Preview

Democratic Republicans vs. Federalists Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1097 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Democratic Republicans vs. Federalists Essay Example
The first semblance of political parties in the United States formed over the ratification of the Constitution, and two opposing groups were immediately created: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Even though the Democratic-Republicans would hold office in the White-House for more than half of the United States first thirty-six years as a nation, it is the Federalists that had a significantly greater effect on the formation of the United States. Their ratification of the Constitution and support of a centralized, federal government has resulted in the implementation of political systems that have helped the United States become a self-sufficient, united nation throughout its existence. The Anti-Federalists opposed the transition of power to one single government and the lessening power of the states because they believed that this would increase taxes, almost entirely obliterate the states, cause the government to have uncontrollable power over the people, favor the “well born” over the commoners, and end all forms of civil liberty. If the Anti-Federalists had it their preferred way, then they would not have had the Constitution ratified at all because their beliefs disagreed with it directly. Notable patriots such as Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry supported the assertion that the federal government was allotted too much power, which they thought would inevitably led to dictatorial control and tyrannical power abuse. The Democratic-Republicans believed that this national form of government would act monarch-like, which is exactly what they had just fought to escape. Anti-Federalist supporters thought that Congress should not have the right to tax all Americans and they were concerned that the government would eventually become too distant from its own people they were in charge of governing. The Federalists had disagreed with the Democratic-Republicans, entirely. In the Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison, they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Anti-Federalists believed that a strong state government was needed because if you have a strong central government than the people’s rights will not be ensured. (Doc. 4) Patrick Henry opposed the ratification of The Constitution because he believed that without it containing the Bill of Rights it would not allow the people have their natural rights. Anti-Federalist didn’t want to have a stronger national government because it could destroy the liberties of America that have been won during the Revolutionary…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the 1700’s, the first political parties formed over disagreements in the government. The two parties were the federalists and Antifederalists. Federalists made up the people who felt that the stronger government was better for the country and supported the Constitution. The federalists had felt as if different “fiscal and monetary policies” were a weakness for the national economy. Also, the federalists supported banking("Anti-Federalist vs Federalist"). Federalists wanted to fight for stronger governments, managing the country’s debt and ratification. Antifederalists were people who opposed the Constitution of 1788 and disagreed with a stronger federal government. The Antifederalists wanted to keep the power to be for states and local…

    • 183 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    During the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, the two political parties were still somewhat true to their founding ideas, but not completely. The different parties had started to let go of their strong stances and instead begin to take a more, middle of the road viewpoint. The Jeffersonians began to sway from their strict constructionism partly, as they passed things like the 1st Bank of the United States, which went against almost everything the Jeffersonians were for and allowed the government to read-into the constitution. As the Jeffersonians started letting go of their ideals, so did the Federalists.…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the beginning of the country's political growth, the United States was divided into two basic political parties known as the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans. While Jefferson and Madison's presidencies were opposed by the Federalists, some of their contributions supported the Federalist Party's beliefs.. While Jefferson and Madison's decisions in office were mainly based of off a strict construction of the constitution, some decisions came from a loose construction. These loose construction decisions can be seen in the Louisiana Purchase and Jefferson and Madison's support of the national bank.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anti-Federalists restricted approval of the Constitution and favored the adjustment of power being with the states. They trusted that a capable national government would wind up being overbearing and there will be loss of flexibility, higher assessments, and no power for state laws or courts. The fundamental worry for the Anti-Federalists in the Federalist paper #10 was fairness rights for the general population. It is the reason they affirmed of Article 4, since they bolstered the privileges of the general population and having full confidence and credit given to the states influenced them to feel that the privileges of the states would be maintained. The Anti-Federalists battled for the restriction of ratification in the Constitution just…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists have their reasons & the Federalists have theirs. I’m against the idea of a central government and how the freedom of the states should be.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson represented different interests that would come to define the priorities of the nation's 1st political parties (Thomas 10). These two-party political systems were impacted by domestic and foreign affairs. Hamilton and Jefferson had different interests that would define the priorities of the nation's first political parties. The Federalists and Antifederalists division took place during the debates over ratification of the constitution (Sisung 2). The Federalists were more centralized, and they could keep their name as the Federalists because they were much more modest. They were known as those who only looked up to the government and followed all their rules. The Anti-Federalists were decentralized and had a variety of names, Democratic Republicans, Republican, but were mostly called Jeffersonian Republicans. They believed in freedom and opposed the Constitution and federal government which was the total opposite of what the Federalists believe in.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Anti Federalists

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Anti-Federalist had concerns almost immediately after its release. One of the concerns was how much power would be held by Congress. There was a clause in the Constitution that allowed Congress to make laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into ongoing powers. The Anti-Federalists often argued that this would allow the national government to create any law it wished. Importantly they did not want laws that would be harmful and unrepresentative for the people. In addition, the Constitution contained a supremacy clause that recognized the national government as the final arbiter of its disputes for the state which did not seem to be a fair option for the Anti-Federalists. This clause caused the anti-Federalists to believe that states and their citizens would be at the mercy of the national…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    They felt a large national government would be too far removed from the power of the people because it would be governing a large body of constituents, however, by giving more power to the states the Anti-Federalist felt the power would remain with the people.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When the Constitution was first drafted it unknowingly started the creation of the Anti Federalists. The Anti Federalists were a group of people that did not want the Constitution because they believed it would bring a strong central government, which they absolutely did not like. Anti Federalist believed that a strong central government would bring tyranny and violate the citizen’s natural rights.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Their main concerns included the power that the government held and the natural rights that the people could have. The Constitution was thought to be “radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished… The rights of conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press … are rendered insecure” (Henry 1). Not only were they afraid of falling into another monarchy, they also believed that the rights of each man would be terminated after the Constitution is put into effect. Anti-federalists doubted the effect of the Constitution in the future due to their stances on natural rights for the people and the control that the national government had over the…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    antifederalists paper

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    One of the reasons the Anti-Federalist refused to ratify the constitution was because it gave too much power to the government. The constitution would allow the government to tax the people much like British government had done so before in England. Another aspect that they did not like was that the Anti-Federalist felt like the government term positions were too long. They feared that those in power would not want to lose such a power and would end up taking over the position they were in. The Anti-Federalist also felt like they gave too much power to the executive branch by giving him the power to veto laws and to have control of the army. They felt like the executive branch could use the position of Commander in chief to oppress the people. The Anti- Federalist felt as if the constitution was being modeled as though the British were once again in control of them like from before.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1817 the great American experiment was in full swing. America was developing into an effective democratic nation. However as the democracy continued to grow, two opposing political parties developed, the Jeffersonian Republicans and the Federalists. The Jeffersonian Republicans believed in strong state governments, a weak central government, and a strict interpretation of the Constitution. The Federalists saw it differently. They opted for a powerful central government with weaker state governments, and a loose interpretation of the Constitution. The seemingly solid divide between Federalist and Republican would begin to blur during the presidencies of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. For, neither Republican president was able lead the nation with purely republican ideals.…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Have you ever wondered what the different political were like when our country was founded? The two parties were not nearly the same as our Republican and Democratic parties today. The two parties back then were the Federalists and the Republicans.…

    • 107 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The antifederalists rallied behind the ideologies of the Revolution. They saw the federalists as monarchical, detouring from the wants and needs of the people in search for national glory. Patrick Henry and Edmund Randolph both feared that states would lose their right to govern their own people and thus, each state should be able to govern as its own independent entity. They stressed the importance of virtues representation, fearing the proposed congress would be too much like parliament, and the president too much like a king. However, the antifederalists could not agree on an alternative form of government that would fit their agrarian “good society.” They pressed for a Bill of Rights, to ensure individuals would keep their rights and the “ordinary people” would not be forgotten by the monarchs in charge. They wanted to ensure that Revolutionary themes of sovereignty and direct representation would not be lost with the new constitution, placing more importance on their proposed Bill of…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays