Preview

Cessare Beccaria's Effect on Today's Justice System Essay Example

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
463 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Cessare Beccaria's Effect on Today's Justice System Essay Example
Cesare Beccaria’s effect on today’s justice system

Cesare Beccaria was an extremely opinionated man, yet extremely enlightened, especially for his time. This was evident in his most famous, and most influential, written work, “On Crimes and Punishments.” He believed that the criminal justice system during his era was barbaric and irrational, mainly due to the fact that the ideas were based solely on those of the monarch. Beccaria, instead, declared that the laws should be created through a representative of the common people, much like today’s government. Being the civil man he was, his thoughts on punishment were also quite different from the punishment utilized in his society. During this time, punishments were all equally brutal, no matter how minor or major the crime may have been. His opinions on this matter were monumental for his era. His belief was that the severity of each punishment should be based on the severity of the crime, clearly stated on page forty-three of his book with the line "for a punishment to attain its end, the evil which it inflicts has only to exceed the advantage derivable from the crime; in this excess of evil one should include the certainty of punishment and the loss of the good which the crime might have produced. All beyond this is superfluous and for that reason tyrannical." He also expressed the concept that laws should be exceedingly clear and easily comprehensible to all citizens. If laws were made explicit to the public, he believed, crime levels would decrease drastically. Another point Beccaria continually brought up was the idea of a suspect being “innocent until proven guilty,” which is used in every modern day trial under our justice system. His policies about his utopian justice system also included his belief that each criminal should be able to make a closing remark at the end of a trial, even though punishment would be inevitable, and that each suspect of a crime must be kept in prison before trial to ensure

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Twenty-nine years ago on February 23, 23 year old Jaye Potter Mintz was found brutally murdered in her not stark but blood-splattered bedroom by her mother, Lorene Potter. Jaye Potters throat had been slit, her hands tied behind her back, a pillow had covered her face, and she had been raped by her murderer. Potter's son was found crying in a corner holding on for dear life apprehensively as he saw his mother murdered right before his eyes. Earlier that week Potter had put an ad in a newspaper about a waterbed that she was selling, it was believed at the time that the murderer was a possible buyer for the bed and also knew Potter personally.…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    13. He published On Crimes and Punishments, in which he applied critical analysis to the problem of making punishments both effective and just. Who is this? Marquis Cesare…

    • 1417 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elena Eduwiges Sotomayor is one of those people who change the lives of everyone they meet without ever consciously trying to do so. At only the age of ten, she is already becoming a beautiful young lady both inside and out. Her naturally light brown skin tans beautifully in the summer, always without burning. It becomes more of a light caramel color with every passing year and lightens to a beautiful extra-creamy coffee color when the weather cools down. Dirty blonde hair pieced together from every color imaginable frames the chocolate brown eyes that she hides behind the blue-violet pair of glasses perched atop her wide, pointed nose. Elena combines all of this with her strong personality and selfless desire to help anyone around her in…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beccaria’s arguments (Bessler, 2009). Bradford questioned the necessity of capital punishment and argued for the elimination of it for all offenses except high treason and murder until more…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    For hundreds of years, people have been trying to understand criminals and what causes people to act criminally. Many theories were created and some became more widely accepted than others. In the 1700s, a new perspective into criminality rose; the classical perspective. Father of the classical perspective, Cesare Beccaria, provided theories much different from the previous ideas about why people commit crimes. He and others who believed in the classical perspective focused on the idea of free will, and how people weigh the cost and benefits before committing a crime. Beccaria was also a big promoter of deterrence and how it plays a key role in helping reduce crime in societies. After the age of the classical perspective, the father of a new perspective came about, Cesare Lombroso and the positivist perspective. Backed up by theories posed by Charles Darwin, the positivist perspective quickly became widely popular. This perspective rejected the classical ideas and in turn said people do not have free will and do not rationally decide to commit a crime. Their criminal actions were based off of many outside biological, sociological, and psychological factors. Given these widely different beliefs, it is easy to set apart these two perspectives. The opposing views of free will and rational choice, the ways in which positivists think they can identify criminals, and the method for stopping crime are all major aspects that differ a lot between these viewpoints.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the late eighteenth century Britain went through an Enlightenment period, which is also referred to as 'The Age of Reason' (Paine, 1794) and this is because reason was emphasised over religion, secularisation transformed society, new ways of thinking were introduced which influenced the 'Classicalism' theory. This approach was first developed by the Italian scholar Cesare Beccaria, who argued that it is very natural for humans to engage in deviant and criminal thoughts, and it is then an individuals choice whether they want to pursue these deviant thoughts, as “man [is] a rational calculating animal” (Bentham, 1749) when it comes to crime. For instance if the potential gains and pleasure from illegal acts outweigh the potential pains of punishment the crime will be committed. It is through rational thoughts and free-will whether an individual chooses to fulfil illegal activities. Beccaria had a simple conclusion, which was to make the crime harder to commit, and this had several elements to it. Firstly, crime can be controlled by the fear of punishment, thus crime that is perceived to be severe and certain will deter criminal behaviour (Siegal, 2010) therefore crimes should be harder to commit and the punishment should fit the crime.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital Punishment is a moral controversy in today’s society. It is the judicial execution of criminals judged guilty of capital offenses by the state, or in other words, the death penalty. The first established death penalty laws can date back to the Eighteenth Century B.C. and the ethical debates towards this issue have existed just as long. There is a constant pro-con debate about this issue, and philosophers like Aristotle and Mill have their own take on this controversy as well. Aristotle is against capital punishment, while Mill believes it is morally permissible.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Legal Studies Crime Essay

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Statutory and judicial guidelines inform the exercise of judicable discretion in the area of sentencing. These guidelines aim to provide greater uniformity in sentencing matters and enhance the integrity of the process. Judicial guidelines are judgements from superior courts that aim to structure discretion, this is shown in the case R v Jurisic (1998), this case was used by the Criminal Court of Appeals to set guidelines that any non-custodial sentence for culpable driving should be exceptional. Judges are bound to any relevant legislation which impacts upon the sentencing process such as: The Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) this prescribes the maximum sentence that may be imposed for various offences. The Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) this prescribes general guidelines in relation to sentencing. For example it identifies what might constitute a mitigating or aggravating circumstance. However, it is left to the exercise of judicial discretion as to how much weight should be given to such circumstances. Mandatory sentencing takes away the exercise of judicial discretion. The court has no choice but to impose the legislated sentence. Amendments to the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), have prescribed minimum non-parole periods for specific offences, such as ten years for aggravated sexual assault. The provision of statutory and judicial guidelines means that limits are placed on a judge’s discretion when sentencing, and this ensures sentencing consistency. However, some people feel that judges still have too much discretion when sentencing, and that some sentences are too lenient. Link…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beccaria's Theory

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    While cesare beccaria believed in the need for a criminal justice system and the right of the government to have laws and punishments, he never viewed the current justice system to be a successful one. Beccaria felt that the government and its laws at the time were just a “few remnants of the laws of an ancient predatory people, compiled for a monarch who ruled 12 centuries ago in Constantinople, mixed subsequently with longobardic tribal customs, and bound together in chaotic volumes of obscure and unauthorized interpreters.” He had also felt that the criminal laws should be based on rational thought and not passion. Cesare argued that the threat of punishment controls crime. 1. Do other forms of social control exist? Yes! Other forms of social control exist and not only that without valid and reliable measures of criminal behavior, efforts to conduct research on crime and formulate criminological theories would be futile although some behaviors are handled differently than others. 2. Aside from the threat of legal punishment, what else controls your behavior? A person’s behavior is basically regulated by a sense of what is right and wrong. Society sets behavior expectations that become a part of what is acceptable or not in how we live our lives. Acceptable behavior is reinforced at home during the developmental years of a child. Families play a major role in how individuals consider what behavior is acceptable. For example women, it is not so much society that governs their behavior. For a woman the primary behavior modifier is their inferior brains, which limit their behaviors to cooking, cleaning, producing and raising children, and general. Social norms discourage men from being stay at home dads, expressing emotions, being nurses, cooking, cleaning, etc. Males in society are governed by social expectations. Besides that a liberal justification of punishment would proceed by…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cost of the Death Penalty

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Costanzo concludes there are four trends throughout the history of the death penalty. First, he believes there has been a dramatic shrinking in the number and types of crimes punishable by death. At one point in early colonial times, he argues that there were over fifty crimes fit for death, including vagrancy and petty theft. He believes there is a trend that attempts to lessen the cruelty of executions. Through the tests and reviews of past methods of killing, each one gets a little more "humane", as the Supreme Court puts it. The third trend mentioned attempts to make the death penalty imposed fairly and rationally. Through the revised process of how it is imposed, to the choice of death in the jury's deliberations, there have been drastic changes in how we chose the use this method of punishment. Lastly, the fourth trend is the sanitizing of executions (conducted late at night and using well-defined and specialized procedures). Although this may run side by side with the revision of the death penalty process, Costanzo explains that there is a difference between the reasons why we chose the death penalty in cases, which is the revision discussed in…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    References: Hartley, R. D., & Rabe, G. A. (2008). Criminal Courts: Structures, Process, and Issues (2nd ed.).…

    • 1585 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Probation and Parole

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages

    1. What did Cesare Beccaria, the Enlightenment thinker, mean when he said that a punishment should fit the crime?…

    • 1867 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Enlightenment elaborated on the controversy of whether or not certain punishments were barbarous. One man, named Caesare Beccaria yearned to abolish malevolent punishments. “Is the death penalty really useful and necessary for the security and good order of society? Are torture and torments just, and do they attain the end for which laws are instituted” (Beccaria). Beccaria essentially sought for just indictments of respective crimes, as opposed to death and torture. In modern society in the US, the eighth amendment protects the citizens from undergoing cruel and unusual punishments as a way to indict someone for committing a crime. However, in certain places, cruel and unusual punishments still exist. Many terrorist groups will perform beheadings or lynch people, as a way of punishment. In the Philippines, “... a Malaysian kidnap victim was beheaded by Abu Sayyaf militants in the southern Philippines on Tuesday after a large ransom demand was not paid, two military officials said.” ( ). Due to the failure of the Philippine government to make payment to the militants, they responded by punishing a man, which they kidnapped, by means of execution. The Enlightenment was able to essentially revoke the cruel and harsh punishments imparted upon people, however, only to a certain extent, as in certain parts of the world, hellish punishments still…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The American justice system is one of the greatest aspects of the U.S. Constitution. The judicial branch insures that anyone in America receives a fair trial, that a nobody is incarcerated without due process and significant evidence, it assumes innocents until proven guilt, and protects the rights of citizens, victims, and the accused. The American justice system works most of the time, in that criminals normally go to jail while innocent people are set free; however, every system has its faults. Foremost, there is much debate over the concept of “guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Many argue that courts do not always prove guilt or innocence, as in many people who are guilty of their crimes are not convicted because there was not enough evidence. The concept of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ is subjective and left up to the standards of the jurors. In today’s society, if a case does not have physical evidence, but strong circumstantial evidence and eyewitness accounts (evidence that was often deemed enough to convict several decades ago), the jury still may not convict because they have the idea that their should be some type of physical evidence for the person to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Often times, the idea of true guilt is lost in trying to prove ‘beyond a reasonable doubt.’…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham City Jail”, King talks about how to know the difference between just and unjust laws. He states, “Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust”(Shafer-Landau 408). King believed that unjust laws promote disharmony and that these laws essentially destroy human personality, while just laws uplift personality. In his opinion, he believed that laws were characterized as just laws if they were helping to make an individual better as a person, if it did not meet those standards it was considered to be an unjust law. An unjust law is a “code that is out of harmony with the moral law”(Shafer-Landau 408) essentially meaning that an unjust law is a law that is…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays