temples with snake motifs. Because of their “god given dominance” the settlers believed that they could force upon the Indians the Christian religion. The the action of forcing upon the Indians Christianity caused a substantial social and cultural upheaval. In European culture the men would farm, hunt and gather to provide for the family and when the settlers arrived in the Americas they proceeded to force the Indians to change…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, there are cons to colonization but, the pros outweigh the cons. According to the Friars Semen, we treat the Natives like they are not human beings. We aren’t treating them horribly, we feed them, give them breaks during work and all the rights of a normal human being. We acknowledge their position as a human exerting these rules to show we care. Another complaint we here about our actions, according to the Friars Semen, enslaving the Natives or any human being is morally wrong.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Columbian Exchange began with Christopher Columbus. Trying to reach the East Indies by going west he landed on what is present day Bahamas. Finding Native People there he called them Indians. (Believing he reached India.) Returning to Europe news spread fast about this New World. Exploration to the West soon started after this. The trade between Europeans and Native Americans is known as the Columbian Exchange.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By colonizing sections of Africa, the Europeans were met with many benefits. They reaped the riches of the African lands without lifting a finger. The natives were organized by the whites to do the actual labor of excavating the minerals and other resources found in the colonies. British scholar J. A. Hobson explained, "The foreigners take the wealth out of the country. All the hard work is done by the natives." This was because the whites gained a status above that of the native Africans. Putting the natives to work was a lucrative move for the Europeans. It cost nothing for their labor and the whites made profits from the resources of the colonies.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imperialism Dbq Analysis

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While many of the things brought into place by the European powers harmed the colonists, the benefits outweighed the costs of colonization. This was seen in India during the British rule. “The British brought advanced western education to India. Romesh Dutt believed this brought peace and order to the ancient and civilized India.” (Doc. 7) Imperialism brought modern transportation to colonies. “The rush to colonize nations brought new modes of transportation such as trains, canals, new roads.” (Doc. 3) Imperialism brought a new sense of unity to the colonies. “Many colonists who opposed Imperialism brought together a strong national unity which would not have happened without imperialism.” (Doc. 12) There are many countries today that would still be a majority indigenous and separated today if it weren’t for imperialism.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The 1961 essay of “The Wretched of the earth” by Frank Fanon follows up his 1951 book: “Black Skin White Mask”, which explores colonialism and people’s interaction with it from both the colonized and the colonists side. However, what we were assigned to is the preface of the essay, written by famous philosopher Jean Paul Sartre. Sartre’s mission with this piece is to give a detailed description to how the groups mentioned above, colonized and colonist people, differentiate from each other, how colonizers manipulated the ‘natives’ and how the revolutions came to be. The most intriguing of the themes that, in my opinion, is found in Sartre’s piece is how not only physically but mentally colonizers manipulated and shaped ‘natives’ to put them…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Conklin addresses how European governments viewed colonization and how colonization in Africa became a race for land that resulted in the malpractice of expansion. Conklin's specialization of France during this time period found the correlation between French policy and the rights of free citizens in France. Conklin finds disparity between the two and notes that republican ideas influenced treatment of people in uncivilized colonies. As France began to colonize Africa they wanted to uplift the inferior races and educate them. But their reasoning began to change when other nations started colonizing Africa. This lead to corruption between…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another place in the novel that show colonization is bad is when Davidson take a group of men and kills the Athesheans. Davison was in the new island called New Java since the other island he worked on got destroyed. Major Muhamed is the one in charge on New Java and Muhamed alway follows the rules of the book. Also, Davison does not like Muhamed because he follows the rules that HQ gives them. So, Davison decide to have not follow the rules and gather a couple of men to go attack the Athsheans. In The Word for World…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays