E-learning in a developing country like Bangladesh: Philosophy and reality
Distance Education and Open Learning in a Developing
Country like Bangladesh: Philosophy and Reality.
Sadia Afroze Sultana
Lecturer, Bangladesh open University
Mostafa Azad Kamal
Assistant Professor, Bangladesh Open University
Abstract
Distance education is thought to be an effective way of educating people of all sections in society. The delivery system in distance education is different than that in the conventional on-campus teaching.
However, distance education is considered as close substitute for the conventional on-campus teaching keeping in mind the premises that different types of media (print, audio, video, telephone, computerbased communication system, etc.) are synchronized in the delivery process in distance education and open learning system. Of course, in this age of information super high-way, nobody can challenge the possibility that effective and quality education can be offered through different types of modern media
– without any real class room. Real class room can be substituted by virtual class room environment.
Now a question frequently strikes our mind: “Is the realities in the developing countries like
Bangladesh, where access to modern technologies is very limited, meet the philosophy of distance education?” This paper aims at examining whether there is any gap between the philosophy of the distance education and the reality in the developing countries like Bangladesh and identify the factors lies behind this gap. Then suggests some measures to be taken to minimize the gap. In the paper, we have analysed the data derived from a survey on the Secondary School Certificate programme of Bangladesh
Open University.
Keywords: Philosophy of distance education, Realities, Developing country, media use, access to modern technology.
1. Introduction
For faster growth of the economy of a country human capital should be available along with physical capital. That is why, improving and expanding education are
essential
Country like Bangladesh: Philosophy and Reality.
Sadia Afroze Sultana
Lecturer, Bangladesh open University
Mostafa Azad Kamal
Assistant Professor, Bangladesh Open University
Abstract
Distance education is thought to be an effective way of educating people of all sections in society. The delivery system in distance education is different than that in the conventional on-campus teaching.
However, distance education is considered as close substitute for the conventional on-campus teaching keeping in mind the premises that different types of media (print, audio, video, telephone, computerbased communication system, etc.) are synchronized in the delivery process in distance education and open learning system. Of course, in this age of information super high-way, nobody can challenge the possibility that effective and quality education can be offered through different types of modern media
– without any real class room. Real class room can be substituted by virtual class room environment.
Now a question frequently strikes our mind: “Is the realities in the developing countries like
Bangladesh, where access to modern technologies is very limited, meet the philosophy of distance education?” This paper aims at examining whether there is any gap between the philosophy of the distance education and the reality in the developing countries like Bangladesh and identify the factors lies behind this gap. Then suggests some measures to be taken to minimize the gap. In the paper, we have analysed the data derived from a survey on the Secondary School Certificate programme of Bangladesh
Open University.
Keywords: Philosophy of distance education, Realities, Developing country, media use, access to modern technology.
1. Introduction
For faster growth of the economy of a country human capital should be available along with physical capital. That is why, improving and expanding education are
essential
References: 1. Dekkers,J. (2000): Using technologies for open education – the realities and planning for its use in a developing country, Paper presented at the 3. Lockwood, F.(ed) (1995): Open and distance learning today, London: Routledge. 4. Rumble, G. (1986): The planning and management of distance education, London: Croom Helm. 5. National Education Association (NEA) (1999): What’s the difference: A review of contemporary research on the effectiveness of distance learning in 6. Keegan, D. (1986): The fondation of distance education. London: Croom Helm. 7. Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000): Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education 8. Chute, A., Thompson, M., & Hancock, B. (1999). The McGraw-Hill handbook of distance learning 9. Johnson, R., Martin, A., Mittman, R., & Saffo, P. (1991): Leading business teams: How teams can use technology and group processes to enhance 10. Haraism, L., Hiltz, S., Teles, L., & Turoff, M. (1995): Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online 12. Khan, B. (1997): Web-based instruction. New York: Education Technology Publications. 13. Phelan, K. C., Mendoza-Diaz, N. V. & Mathews, S. A.(2002): An Example of Converting a Traditional Course into Distance Learning: An Open 14. Boettcher, J.V. & Conrad, R.M. (1997): Distance learning : A faculty FAQ. 15. World Development Report, 2000/2001. 16. Moore & Kearsley. (1998). Study Guide for Distance Education: A Systems View